Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-15

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描威胁情报

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-15

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 316 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 27 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 289 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 22 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(27)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 13 个
  • 🟠 高危: 9 个
  • 🟡 中危: 5 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

Dify <=1.14.1 - Unauthenticated Plugin Daemon Path Traversal

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-41948
  • CVE: CVE-2026-41948 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.0739 (percentile 0.94074) @ 2026-09-14

描述: Dify version 1.14.1 and prior are affected by an unauthenticated path traversal in the Plugin Daemon icon proxy endpoint. The /console/api/workspaces/current/plugin/icon endpoint requires no authentication and passes the filename query parameter unsanitized into the internal Plugin Daemon REST API URL. Using ../ dot-sequence traversal an attacker escapes the authorized plugin/{tenant_id}/asset/ namespace and reaches arbitrary internal Plugin Daemon endpoints. The /health/check endpoint is always available and returns Plugin Daemon version, build time and pool status confirming exploitation.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-41948

参考链接:

Dify <=1.14.1 - Unauthenticated Plugin Daemon Path Traversal

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-41948
  • CVE: CVE-2026-41948 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.0739 (percentile 0.94074) @ 2026-09-14

描述: Dify version 1.14.1 and prior are affected by an unauthenticated path traversal in the Plugin Daemon icon proxy endpoint. The /console/api/workspaces/current/plugin/icon endpoint requires no authentication and passes the filename query parameter unsanitized into the internal Plugin Daemon REST API URL. Using ../ dot-sequence traversal an attacker escapes the authorized plugin/{tenant_id}/asset/ namespace and reaches arbitrary internal Plugin Daemon endpoints. The /health/check endpoint is always available and returns Plugin Daemon version, build time and pool status confirming exploitation.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-41948

参考链接:

CtrlPanel <= 1.1.1 - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-34234
  • CVE: CVE-2026-34234 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00821 (percentile 0.55259) @ 2026-09-14

描述: CtrlPanel versions <= 1.1.1 are vulnerable to unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) via the web installer endpoint (public/installer/index.php). The installer loaded and executed form handler files before checking for the install.lock gate, allowing attackers to reach installer forms on fully-deployed instances. User-supplied POST values (url, key, clientkey) from the Pterodactyl configuration form were interpolated directly into shell command strings executed via bash -c without sanitization, enabling command injection. The vulnerability is confirmed actively exploited in the wild.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-34234

参考链接:

LightRAG <= 1.5.3 - Credentialed CORS Wildcard

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-61736
  • CVE: CVE-2026-61736 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00532 (percentile 0.4335) @ 2026-09-14

描述: LightRAG <= 1.5.4 contains a broken access control vulnerability caused by default CORS_ORIGINS=* with allow_credentials=True in lightrag_server.py, letting malicious websites perform authenticated API requests, exploit requires authenticated user.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-61736

参考链接:

CtrlPanel <= 1.1.1 - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-34234
  • CVE: CVE-2026-34234 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00821 (percentile 0.55259) @ 2026-09-14

描述: CtrlPanel versions <= 1.1.1 are vulnerable to unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) via the web installer endpoint (public/installer/index.php). The installer loaded and executed form handler files before checking for the install.lock gate, allowing attackers to reach installer forms on fully-deployed instances. User-supplied POST values (url, key, clientkey) from the Pterodactyl configuration form were interpolated directly into shell command strings executed via bash -c without sanitization, enabling command injection. The vulnerability is confirmed actively exploited in the wild.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-34234

参考链接:

Dify <=1.14.1 - Unauthenticated Plugin Daemon Path Traversal

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-41948
  • CVE: CVE-2026-41948 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.0739 (percentile 0.94074) @ 2026-09-14

描述: Dify version 1.14.1 and prior are affected by an unauthenticated path traversal in the Plugin Daemon icon proxy endpoint. The /console/api/workspaces/current/plugin/icon endpoint requires no authentication and passes the filename query parameter unsanitized into the internal Plugin Daemon REST API URL. Using ../ dot-sequence traversal an attacker escapes the authorized plugin/{tenant_id}/asset/ namespace and reaches arbitrary internal Plugin Daemon endpoints. The /health/check endpoint is always available and returns Plugin Daemon version, build time and pool status confirming exploitation.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-41948

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.84639) @ 2026-09-14

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.20586 (percentile 0.97373) @ 2026-09-14

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32463
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32463 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.59417 (percentile 0.99067) @ 2026-09-14

描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.31138 (percentile 0.98166) @ 2026-09-14

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-9242
  • CVE: CVE-2025-9242 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.913 (percentile 0.99804) @ 2026-09-14

描述: WatchGuard Fireware OS 11.10.2 to 11.12.4_Update1, 12.0 to 12.11.3, and 2025.1 contains an out-of-bounds write caused by improper handling in Mobile User VPN and Branch Office VPN with IKEv2 dynamic gateway peer, letting remote unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-9242

参考链接:

Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-8467
  • CVE: CVE-2026-8467 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02111 (percentile 0.80766) @ 2026-09-14

描述: Phenixdigital phoenix_storybook >=0.5.0 <1.1.0 contains a code injection caused by unsanitized attribute value interpolation in HEEx template generation, letting unauthenticated remote attackers execute arbitrary code on the server, exploit requires sending crafted WebSocket event data.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-8467

参考链接:

Dify <=1.14.1 - Unauthenticated Plugin Daemon Path Traversal

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-41948
  • CVE: CVE-2026-41948 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.0739 (percentile 0.94074) @ 2026-09-14

描述: Dify version 1.14.1 and prior are affected by an unauthenticated path traversal in the Plugin Daemon icon proxy endpoint. The /console/api/workspaces/current/plugin/icon endpoint requires no authentication and passes the filename query parameter unsanitized into the internal Plugin Daemon REST API URL. Using ../ dot-sequence traversal an attacker escapes the authorized plugin/{tenant_id}/asset/ namespace and reaches arbitrary internal Plugin Daemon endpoints. The /health/check endpoint is always available and returns Plugin Daemon version, build time and pool status confirming exploitation.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-41948

参考链接:

CtrlPanel <= 1.1.1 - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-34234
  • CVE: CVE-2026-34234 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00821 (percentile 0.55259) @ 2026-09-14

描述: CtrlPanel versions <= 1.1.1 are vulnerable to unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) via the web installer endpoint (public/installer/index.php). The installer loaded and executed form handler files before checking for the install.lock gate, allowing attackers to reach installer forms on fully-deployed instances. User-supplied POST values (url, key, clientkey) from the Pterodactyl configuration form were interpolated directly into shell command strings executed via bash -c without sanitization, enabling command injection. The vulnerability is confirmed actively exploited in the wild.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-34234

参考链接:

LightRAG <= 1.5.3 - Credentialed CORS Wildcard

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-61736
  • CVE: CVE-2026-61736 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00532 (percentile 0.4335) @ 2026-09-14

描述: LightRAG <= 1.5.4 contains a broken access control vulnerability caused by default CORS_ORIGINS=* with allow_credentials=True in lightrag_server.py, letting malicious websites perform authenticated API requests, exploit requires authenticated user.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-61736

参考链接:

Discourse - Private User Field Disclosure via Directory Items IDOR

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-26265
  • CVE: CVE-2026-26265 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00266 (percentile 0.18764) @ 2026-09-14

描述: Discourse prior to 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 contains an IDOR vulnerability caused by lack of authorization checks on user_field_ids parameter in DirectoryItemsController#index, letting any user retrieve private user field values, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-26265

参考链接:

Docmost 0.2.1-0.21.0 - Arbitrary File Read

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-57231
  • CVE: CVE-2025-57231 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00387 (percentile 0.32253) @ 2026-09-14

描述: Docmost v0.21.0 contains a path traversal caused by improper handling of avatar attachments, letting unauthenticated attackers disclose local files via a POST request on a public URL.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-57231

参考链接:

Feast Feature Server <=0.58.0 - Arbitrary File Read

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-23536
  • CVE: CVE-2026-23536 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01912 (percentile 0.78657) @ 2026-09-14

描述: Feast (the open-source Feature Store) Feature Server through 0.58.0 exposes an unauthenticated POST /read-document endpoint that reads an arbitrary, caller-supplied file path with no authentication and no path validation. The read_document_endpoint handler passes the JSON file_path field straight to os.path.exists()/open() and returns the file contents in the JSON content field, so a remote, unauthenticated attacker can read any file readable by the server process (e.g. /etc/passwd, feature_store.yaml, cloud credentials). Unlike the store-mutating routes it carries no inject_user_details/permission dependency.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-23536

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01647 (percentile 0.7514) @ 2026-09-14

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88734) @ 2026-09-14

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

Discourse - Private User Field Disclosure via Directory Items IDOR

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-26265
  • CVE: CVE-2026-26265 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00266 (percentile 0.18764) @ 2026-09-14

描述: Discourse prior to 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 contains an IDOR vulnerability caused by lack of authorization checks on user_field_ids parameter in DirectoryItemsController#index, letting any user retrieve private user field values, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-26265

参考链接:

Docmost 0.2.1-0.21.0 - Arbitrary File Read

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-57231
  • CVE: CVE-2025-57231 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00387 (percentile 0.32253) @ 2026-09-14

描述: Docmost v0.21.0 contains a path traversal caused by improper handling of avatar attachments, letting unauthenticated attackers disclose local files via a POST request on a public URL.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-57231

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产EPSS风险评分
Dify <=1.14.1 - Unauthenticated Plugin Dae🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.07395/5
Dify <=1.14.1 - Unauthenticated Plugin Dae🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.07395/5
CtrlPanel <= 1.1.1 - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00825/5
LightRAG <= 1.5.3 - Credentialed CORS Wild🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00535/5
CtrlPanel <= 1.1.1 - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00825/5
Dify <=1.14.1 - Unauthenticated Plugin Dae🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.07395/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02635/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.20595/5
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.59425/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.31145/5
WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.91305/5
Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02115/5
Dify <=1.14.1 - Unauthenticated Plugin Dae🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.07395/5
CtrlPanel <= 1.1.1 - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00825/5
LightRAG <= 1.5.3 - Credentialed CORS Wild🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00535/5
Discourse - Private User Field Disclosure via Dire🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00274.5/5
Docmost 0.2.1-0.21.0 - Arbitrary File Read🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00394.5/5
Feast Feature Server <=0.58.0 - Arbitrary🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01914.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01654.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.03584.5/5
Discourse - Private User Field Disclosure via Dire🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00274.5/5
Docmost 0.2.1-0.21.0 - Arbitrary File Read🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00394.5/5
Appium base-driver <=10.6.0 - Reflected Cr🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.00253.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01213.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01723.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01703.5/5
Appium base-driver <=10.6.0 - Reflected Cr🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.00253.5/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-41948.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-41948.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-34234.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-61736.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-34234.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-41948.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-41948.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-34234.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-61736.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-26265.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-57231.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-23536.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-26265.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-57231.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-41948.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-41948.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-34234.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-61736.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-34234.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-41948.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-41948.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-34234.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-61736.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-26265.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-57231.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-23536.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-26265.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-57231.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-58191.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-58191.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-14
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-14

4 个共同标签

从 902 个模板更新中精选分析 21 个高价值 POC，发现 12 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-13

4 个共同标签

从 301 个模板更新中精选分析 12 个高价值 POC，发现 9 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-12

4 个共同标签

从 605 个模板更新中精选分析 25 个高价值 POC，发现 19 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-11

4 个共同标签

从 321 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 20 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-10

4 个共同标签

从 617 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 21 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章