Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-29

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描威胁情报

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-29

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 627 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 597 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 27 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 22 个
  • 🟠 高危: 5 个
  • 🟡 中危: 3 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

LearnPress <= 4.4.9.1 - PHP Object Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-104736
  • CVE: CVE-2026-104736 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00676 (percentile 0.52105) @ 2026-10-28

描述: LearnPress WordPress plugin <= 4.4.10 contains a PHP Object Injection caused by deserialization of untrusted 'checkout-email' parameter in checkout AJAX action, letting unauthenticated attackers inject PHP objects remotely.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-104736

参考链接:

Apache Tika - XXE Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-54988
  • CVE: CVE-2025-54988 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: Apache 服务器
  • 预估影响: 数百万台
  • EPSS: 0.47948 (percentile 0.9885) @ 2026-10-28

描述: Apache Tika versions 1.13 through 3.2.1 are vulnerable to XXE via malicious XFA in PDFs, allowing file read and SSRF attacks.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Collabora Built-in CODE Server < 26.4.303 - OS Command Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-110447
  • CVE: CVE-2026-110447 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.11634 (percentile 0.96034) @ 2026-10-28

描述: Collabora Online Built-in CODE Server before 26.4.303 contains a command injection caused by improper handling in proxy.php when the CODE server is not running, letting remote attackers execute OS commands, exploit requires CODE server to be stopped.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-110447

参考链接:

LibreNMS <= 26.7.0 - Unauthenticated API Access

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-86426
  • CVE: CVE-2026-86426 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.04358 (percentile 0.91205) @ 2026-10-28

描述: LibreNMS <= 26.8.0 contains an authentication bypass caused by MySQL type coercion in the REST API token validation, letting unauthenticated attackers access protected endpoints and execute remote code via alert templates.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Zammad 6.3.0-6.5.4 - Session Hijacking & Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-102489
  • CVE: CVE-2026-102489 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01955 (percentile 0.80193) @ 2026-10-28

描述: Zammad 6.3.0 to 6.5.4 contains a session hijack vulnerability caused by improper session management, letting remote attackers execute code as the zammad user, exploit requires vulnerable version and session hijack.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-102489

参考链接:

Apache Tika - XXE Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-54988
  • CVE: CVE-2025-54988 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: Apache 服务器
  • 预估影响: 数百万台
  • EPSS: 0.47948 (percentile 0.9885) @ 2026-10-28

描述: Apache Tika versions 1.13 through 3.2.1 are vulnerable to XXE via malicious XFA in PDFs, allowing file read and SSRF attacks.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Collabora Built-in CODE Server < 26.4.303 - OS Command Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-110447
  • CVE: CVE-2026-110447 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.11634 (percentile 0.96034) @ 2026-10-28

描述: Collabora Online Built-in CODE Server before 26.4.303 contains a command injection caused by improper handling in proxy.php when the CODE server is not running, letting remote attackers execute OS commands, exploit requires CODE server to be stopped.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-110447

参考链接:

LibreNMS <= 26.7.0 - Unauthenticated API Access

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-86426
  • CVE: CVE-2026-86426 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.04358 (percentile 0.91205) @ 2026-10-28

描述: LibreNMS <= 26.8.0 contains an authentication bypass caused by MySQL type coercion in the REST API token validation, letting unauthenticated attackers access protected endpoints and execute remote code via alert templates.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Zammad 6.3.0-6.5.4 - Session Hijacking & Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-102489
  • CVE: CVE-2026-102489 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01955 (percentile 0.80193) @ 2026-10-28

描述: Zammad 6.3.0 to 6.5.4 contains a session hijack vulnerability caused by improper session management, letting remote attackers execute code as the zammad user, exploit requires vulnerable version and session hijack.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-102489

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.85435) @ 2026-10-28

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Ivanti Connect Secure - Stack-based Buffer Overflow

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-22457
  • CVE: CVE-2025-22457 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.99981 (percentile 0.99981) @ 2026-10-28

描述: Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.6, Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.4, and Ivanti ZTA Gateways before version 22.8R2.2 contain a stack-based buffer overflow caused by improper input handling, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code without authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-22457

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.20965 (percentile 0.97553) @ 2026-10-28

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32463
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32463 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.55498 (percentile 0.99032) @ 2026-10-28

描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463

参考链接:

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6216 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.47775 (percentile 0.98846) @ 2026-10-28

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.3185 (percentile 0.98295) @ 2026-10-28

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-8467
  • CVE: CVE-2026-8467 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02111 (percentile 0.81728) @ 2026-10-28

描述: Phenixdigital phoenix_storybook >=0.5.0 <1.1.0 contains a code injection caused by unsanitized attribute value interpolation in HEEx template generation, letting unauthenticated remote attackers execute arbitrary code on the server, exploit requires sending crafted WebSocket event data.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-8467

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.85435) @ 2026-10-28

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Ivanti Connect Secure - Stack-based Buffer Overflow

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-22457
  • CVE: CVE-2025-22457 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.99981 (percentile 0.99981) @ 2026-10-28

描述: Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.6, Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.4, and Ivanti ZTA Gateways before version 22.8R2.2 contain a stack-based buffer overflow caused by improper input handling, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code without authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-22457

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.20965 (percentile 0.97553) @ 2026-10-28

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32463
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32463 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.55498 (percentile 0.99032) @ 2026-10-28

描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463

参考链接:

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6216 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.47775 (percentile 0.98846) @ 2026-10-28

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.3185 (percentile 0.98295) @ 2026-10-28

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

XWiki Platform - Password Hash Disclosure

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-48048
  • CVE: CVE-2026-48048 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00651 (percentile 0.51076) @ 2026-10-28

描述: XWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform. The patch for GHSA-5cf8-vrr8-8hjm / CVE-2023-26476 was insufficient. Starting with version 6.2.1 and prior to 16.10.17, 17.4.9, 17.10.13, and 18.0.0RC1, slightly modified LiveTableResults parameters (for example password_class) still allow an unauthenticated attacker to discover password hashes one bit at a time. With about 768 requests, the full password salt and hash of a user can be retrieved. The check for password and email properties does not consider the class passed via the _class parameters.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-48048

参考链接:

GeoNetwork - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-55864
  • CVE: CVE-2026-55864 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00587 (percentile 0.47922) @ 2026-10-28

描述: GeoNetwork versions 4.0.0 to 4.2.16 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.11 are vulnerable to an unauthenticated server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the SLD tool. The POST /srv/api/tools/ogc/sld endpoint accepts a caller-supplied WMS server URL and performs a server-side HTTP GetStyles request to it without any validation, allowing an anonymous attacker to make the server issue arbitrary outbound HTTP requests to internal services and read XML responses back.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-55864

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01647 (percentile 0.76381) @ 2026-10-28

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.04308 (percentile 0.91119) @ 2026-10-28

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01647 (percentile 0.76381) @ 2026-10-28

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产EPSS风险评分
LearnPress <= 4.4.9.1 - PHP Object Injecti🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00685/5
Apache Tika - XXE Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞Apache 服务器0.47955/5
Collabora Built-in CODE Server < 26.4.303 - OS🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.11635/5
LibreNMS <= 26.7.0 - Unauthenticated API A🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.04365/5
Zammad 6.3.0-6.5.4 - Session Hijacking & Remote Co🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.01965/5
Apache Tika - XXE Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞Apache 服务器0.47955/5
Collabora Built-in CODE Server < 26.4.303 - OS🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.11635/5
LibreNMS <= 26.7.0 - Unauthenticated API A🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.04365/5
Zammad 6.3.0-6.5.4 - Session Hijacking & Remote Co🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.01965/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02635/5
Ivanti Connect Secure - Stack-based Buffer Overflo🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.99985/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.20975/5
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.55505/5
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.47785/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.31855/5
Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02115/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02635/5
Ivanti Connect Secure - Stack-based Buffer Overflo🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.99985/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.20975/5
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.55505/5
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.47785/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.31855/5
XWiki Platform - Password Hash Disclosure🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00654.5/5
GeoNetwork - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00594.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01654.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.04314.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01654.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01233.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01723.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01823.5/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-104736.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54988.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-110447.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-86426.yaml -t websocket/cves/2026/CVE-2026-102489.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54988.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-110447.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-86426.yaml -t websocket/cves/2026/CVE-2026-102489.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22457.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22457.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-48048.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-55864.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-104736.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54988.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-110447.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-86426.yaml -t websocket/cves/2026/CVE-2026-102489.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54988.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-110447.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-86426.yaml -t websocket/cves/2026/CVE-2026-102489.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22457.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22457.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-48048.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-55864.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-28
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-28

4 个共同标签

从 624 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 24 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-27

4 个共同标签

从 633 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 27 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-26

4 个共同标签

从 607 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 27 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-25

4 个共同标签

从 612 个模板更新中精选分析 23 个高价值 POC，发现 17 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-24

4 个共同标签

从 933 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 27 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章