Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-30

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描威胁情报

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-30

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 624 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 594 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 20 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(29), 其他(1)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 15 个
  • 🟠 高危: 5 个
  • 🟡 中危: 10 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

YMC Filter - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-54836
  • CVE: CVE-2026-54836 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.01343 (percentile 0.7129) @ 2026-10-29

描述: YMC Filter <= 3.11.5 contains an sql injection caused by improper neutralization of special elements in SQL commands, letting attackers execute arbitrary SQL queries, exploit requires crafted input.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-54836

参考链接:

TEN Framework - Arbitrary File Read & Write

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-85688
  • CVE: CVE-2026-85688 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02641 (percentile 0.85544) @ 2026-10-29

描述: TEN Framework 0.11.71 contains unauthenticated arbitrary file read and write vulnerabilities in the TMAN Designer file-content API endpoints, letting attackers read or write arbitrary files and execute code. The exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-85688

参考链接:

YMC Filter - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-54836
  • CVE: CVE-2026-54836 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.01343 (percentile 0.7129) @ 2026-10-29

描述: YMC Filter <= 3.11.5 contains an sql injection caused by improper neutralization of special elements in SQL commands, letting attackers execute arbitrary SQL queries, exploit requires crafted input.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-54836

参考链接:

TEN Framework - Arbitrary File Read & Write

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-85688
  • CVE: CVE-2026-85688 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02641 (percentile 0.85544) @ 2026-10-29

描述: TEN Framework 0.11.71 contains unauthenticated arbitrary file read and write vulnerabilities in the TMAN Designer file-content API endpoints, letting attackers read or write arbitrary files and execute code. The exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-85688

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.85451) @ 2026-10-29

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.20965 (percentile 0.97556) @ 2026-10-29

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32463
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32463 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.55498 (percentile 0.99033) @ 2026-10-29

描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.3185 (percentile 0.98297) @ 2026-10-29

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-8467
  • CVE: CVE-2026-8467 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02111 (percentile 0.81751) @ 2026-10-29

描述: Phenixdigital phoenix_storybook >=0.5.0 <1.1.0 contains a code injection caused by unsanitized attribute value interpolation in HEEx template generation, letting unauthenticated remote attackers execute arbitrary code on the server, exploit requires sending crafted WebSocket event data.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-8467

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.85451) @ 2026-10-29

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.20965 (percentile 0.97556) @ 2026-10-29

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32463
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32463 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.55498 (percentile 0.99033) @ 2026-10-29

描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.3185 (percentile 0.98297) @ 2026-10-29

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-8467
  • CVE: CVE-2026-8467 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02111 (percentile 0.81751) @ 2026-10-29

描述: Phenixdigital phoenix_storybook >=0.5.0 <1.1.0 contains a code injection caused by unsanitized attribute value interpolation in HEEx template generation, letting unauthenticated remote attackers execute arbitrary code on the server, exploit requires sending crafted WebSocket event data.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-8467

参考链接:

NUUO Crystal Server - Unauthenticated File Upload Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: nuuo-unauth-rce
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: NUUO Crystal Server 3.19.0.85 exposes an unauthenticated file upload handler at upload.php that echoes the client-supplied multipart filename and passes it directly to copy() as the destination, with no authentication, extension, MIME or path validation. An anonymous POST writes an attacker-named PHP file into the served document root, and a single GET triggers the lighttpd fastcgi mapping to execute it, yielding remote code execution as the product's PHP service account.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

XWiki Platform - Path Traversal

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-34151
  • CVE: CVE-2026-34151 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01062 (percentile 0.6452) @ 2026-10-29

描述: XWiki Platform is a generic wiki platform. Prior to 17.10.5 and 18.2.0, the /skin/ action in com.xpn.xwiki.web.SkinAction can resolve double-encoded parent-directory segments outside the intended skin or web-application resource prefix when Jetty 12 or later decodes the request path. The affected lookup is replaced with Environment.getResourceAsStream(String, String), which constrains a resource to its expected prefix. An unauthenticated remote attacker can use the vulnerable behavior to read arbitrary resources permitted to the Jetty process, including WEB-INF/xwiki.cfg and, depending on deployment depth and operating-system permissions, host files. Tomcat and Jetty versions before 12 do not appear affected. This issue is fixed in versions 17.10.5 and 18.2.0.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-34151

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01647 (percentile 0.7641) @ 2026-10-29

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.04308 (percentile 0.91131) @ 2026-10-29

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01647 (percentile 0.7641) @ 2026-10-29

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.04308 (percentile 0.91131) @ 2026-10-29

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产EPSS风险评分
YMC Filter - SQL Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.01345/5
TEN Framework - Arbitrary File Read & Write🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02645/5
YMC Filter - SQL Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.01345/5
TEN Framework - Arbitrary File Read & Write🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02645/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02635/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.20975/5
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.55505/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.31855/5
Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02115/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02635/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.20975/5
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.55505/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.31855/5
Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02115/5
NUUO Crystal Server - Unauthenticated File Upload🔴 critical其他通用-5/5
XWiki Platform - Path Traversal🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01064.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01654.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.04314.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01654.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.04314.5/5
Transmission 4.0.0-4.1.2 - Permissive CORS Exposes🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.00533.5/5
WordPress Check & Log Email < 2.0.15 - SQL Inje🟡 mediumCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00403.5/5
MLflow <3.17.0 - Unauthenticated SSRF via Third🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.00683.5/5
MLflow <3.17.0 - Unauthenticated SSRF via Third🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.00683.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01233.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01723.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01823.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01233.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01723.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01823.5/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-54836.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-85688.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-54836.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-85688.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/other/nuuo-unauth-rce.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-34151.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-54836.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-85688.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-54836.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-85688.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/other/nuuo-unauth-rce.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-34151.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-116748.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-14554.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-115886.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-115886.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-29
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-29

4 个共同标签

从 627 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 27 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-28

4 个共同标签

从 624 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 24 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-27

4 个共同标签

从 633 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 27 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-26

4 个共同标签

从 607 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 27 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-25

4 个共同标签

从 612 个模板更新中精选分析 23 个高价值 POC，发现 17 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章