Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-16

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描威胁情报

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-16

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 924 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 894 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 27 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(29), 其他(1)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 22 个
  • 🟠 高危: 5 个
  • 🟡 中危: 3 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

OpenCTI < 6.9.13 - Authentication Bypass via User Impersonation

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-27960
  • CVE: CVE-2026-27960 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00584 (percentile 0.46196) @ 2026-09-15

描述: OpenCTI < 6.9.13 allows authentication bypass by supplying a Bearer token set to the admin user's internal_id UUID instead of a valid JWT. The default admin internal_id (88ec0c6a-13ce-5e39-b486-354fe4a7084f) grants full admin access to the GraphQL API, effectively bypassing all authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-27960

参考链接:

Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-8467
  • CVE: CVE-2026-8467 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02111 (percentile 0.80798) @ 2026-09-15

描述: Phenixdigital phoenix_storybook >=0.5.0 <1.1.0 contains a code injection caused by unsanitized attribute value interpolation in HEEx template generation, letting unauthenticated remote attackers execute arbitrary code on the server, exploit requires sending crafted WebSocket event data.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-8467

参考链接:

Langflow <=1.2.x - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via validate_code

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-0768
  • CVE: CVE-2026-0768 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.0231 (percentile 0.82458) @ 2026-09-15

描述: Langflow <= 1.2.x exposes POST /api/v1/validate/code without any authentication. The endpoint calls validate_code() which exec()s user-supplied Python code. Default-argument expressions in Python execute at function-definition time, allowing arbitrary OS command execution without authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-0768

参考链接:

ruflo MCP Bridge - Unauthenticated RCE via terminal_execute

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-59726
  • CVE: CVE-2026-59726 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.06883 (percentile 0.937) @ 2026-09-15

描述: ruflo MCP bridge (< 3.16.3) in its default docker-compose deployment exposes POST /mcp with no authentication and binds to all interfaces (0.0.0.0:3001). The executeTool() function has no server-side deny list for dangerous tools, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to invoke tools/call with ruflo__terminal_execute, which runs execSync(command) on attacker-supplied input. This yields arbitrary command execution as the node user (uid 1000) inside the bridge container. The blocklist (AUTOPILOT_BLOCKED_PATTERNS + isBlockedTool()) is enforced only in the autopilot SSE handler; POST /mcp and POST /mcp/:group bypass it entirely.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-59726

参考链接:

Divi Form Builder <=5.1.8 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload RCE

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-5524
  • CVE: CVE-2026-5524 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00922 (percentile 0.58448) @ 2026-09-15

描述: The Divi Form Builder plugin for WordPress versions 5.1.8 and prior contains an unauthenticated arbitrary file upload vulnerability in the do_image_upload() AJAX handler. The user-controlled acceptFileTypes POST parameter is injected unsanitized into a PHP regex for file extension validation. By supplying acceptFileTypes=phtml the constructed regex accepts .phtml files while the plugin's .htaccess only blocks .php, so Apache executes .phtml files as PHP. The required nonce (fb_nonce) is publicly embedded in any page containing a Divi form via the de_fb_obj JavaScript object. Uploaded shells land in /wp-content/uploads/de_fb_uploads/. Fixed in 5.1.9.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-5524

参考链接:

Ivanti EPMM <=12.7.0.0 - Unauthenticated Code Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-1281
  • CVE: CVE-2026-1281 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.81788 (percentile 0.99626) @ 2026-09-15

描述: Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile (EPMM) versions 12.5.0.0 through 12.7.0.0 contain a code injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution on the target system.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-1281

参考链接:

ArangoDB - Authentication Bypass via URL-Encoded Underscore (%5f) to RCE

  • 漏洞ID: arangodb-auth-bypass
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: ArangoDB <= 3.12.10.1 contains an authentication bypass in the default server.authentication-system-only=true mode (GHSA-rrgq-978q-36mq). The auth gate evaluates the raw URL while action dispatch uses URL-decoded suffixes. Encoding the leading underscore as %5f makes protected /_api/simple/* actions appear public to the auth gate but dispatches as privileged system actions, allowing unauthenticated read/write of the _users collection including password hashes.Chained with GHSA-rvhw-4hpw-9vrx (client-controlled isSystem:true in REST task creation), this yields root-context command execution in the official container image where arangod runs as UID 0.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Langflow <=1.2.x - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via validate_code

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-0768
  • CVE: CVE-2026-0768 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.0231 (percentile 0.82458) @ 2026-09-15

描述: Langflow <= 1.2.x exposes POST /api/v1/validate/code without any authentication. The endpoint calls validate_code() which exec()s user-supplied Python code. Default-argument expressions in Python execute at function-definition time, allowing arbitrary OS command execution without authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-0768

参考链接:

Divi Form Builder <=5.1.8 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload RCE

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-5524
  • CVE: CVE-2026-5524 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00922 (percentile 0.58448) @ 2026-09-15

描述: The Divi Form Builder plugin for WordPress versions 5.1.8 and prior contains an unauthenticated arbitrary file upload vulnerability in the do_image_upload() AJAX handler. The user-controlled acceptFileTypes POST parameter is injected unsanitized into a PHP regex for file extension validation. By supplying acceptFileTypes=phtml the constructed regex accepts .phtml files while the plugin's .htaccess only blocks .php, so Apache executes .phtml files as PHP. The required nonce (fb_nonce) is publicly embedded in any page containing a Divi form via the de_fb_obj JavaScript object. Uploaded shells land in /wp-content/uploads/de_fb_uploads/. Fixed in 5.1.9.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-5524

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.84666) @ 2026-09-15

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.20586 (percentile 0.97377) @ 2026-09-15

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32463
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32463 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.59417 (percentile 0.99069) @ 2026-09-15

描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463

参考链接:

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6216 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.38527 (percentile 0.9849) @ 2026-09-15

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.31138 (percentile 0.98169) @ 2026-09-15

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-20182
  • CVE: CVE-2026-20182 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.91522 (percentile 0.99807) @ 2026-09-15

描述: Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller and Manager contain an authentication bypass caused by improper peering authentication mechanism, letting unauthenticated remote attackers obtain administrative privileges, exploit requires sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-20182

参考链接:

Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-8467
  • CVE: CVE-2026-8467 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02111 (percentile 0.80798) @ 2026-09-15

描述: Phenixdigital phoenix_storybook >=0.5.0 <1.1.0 contains a code injection caused by unsanitized attribute value interpolation in HEEx template generation, letting unauthenticated remote attackers execute arbitrary code on the server, exploit requires sending crafted WebSocket event data.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-8467

参考链接:

OpenCTI < 6.9.13 - Authentication Bypass via User Impersonation

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-27960
  • CVE: CVE-2026-27960 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00584 (percentile 0.46196) @ 2026-09-15

描述: OpenCTI < 6.9.13 allows authentication bypass by supplying a Bearer token set to the admin user's internal_id UUID instead of a valid JWT. The default admin internal_id (88ec0c6a-13ce-5e39-b486-354fe4a7084f) grants full admin access to the GraphQL API, effectively bypassing all authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-27960

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.84666) @ 2026-09-15

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.20586 (percentile 0.97377) @ 2026-09-15

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32463
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32463 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.59417 (percentile 0.99069) @ 2026-09-15

描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.31138 (percentile 0.98169) @ 2026-09-15

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-9242
  • CVE: CVE-2025-9242 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.913 (percentile 0.99804) @ 2026-09-15

描述: WatchGuard Fireware OS 11.10.2 to 11.12.4_Update1, 12.0 to 12.11.3, and 2025.1 contains an out-of-bounds write caused by improper handling in Mobile User VPN and Branch Office VPN with IKEv2 dynamic gateway peer, letting remote unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-9242

参考链接:

Vite Dev Server - Directory Traversal

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-39364
  • CVE: CVE-2026-39364 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01996 (percentile 0.7961) @ 2026-09-15

描述: Vite is a modern frontend build tool. In Vite prior to versions 6.4.3, 6.3.4, and 5.4.23, a directory traversal vulnerability affects the Vite development server. When the Vite dev server is launched with the --host or server.host option, an unauthenticated attacker can craft a request with a path containing dot segments (e.g., /.vite/../<filename>) to bypass static file restrictions and access arbitrary files on the filesystem under the project root. The vulnerability allows access to files normally denied by Vite’s "server.fs.deny" setting, including sensitive files like .env, configuration files, or credentials in the project root. This issue has been fixed in versions 6.4.3, 6.3.4, and 5.4.23.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-39364

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01647 (percentile 0.75186) @ 2026-09-15

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88756) @ 2026-09-15

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01647 (percentile 0.75186) @ 2026-09-15

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88756) @ 2026-09-15

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产EPSS风险评分
OpenCTI < 6.9.13 - Authentication Bypass via Us🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00585/5
Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02115/5
Langflow <=1.2.x - Unauthenticated Remote🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02315/5
ruflo MCP Bridge - Unauthenticated RCE via termina🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.06885/5
Divi Form Builder <=5.1.8 - Unauthenticate🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00925/5
Ivanti EPMM <=12.7.0.0 - Unauthenticated C🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.81795/5
ArangoDB - Authentication Bypass via URL-Encoded U🔴 critical其他通用-5/5
Langflow <=1.2.x - Unauthenticated Remote🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02315/5
Divi Form Builder <=5.1.8 - Unauthenticate🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00925/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02635/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.20595/5
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.59425/5
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.38535/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.31145/5
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentica🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.91525/5
Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02115/5
OpenCTI < 6.9.13 - Authentication Bypass via Us🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00585/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02635/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.20595/5
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.59425/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.31145/5
WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.91305/5
Vite Dev Server - Directory Traversal🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.02004.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01654.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.03584.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01654.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.03584.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01213.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01723.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01703.5/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-27960.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-0768.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-59726.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-5524.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-1281.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/arangodb/arangodb-auth-bypass.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-0768.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-5524.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-27960.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-39364.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-27960.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-0768.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-59726.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-5524.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-1281.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/arangodb/arangodb-auth-bypass.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-0768.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-5524.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-27960.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-39364.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-15
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-15

4 个共同标签

从 316 个模板更新中精选分析 27 个高价值 POC，发现 22 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-14

4 个共同标签

从 902 个模板更新中精选分析 21 个高价值 POC，发现 12 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-13

4 个共同标签

从 301 个模板更新中精选分析 12 个高价值 POC，发现 9 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-12

4 个共同标签

从 605 个模板更新中精选分析 25 个高价值 POC，发现 19 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-11

4 个共同标签

从 321 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 20 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章