Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-28

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描威胁情报

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-28

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 624 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 594 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 24 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 18 个
  • 🟠 高危: 6 个
  • 🟡 中危: 6 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

OpenEMR < 8.0.0 - MedEx Callback Unauthenticated Token Disclosure

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-24898
  • CVE: CVE-2026-24898 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00577 (percentile 0.47372) @ 2026-10-27

描述: OpenEMR < 8.0.0 contains an unauthenticated token disclosure caused by bypassing authentication in the MedEx callback endpoint, letting unauthenticated visitors obtain MedEx API tokens and perform unauthorized actions, exploit requires crafted POST request with callback_key.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-24898

参考链接:

Traefik < 2.11.55 / 3.0.0 - 3.7.10 - Digest Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-85595
  • CVE: CVE-2026-85595 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00692 (percentile 0.52672) @ 2026-10-27

描述: Traefik < 2.11.55 contains an authentication bypass caused by digestAuth middleware returning empty secret for unknown usernames, letting attackers bypass authentication on digestAuth-protected routes without valid credentials.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-85595

参考链接:

OpenEMR < 8.0.0 - MedEx Callback Unauthenticated Token Disclosure

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-24898
  • CVE: CVE-2026-24898 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00577 (percentile 0.47372) @ 2026-10-27

描述: OpenEMR < 8.0.0 contains an unauthenticated token disclosure caused by bypassing authentication in the MedEx callback endpoint, letting unauthenticated visitors obtain MedEx API tokens and perform unauthorized actions, exploit requires crafted POST request with callback_key.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-24898

参考链接:

AhsayCBS <= 10.3.4 - Unauthenticated RCE

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-105134
  • CVE: CVE-2026-105134 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.81763 (percentile 0.99643) @ 2026-10-27

描述: Ahsay AhsayCBS <= 10.3.2 contains a command injection caused by manipulation of the &quot;random&quot; argument in /rps/api/json/UpdateReceivers.do of Replication Receiver, letting remote attackers execute OS commands, exploit requires crafted request

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-105134

参考链接:

Gotenberg <= 8.30.1 - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-40281
  • CVE: CVE-2026-40281 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02258 (percentile 0.82877) @ 2026-10-27

描述: Gotenberg through 8.30.1 sanitizes only the keys of the JSON metadata submitted to the PDF metadata write endpoint, leaving the values unvalidated. A newline inside a metadata value is written straight to the ExifTool process standard input, where it terminates the current argument and starts a new one, letting an unauthenticated attacker inject arbitrary ExifTool arguments and execute operating system commands through an advanced formatting expression.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-40281

参考链接:

Node.js Brotli Request-Body Integer Overflow (node2shell) - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-111497
  • CVE: CVE-2026-111497 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.55483 (percentile 0.9903) @ 2026-10-27

描述: A buffer overflow vulnerability in the Brotli decoder (c/dec/decode.c) in Google Brotli versions 1.0.3 through 1.2.0 on all platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to corrupt adjacent decoder state memory, disclose sensitive memory contents, cause a denial of service, or potentially execute arbitrary code using a crafted Brotli-compressed stream. Users need to update any Brotli libraries or binaries between 1.0.3 through 1.2.0 to the latest available version: 1.0.10 or 1.1.1 or 1.2.1.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-111497

参考链接:

AhsayCBS <= 10.3.4 - Unauthenticated RCE

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-105134
  • CVE: CVE-2026-105134 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.81763 (percentile 0.99643) @ 2026-10-27

描述: Ahsay AhsayCBS <= 10.3.2 contains a command injection caused by manipulation of the &quot;random&quot; argument in /rps/api/json/UpdateReceivers.do of Replication Receiver, letting remote attackers execute OS commands, exploit requires crafted request

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-105134

参考链接:

Gotenberg <= 8.30.1 - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-40281
  • CVE: CVE-2026-40281 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02258 (percentile 0.82877) @ 2026-10-27

描述: Gotenberg through 8.30.1 sanitizes only the keys of the JSON metadata submitted to the PDF metadata write endpoint, leaving the values unvalidated. A newline inside a metadata value is written straight to the ExifTool process standard input, where it terminates the current argument and starts a new one, letting an unauthenticated attacker inject arbitrary ExifTool arguments and execute operating system commands through an advanced formatting expression.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-40281

参考链接:

Node.js Brotli Request-Body Integer Overflow (node2shell) - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-111497
  • CVE: CVE-2026-111497 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.55483 (percentile 0.9903) @ 2026-10-27

描述: A buffer overflow vulnerability in the Brotli decoder (c/dec/decode.c) in Google Brotli versions 1.0.3 through 1.2.0 on all platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to corrupt adjacent decoder state memory, disclose sensitive memory contents, cause a denial of service, or potentially execute arbitrary code using a crafted Brotli-compressed stream. Users need to update any Brotli libraries or binaries between 1.0.3 through 1.2.0 to the latest available version: 1.0.10 or 1.1.1 or 1.2.1.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-111497

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.8541) @ 2026-10-27

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.20965 (percentile 0.97549) @ 2026-10-27

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6216 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.47775 (percentile 0.98844) @ 2026-10-27

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.3185 (percentile 0.98292) @ 2026-10-27

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-8467
  • CVE: CVE-2026-8467 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02111 (percentile 0.81699) @ 2026-10-27

描述: Phenixdigital phoenix_storybook >=0.5.0 <1.1.0 contains a code injection caused by unsanitized attribute value interpolation in HEEx template generation, letting unauthenticated remote attackers execute arbitrary code on the server, exploit requires sending crafted WebSocket event data.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-8467

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.8541) @ 2026-10-27

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.20965 (percentile 0.97549) @ 2026-10-27

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6216 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.47775 (percentile 0.98844) @ 2026-10-27

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.3185 (percentile 0.98292) @ 2026-10-27

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

WP Booking System <= 2.1.0.3 - Unauthenticated Email Log Disclosure

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-108123
  • CVE: CVE-2026-108123 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00318 (percentile 0.24531) @ 2026-10-27

描述: WP Booking System – Booking Calendar plugin for WordPress <= 2.1.0.3 contains an authorization bypass caused by improper user authorization verification, letting unauthenticated attackers read stored notification emails exposing customer PII, exploit requires authenticated Subscriber-level user.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-108123

参考链接:

WP Booking System <= 2.1.0.3 - Unauthenticated Email Log Disclosure

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-108123
  • CVE: CVE-2026-108123 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00318 (percentile 0.24531) @ 2026-10-27

描述: WP Booking System – Booking Calendar plugin for WordPress <= 2.1.0.3 contains an authorization bypass caused by improper user authorization verification, letting unauthenticated attackers read stored notification emails exposing customer PII, exploit requires authenticated Subscriber-level user.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-108123

参考链接:

Read More & Accordion <= 3.5.7 - Authenticated Privilege Escalation

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-7467
  • CVE: CVE-2026-7467 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.01313 (percentile 0.70542) @ 2026-10-27

描述: The Read More & Accordion (expand-maker) plugin for WordPress through 3.5.7 allows privilege escalation due to improper validation in the importData AJAX handler (yrm_import_data action). An authenticated user with plugin access can upload a crafted JSON attachment to insert arbitrary rows into WordPress database tables, including those that control user roles and capabilities, potentially leading to site takeover.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-7467

参考链接:

Read More & Accordion <= 3.5.7 - Authenticated Privilege Escalation

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-7467
  • CVE: CVE-2026-7467 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.01313 (percentile 0.70542) @ 2026-10-27

描述: The Read More & Accordion (expand-maker) plugin for WordPress through 3.5.7 allows privilege escalation due to improper validation in the importData AJAX handler (yrm_import_data action). An authenticated user with plugin access can upload a crafted JSON attachment to insert arbitrary rows into WordPress database tables, including those that control user roles and capabilities, potentially leading to site takeover.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-7467

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01647 (percentile 0.76345) @ 2026-10-27

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.04308 (percentile 0.91103) @ 2026-10-27

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产EPSS风险评分
OpenEMR < 8.0.0 - MedEx Callback Unauthenticate🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00585/5
Traefik < 2.11.55 / 3.0.0 - 3.7.10 - Digest Aut🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00695/5
OpenEMR < 8.0.0 - MedEx Callback Unauthenticate🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00585/5
AhsayCBS <= 10.3.4 - Unauthenticated RCE🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.81765/5
Gotenberg <= 8.30.1 - Remote Code Executio🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02265/5
Node.js Brotli Request-Body Integer Overflow (node🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.55485/5
AhsayCBS <= 10.3.4 - Unauthenticated RCE🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.81765/5
Gotenberg <= 8.30.1 - Remote Code Executio🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02265/5
Node.js Brotli Request-Body Integer Overflow (node🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.55485/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02635/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.20975/5
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.47785/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.31855/5
Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02115/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02635/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.20975/5
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.47785/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.31855/5
WP Booking System <= 2.1.0.3 - Unauthentic🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00324.5/5
WP Booking System <= 2.1.0.3 - Unauthentic🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00324.5/5
Read More & Accordion <= 3.5.7 - Authentic🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.01314.5/5
Read More & Accordion <= 3.5.7 - Authentic🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.01314.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01654.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.04314.5/5
Docker-Proxy hubcmdui - Missing Authentication on🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.00263.5/5
Docker-Proxy hubcmdui - Missing Authentication on🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.00263.5/5
Docker-Proxy hubcmdui - Missing Authentication on🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.00263.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01233.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01723.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01823.5/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-24898.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-85595.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-24898.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-105134.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-40281.yaml -t http/javascript/cves/2026/CVE-2026-111497.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-105134.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-40281.yaml -t http/javascript/cves/2026/CVE-2026-111497.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-108123.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-108123.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-7467.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-7467.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-24898.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-85595.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-24898.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-105134.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-40281.yaml -t http/javascript/cves/2026/CVE-2026-111497.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-105134.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-40281.yaml -t http/javascript/cves/2026/CVE-2026-111497.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-108123.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-108123.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-7467.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-7467.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-116070.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-116070.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-116070.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-27
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-27

4 个共同标签

从 633 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 27 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-26

4 个共同标签

从 607 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 27 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-25

4 个共同标签

从 612 个模板更新中精选分析 23 个高价值 POC，发现 17 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-24

4 个共同标签

从 933 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 27 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-23

4 个共同标签

从 626 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 27 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章