Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-06

📊 智能筛选概况

• 发现变更: 332 个模板更新
• 精选分析: 29 个高价值 POC
• 智能跳过: 303 个低优先级模板
• 高风险漏洞: 11 个
• 主要类别: CVE漏洞(29)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

• 🔴 严重: 3 个
• 🟠 高危: 8 个
• 🟡 中危: 18 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

GitHub Enterprise - SAML Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-9487
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed SAML SSO authentication to be bypassed resulting in unauthorized provisioning of users and access to the instance. Exploitation required the encrypted assertions feature to be enabled, and the attacker would require direct network access as well as a signed SAML response or metadata document. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.15 and was fixed in versions 3.11.16, 3.12.10, 3.13.5, and 3.14.2. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Ivanti Connect Secure - Stack-based Buffer Overflow

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-22457
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.6, Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.4, and Ivanti ZTA Gateways before version 22.8R2.2 contain a stack-based buffer overflow caused by improper input handling, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code without authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-22457

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: GitLab 平台
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Apache Tomcat WebSocket Frame Payload Length Validation Denial of Service

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2020-13935
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56, and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104 contain a vulnerability in the WebSocket module where the payload length of WebSocket frames is not correctly validated. This can lead to an infinite loop when processing frames with invalid payload lengths. Attackers can exploit this flaw by sending multiple malicious requests, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) on the affected Tomcat instance.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2020-13935

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Sudo Baron Samedit - Local Privilege Escalation

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2021-3156
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Sudo before 1.9.5p2 contains an off-by-one error that can result in a heap-based buffer overflow, which allows privilege escalation to root via "sudoedit -s" and a command-line argument that ends with a single backslash character.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2021-3156

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-6246
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the __vsyslog_internal function of the glibc library. This function is called by the syslog and vsyslog functions. This issue occurs when the openlog function was not called, or called with the ident argument set to NULL, and the program name (the basename of argv[0]) is bigger than 1024 bytes, resulting in an application crash or local privilege escalation. This issue affects glibc 2.36 and newer.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-6246

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

sqlparse - Denial of Service

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-4340
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Passing a heavily nested list to sqlparse.parse() leads to a Denial of Service due to RecursionError.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-4340

参考链接:

• 参考资料

HTTP API DOM - XSS on JSONP callback

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-29882
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: SRS is a simple, high-efficiency, real-time video server. SRS's /api/v1/vhosts/vid-<id>?callback=<payload> endpoint didn't filter the callback function name which led to injecting malicious javascript payloads and executing XSS ( Cross-Site Scripting). This vulnerability is fixed in 5.0.210 and 6.0.121.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-29882

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 - Cross-Site Scripting

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2002-1131
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Virtual Keyboard plugin for SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 is prone to a cross-site scripting vulnerability because it fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2002-1131

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Squirrelmail <=1.4.6 - Local File Inclusion

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2006-2842
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: SquirrelMail 1.4.6 and earlier versions are susceptible to a PHP local file inclusion vulnerability in functions/plugin.php if register_globals is enabled and magic_quotes_gpc is disabled. This allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the plugins array parameter.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2006-2842

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

WordPress Sniplets 1.1.2 - Local File Inclusion

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2008-1059
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: WordPress 站点
• 预估影响: 数千万个

描述: PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in modules/syntax_highlight.php in the Sniplets 1.1.2 and 1.2.2 plugin for WordPress allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the libpath parameter.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2008-1059

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

📋 完整模板列表

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22457.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2020/CVE-2020-13935.yaml -t code/cves/2021/CVE-2021-3156.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-4340.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t http/cves/2002/CVE-2002-1131.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-2842.yaml -t http/cves/2008/CVE-2008-1059.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22457.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2020/CVE-2020-13935.yaml -t code/cves/2021/CVE-2021-3156.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-4340.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t http/cves/2002/CVE-2002-1131.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-2842.yaml -t http/cves/2008/CVE-2008-1059.yaml -t http/cves/2024/CVE-2024-43971.yaml -t http/cves/2024/CVE-2024-30194.yaml -t headless/cves/2018/CVE-2018-25031.yaml -t headless/cves/2022/CVE-2022-29455-headless.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/cves/2000/CVE-2000-0114.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-0519.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-1965.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3128.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3634.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-4385.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-1681.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-3392.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-0885.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-4504.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-4556.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-5728.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试