Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-11-11

📊 智能筛选概况

• 发现变更: 398 个模板更新
• 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
• 智能跳过: 368 个低优先级模板
• 高风险漏洞: 26 个
• 主要类别: CVE漏洞(28), 其他(2)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

• 🔴 严重: 18 个
• 🟠 高危: 8 个
• 🟡 中危: 2 个
• 🔵 低危: 2 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

Mongoose < 8.8.3 - Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-53900
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Mongoose before 8.8.3 can improperly use $where in match, leading to search injection.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-53900

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-47575
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A missing authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests to the fgfmd daemon. This vulnerability affects FortiManager versions 7.6.0, 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, 7.0.0 through 7.0.12, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, 6.2.0 through 6.2.12, and all versions of 6.0.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-47575

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-9242
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: WatchGuard Fireware OS 11.10.2 to 11.12.4_Update1, 12.0 to 12.11.3, and 2025.1 contains an out-of-bounds write caused by improper handling in Mobile User VPN and Branch Office VPN with IKEv2 dynamic gateway peer, letting remote unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-9242

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Mongoose < 8.8.3 - Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-53900
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Mongoose before 8.8.3 can improperly use $where in match, leading to search injection.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-53900

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Jenkins CLI - Java Deserialization

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2017-1000353
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: Jenkins CI/CD
• 预估影响: 数十万个

描述: Jenkins versions 2.56 and earlier as well as 2.46.1 LTS and earlier are vulnerable to an unauthenticated remote code execution. An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability allowed attackers to transfer a serialized Java SignedObject object to the Jenkins CLI, that would be deserialized using a new ObjectInputStream, bypassing the existing blacklist-based protection mechanism. We're fixing this issue by adding SignedObject to the blacklist. We're also backporting the new HTTP CLI protocol from Jenkins 2.54 to LTS 2.46.2, and deprecating the remoting-based (i.e. Java serialization) CLI protocol, disabling it by default.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2017-1000353

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Microsoft SharePoint - Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2019-0604
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Microsoft SharePoint contains a remote code execution caused by failure to check the source markup of an application package, letting remote attackers execute arbitrary code, exploit requires sending malicious application package.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2019-0604

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Microsoft .NET Framework - Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2020-0646
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Microsoft .NET Framework fails to validate input properly, aka '.NET Framework Remote Code Execution Injection Vulnerability'.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2020-0646

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Fortinet SSL-VPN - Heap-Based Buffer Overflow

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2022-42475
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] in FortiOS SSL-VPN (versions 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, 7.0.0 through 7.0.8, 6.4.0 through 6.4.10, 6.2.0 through 6.2.11, 6.0.15 and earlier) and FortiProxy SSL-VPN (versions 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.7 and earlier) may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specifically crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2022-42475

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Abandoned Cart Lite for WooCommerce - Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-2986
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: WordPress 站点
• 预估影响: 数千万个

描述: The Abandoned Cart Lite for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authentication bypass in versions up to, and including, 5.14.2. This is due to insufficient encryption on the user being supplied during the abandoned cart link decode through the plugin. This allows unauthenticated attackers to log in as users who have abandoned the cart, who are typically customers. Further security hardening was introduced in version 5.15.1 that ensures sites are no longer vulnerable through historical check-out links, and additional hardening was introduced in version 5.15.2 that ensured null key values wouldn't permit the authentication bypass.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-2986

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

OwnCloud - WebDAV API Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-49105
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: An issue was discovered in ownCloud owncloud/core before 10.13.1. An attacker can access, modify, or delete any file without authentication if the username of a victim is known, and the victim has no signing-key configured. This occurs because pre-signed URLs can be accepted even when no signing-key is configured for the owner of the files. The earliest affected version is 10.6.0.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-49105

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Synology BeeStation BST150-4T - Unauthenticated Command Injection

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-10443
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('Command Injection') vulnerability in Task Manager component in Synology BeePhotos before 1.0.2-10026 and 1.1.0-10053 and Synology Photos before 1.6.2-0720 and 1.7.0-0795 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-10443

参考链接:

• 参考资料

Privileged Remote Access & Remote Support - Command Injection

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-12356
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A critical vulnerability has been discovered in Privileged Remote Access (PRA) and Remote Support (RS) products which can allow an unauthenticated attacker to inject commands that are run as a site user.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-12356

参考链接:

• 参考资料

Zabbix Server - Time-Based Blind SQL injection

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-22120
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Zabbix server can execute commands for configured scripts. After executing a command, an audit entry is added to the "Audit Log". Due to the "clientip" field not being sanitized, it is possible to inject SQL into "clientip" and exploit a time-based blind SQL injection vulnerability.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-22120

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

XZ - Embedded Malicious Code

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-3094
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Malicious code was discovered in the upstream tarballs of xz, starting with version 5.6.0. Through a series of complex obfuscations, the liblzma build process extracts a prebuilt object file from a disguised test file existing in the source code, which is then used to modify specific functions in the liblzma code. This results in a modified liblzma library that can be used by any software linked against this library, intercepting and modifying the data interaction with this library.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-3094

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-45409
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: GitLab 平台
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. Ruby-SAML in <= 12.2 and 1.13.0 <= 1.16.0 does not properly verify the signature of the SAML Response.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-45409

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

InvoiceShelf <= 1.3.0 - PHP Deserialization

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-55556
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: InvoiceShelf version 1.3.0 and below contains an unauthenticated PHP deserialization vulnerability that can lead to remote code execution. An attacker with knowledge of the APP_KEY can achieve remote command execution on the server through Laravel's cookie deserialization. While the vulnerability is severe, it is partially mitigated in default installations as the APP_KEY is regenerated during setup.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-55556

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Uptime-Kuma - Local File Inclusion (LFI)

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-56331
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Uptime Kuma has an Improper URL Handling vulnerability that can be exploited through the "real-browser" feature. By providing a URL using the file:/// protocol (e.g., file:///etc/passwd), an attacker can obtain a screenshot of local sensitive files, because the user input is not validated by the server.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-56331

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Sudo <= 1.8.27 - Security Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2019-14287
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: In Sudo before 1.8.28, an attacker with access to a Runas ALL sudoer account can bypass certain policy blacklists and session PAM modules, and can cause incorrect logging, by invoking sudo with a crafted user ID. For example, this allows bypass of !root configuration, and USER= logging, for a "sudo -u #$((0xffffffff))" command.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2019-14287

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Apache Tomcat WebSocket Frame Payload Length Validation Denial of Service

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2020-13935
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56, and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104 contain a vulnerability in the WebSocket module where the payload length of WebSocket frames is not correctly validated. This can lead to an infinite loop when processing frames with invalid payload lengths. Attackers can exploit this flaw by sending multiple malicious requests, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) on the affected Tomcat instance.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2020-13935

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Sudo Baron Samedit - Local Privilege Escalation

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2021-3156
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Sudo before 1.9.5p2 contains an off-by-one error that can result in a heap-based buffer overflow, which allows privilege escalation to root via "sudoedit -s" and a command-line argument that ends with a single backslash character.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2021-3156

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GameOver(lay) - Local Privilege Escalation in Ubuntu Kernel

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-2640
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A local privilege escalation vulnerability has been discovered in the OverlayFS module of the Ubuntu kernel. This vulnerability could allow an attacker with local access to escalate their privileges, potentially gaining root-like access to the system.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-2640

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Looney Tunables Linux - Local Privilege Escalation

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-4911
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A buffer overflow was discovered in the GNU C Library's dynamic loader ld.so while processing the GLIBC_TUNABLES environment variable. This issue could allow a local attacker to use maliciously crafted GLIBC_TUNABLES environment variables when launching binaries with SUID permission to execute code with elevated privileges.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-4911

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-6246
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the __vsyslog_internal function of the glibc library. This function is called by the syslog and vsyslog functions. This issue occurs when the openlog function was not called, or called with the ident argument set to NULL, and the program name (the basename of argv[0]) is bigger than 1024 bytes, resulting in an application crash or local privilege escalation. This issue affects glibc 2.36 and newer.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-6246

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

sqlparse - Denial of Service

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-4340
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Passing a heavily nested list to sqlparse.parse() leads to a Denial of Service due to RecursionError.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-4340

参考链接:

• 参考资料

OpenSSL Heartbleed Vulnerability

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2014-0160
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Heartbleed bug allows anyone on the Internet to read the memory of the systems protected by the vulnerable versions of the OpenSSL software. This compromises the secret keys used to identify the service providers and to encrypt the traffic, the names and passwords of the users, and the actual content. This allows attackers to eavesdrop on communications, steal data directly from the services and users, and impersonate services and users.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料

📋 完整模板列表

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2024/CVE-2024-53900.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-47575.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t http/cves/2024/CVE-2024-53900.yaml -t code/cves/2017/CVE-2017-1000353.yaml -t code/cves/2019/CVE-2019-0604.yaml -t code/cves/2020/CVE-2020-0646.yaml -t code/cves/2022/CVE-2022-42475.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-2986.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-49105.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-10443.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-12356.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-22120.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-3094.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-45409.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-55556.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-56331.yaml -t code/cves/2019/CVE-2019-14287.yaml -t code/cves/2020/CVE-2020-13935.yaml -t code/cves/2021/CVE-2021-3156.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-2640.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-4911.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-4340.yaml -t code/cves/2014/CVE-2014-0160.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板
nuclei -t http/cves/2024/CVE-2024-53900.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-47575.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t http/cves/2024/CVE-2024-53900.yaml -t code/cves/2017/CVE-2017-1000353.yaml -t code/cves/2019/CVE-2019-0604.yaml -t code/cves/2020/CVE-2020-0646.yaml -t code/cves/2022/CVE-2022-42475.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-2986.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-49105.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-10443.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-12356.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-22120.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-3094.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-45409.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-55556.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-56331.yaml -t code/cves/2019/CVE-2019-14287.yaml -t code/cves/2020/CVE-2020-13935.yaml -t code/cves/2021/CVE-2021-3156.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-2640.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-4911.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-4340.yaml -t code/cves/2014/CVE-2014-0160.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-4302.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-4302.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/smuggling/cl-te-http-smuggling.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/smuggling/te-cl-http-smuggling.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试