Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-23
📊 智能筛选概况
- 发现变更: 626 个模板更新
- 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
- 智能跳过: 596 个低优先级模板
- 高风险漏洞: 27 个
- 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)
💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。
严重程度分布
- 🔴 严重: 23 个
- 🟠 高危: 4 个
- 🟡 中危: 3 个
🔍 重点漏洞分析
Product Input Fields for WooCommerce < 2.0.2 - Arbitrary File Upload to RCE
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-19089 - CVE:
CVE-2026-19089(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00831 (percentile 0.57137) @ 2026-10-22
描述: WooCommerce WordPress plugin < 2.0.2 contains an unrestricted file upload vulnerability caused by lack of validation on uploaded file types when accepted-types setting is empty, letting unauthenticated attackers upload arbitrary files and achieve remote code execution on servers ignoring directory access rules, exploit requires no authentication.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-19089
参考链接:
SEBLOD for Joomla < 3.30.0/< 4.7.0/< 6.0.1 - Path Traversal
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-66914 - CVE:
CVE-2026-66914(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: Joomla 站点
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.00518 (percentile 0.43198) @ 2026-10-22
描述: Joomla Extension SEBLOD < 3.30.0, < 4.7.0, < 6.0.1 contains an unauthenticated path traversal caused by improper validation of file paths, letting unauthenticated attackers download files inside and outside the webroot, exploit requires no authentication.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-66914
参考链接:
Bricksforge WordPress Plugin <=3.1.8.9 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-85097 - CVE:
CVE-2026-85097(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00312 (percentile 0.2284) @ 2026-10-22
描述: Bricksforge WordPress plugin versions up to and including 3.1.8.9 are vulnerable to unauthenticated arbitrary file upload leading to remote code execution. An attacker obtains a wp_rest nonce via the bricksforge_regenerate_nonce AJAX action, uploads a GIF/PHP polyglot through the form_file_upload REST endpoint with the nonce in the X-WP-Nonce header, then triggers form_submit to copy the file to the WordPress media uploads directory where it executes as PHP. Requires a published Bricks Pro Form with a file field on the target; the post_id, form_id, and field_id template variables must be set accordingly.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-85097
参考链接:
Bricksforge WordPress Plugin <=3.1.8.9 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-85097 - CVE:
CVE-2026-85097(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00312 (percentile 0.2284) @ 2026-10-22
描述: Bricksforge WordPress plugin versions up to and including 3.1.8.9 are vulnerable to unauthenticated arbitrary file upload leading to remote code execution. An attacker obtains a wp_rest nonce via the bricksforge_regenerate_nonce AJAX action, uploads a GIF/PHP polyglot through the form_file_upload REST endpoint with the nonce in the X-WP-Nonce header, then triggers form_submit to copy the file to the WordPress media uploads directory where it executes as PHP. Requires a published Bricks Pro Form with a file field on the target; the post_id, form_id, and field_id template variables must be set accordingly.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-85097
参考链接:
PHP2Shell (CVE-2026-109618/CVE-2026-109619) - Active Crash Detection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-109618 - CVE:
CVE-2026-109618(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.05307 (percentile 0.92563) @ 2026-10-22
描述: PHP uses longjmp() for out-of-memory (OOM) errors to exit the current context and abort handling of the request. Some contexts may not properly account for this scenario and leave request memory in an uninitialized state before performing an allocation. The subsequent request cleanup procedure may read or branch on this memory. Multiple OOM strategies can consistently trigger this condition and lead to remote code execution (RCE).
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-109618
参考链接:
WordPress OttoKit Plugin <= 1.1.40 - Unauthenticated Privilege Escalation via connection-denied Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-110372 - CVE:
CVE-2026-110372(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00268 (percentile 0.17958) @ 2026-10-22
描述: OttoKit (formerly SureTriggers) WordPress plugin <= 1.1.40 unauthenticated privilege escalation. When an admin denies the OttoKit SaaS connection, the plugin stores the fixed public string 'connection-denied' as the site API secret. The RestController::autheticate_user permission callback reads the 'st_authorization' request header, strips a 'Bearer ' prefix via sscanf($token,'Bearer %s'), then hash_equals() it against the stored secret. An attacker who sends 'st-authorization: Bearer connection-denied' is authenticated to the automation REST API and can create administrator accounts. Fixed in 1.1.41.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-110372
参考链接:
Piotnet Forms Pro <= 2.1.40 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload RCE
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-4883 - CVE:
CVE-2026-4883(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00869 (percentile 0.58362) @ 2026-10-22
描述: Piotnet Forms WordPress plugin <= 2.1.40 contains an unrestricted file upload vulnerability caused by incomplete file extension blacklist in 'piotnetforms_ajax_form_builder', letting unauthenticated attackers upload arbitrary files, exploit requires a file field in the form.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-4883
参考链接:
Bricksforge WordPress Plugin <=3.1.8.9 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-85097 - CVE:
CVE-2026-85097(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00312 (percentile 0.2284) @ 2026-10-22
描述: Bricksforge WordPress plugin versions up to and including 3.1.8.9 are vulnerable to unauthenticated arbitrary file upload leading to remote code execution. An attacker obtains a wp_rest nonce via the bricksforge_regenerate_nonce AJAX action, uploads a GIF/PHP polyglot through the form_file_upload REST endpoint with the nonce in the X-WP-Nonce header, then triggers form_submit to copy the file to the WordPress media uploads directory where it executes as PHP. Requires a published Bricks Pro Form with a file field on the target; the post_id, form_id, and field_id template variables must be set accordingly.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-85097
参考链接:
Apache Camel camel-coap - Remote Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-33453 - CVE:
CVE-2026-33453(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: Apache 服务器
- 预估影响: 数百万台
- EPSS: 0.07164 (percentile 0.94269) @ 2026-10-22
描述: Apache Camel camel-coap component 4.14.0-4.14.5, 4.18.0 before 4.18.1, and 4.19.0 contains a remote code execution caused by improper header filtering of CoAP URI query parameters, letting unauthenticated attackers inject headers and execute arbitrary OS commands via header-sensitive producers, exploit requires sending a single CoAP UDP packet.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-33453
参考链接:
PHP2Shell (CVE-2026-109618/CVE-2026-109619) - Active Crash Detection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-109618 - CVE:
CVE-2026-109618(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.05307 (percentile 0.92563) @ 2026-10-22
描述: PHP uses longjmp() for out-of-memory (OOM) errors to exit the current context and abort handling of the request. Some contexts may not properly account for this scenario and leave request memory in an uninitialized state before performing an allocation. The subsequent request cleanup procedure may read or branch on this memory. Multiple OOM strategies can consistently trigger this condition and lead to remote code execution (RCE).
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-109618
参考链接:
WordPress OttoKit Plugin <= 1.1.40 - Unauthenticated Privilege Escalation via connection-denied Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-110372 - CVE:
CVE-2026-110372(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00268 (percentile 0.17958) @ 2026-10-22
描述: OttoKit (formerly SureTriggers) WordPress plugin <= 1.1.40 unauthenticated privilege escalation. When an admin denies the OttoKit SaaS connection, the plugin stores the fixed public string 'connection-denied' as the site API secret. The RestController::autheticate_user permission callback reads the 'st_authorization' request header, strips a 'Bearer ' prefix via sscanf($token,'Bearer %s'), then hash_equals() it against the stored secret. An attacker who sends 'st-authorization: Bearer connection-denied' is authenticated to the automation REST API and can create administrator accounts. Fixed in 1.1.41.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-110372
参考链接:
Piotnet Forms Pro <= 2.1.40 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload RCE
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-4883 - CVE:
CVE-2026-4883(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00869 (percentile 0.58362) @ 2026-10-22
描述: Piotnet Forms WordPress plugin <= 2.1.40 contains an unrestricted file upload vulnerability caused by incomplete file extension blacklist in 'piotnetforms_ajax_form_builder', letting unauthenticated attackers upload arbitrary files, exploit requires a file field in the form.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-4883
参考链接:
Bricksforge WordPress Plugin <=3.1.8.9 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-85097 - CVE:
CVE-2026-85097(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00312 (percentile 0.2284) @ 2026-10-22
描述: Bricksforge WordPress plugin versions up to and including 3.1.8.9 are vulnerable to unauthenticated arbitrary file upload leading to remote code execution. An attacker obtains a wp_rest nonce via the bricksforge_regenerate_nonce AJAX action, uploads a GIF/PHP polyglot through the form_file_upload REST endpoint with the nonce in the X-WP-Nonce header, then triggers form_submit to copy the file to the WordPress media uploads directory where it executes as PHP. Requires a published Bricks Pro Form with a file field on the target; the post_id, form_id, and field_id template variables must be set accordingly.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-85097
参考链接:
Apache Camel camel-coap - Remote Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-33453 - CVE:
CVE-2026-33453(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: Apache 服务器
- 预估影响: 数百万台
- EPSS: 0.07164 (percentile 0.94269) @ 2026-10-22
描述: Apache Camel camel-coap component 4.14.0-4.14.5, 4.18.0 before 4.18.1, and 4.19.0 contains a remote code execution caused by improper header filtering of CoAP URI query parameters, letting unauthenticated attackers inject headers and execute arbitrary OS commands via header-sensitive producers, exploit requires sending a single CoAP UDP packet.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-33453
参考链接:
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-1550 - CVE:
CVE-2025-1550(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.85369) @ 2026-10-22
描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-25291 - CVE:
CVE-2025-25291(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.20965 (percentile 0.9756) @ 2026-10-22
描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291
参考链接:
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6216 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6216(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.47775 (percentile 0.9885) @ 2026-10-22
描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216
参考链接:
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-68926 - CVE:
CVE-2025-68926(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.3185 (percentile 0.98304) @ 2026-10-22
描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926
参考链接:
Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-8467 - CVE:
CVE-2026-8467(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.02059 (percentile 0.81156) @ 2026-10-22
描述: Phenixdigital phoenix_storybook >=0.5.0 <1.1.0 contains a code injection caused by unsanitized attribute value interpolation in HEEx template generation, letting unauthenticated remote attackers execute arbitrary code on the server, exploit requires sending crafted WebSocket event data.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-8467
参考链接:
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-1550 - CVE:
CVE-2025-1550(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.85369) @ 2026-10-22
描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-25291 - CVE:
CVE-2025-25291(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.20965 (percentile 0.9756) @ 2026-10-22
描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291
参考链接:
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6216 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6216(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.47775 (percentile 0.9885) @ 2026-10-22
描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216
参考链接:
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-68926 - CVE:
CVE-2025-68926(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.3185 (percentile 0.98304) @ 2026-10-22
描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926
参考链接:
jotty.page < 1.22.0 - Path Traversal
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-42564 - CVE:
CVE-2026-42564(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.00428 (percentile 0.36014) @ 2026-10-22
描述: jotty·page < 1.22.0 contains a path traversal caused by lack of validation on filename parameter in /api/app-icons/[filename], letting unauthenticated attackers read arbitrary files outside intended directory.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-42564
参考链接:
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6984 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6984(2025) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01647 (percentile 0.76279) @ 2026-10-22
描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984
参考链接:
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-10795 - CVE:
CVE-2026-10795(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.03635 (percentile 0.89499) @ 2026-10-22
描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795
参考链接:
Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalation via AF_ALG
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-31431 - CVE:
CVE-2026-31431(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.03437 (percentile 0.88901) @ 2026-10-22
描述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-31431
参考链接:
📋 完整模板列表
| 模板名称 | 严重程度 | 类别 | 影响资产 | EPSS | 风险评分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product Input Fields for WooCommerce < 2.0.2 - | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0083 | 5/5 |
| SEBLOD for Joomla < 3.30.0/< 4.7.0/< 6.0. | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | Joomla 站点 | 0.0052 | 5/5 |
| Bricksforge WordPress Plugin <=3.1.8.9 - U | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0031 | 5/5 |
| Bricksforge WordPress Plugin <=3.1.8.9 - U | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0031 | 5/5 |
| PHP2Shell (CVE-2026-109618/CVE-2026-109619) - Acti | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0531 | 5/5 |
| WordPress OttoKit Plugin <= 1.1.40 - Unaut | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0027 | 5/5 |
| Piotnet Forms Pro <= 2.1.40 - Unauthentica | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0087 | 5/5 |
| Bricksforge WordPress Plugin <=3.1.8.9 - U | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0031 | 5/5 |
| Apache Camel camel-coap - Remote Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | Apache 服务器 | 0.0716 | 5/5 |
| PHP2Shell (CVE-2026-109618/CVE-2026-109619) - Acti | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0531 | 5/5 |
| WordPress OttoKit Plugin <= 1.1.40 - Unaut | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0027 | 5/5 |
| Piotnet Forms Pro <= 2.1.40 - Unauthentica | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0087 | 5/5 |
| Bricksforge WordPress Plugin <=3.1.8.9 - U | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0031 | 5/5 |
| Apache Camel camel-coap - Remote Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | Apache 服务器 | 0.0716 | 5/5 |
| Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0263 | 5/5 |
| GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 0.2097 | 5/5 |
| Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.4778 | 5/5 |
| RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.3185 | 5/5 |
| Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0206 | 5/5 |
| Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0263 | 5/5 |
| GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 0.2097 | 5/5 |
| Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.4778 | 5/5 |
| RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.3185 | 5/5 |
| jotty.page < 1.22.0 - Path Traversal | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0043 | 4.5/5 |
| langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0165 | 4.5/5 |
| UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0364 | 4.5/5 |
| Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalatio | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0344 | 4.5/5 |
| Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0123 | 3.5/5 |
| Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0172 | 3.5/5 |
| Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0179 | 3.5/5 |
🛡️ 安全建议
🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理
🔧 扫描建议
建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：
# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-19089.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-66914.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-85097.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-85097.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-109618.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-110372.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-4883.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-85097.yaml -t javascript/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33453.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-109618.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-110372.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-4883.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-85097.yaml -t javascript/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33453.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-42564.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -u target-url
# 扫描所有今日新增模板
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-19089.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-66914.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-85097.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-85097.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-109618.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-110372.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-4883.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-85097.yaml -t javascript/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33453.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-109618.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-110372.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-4883.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-85097.yaml -t javascript/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33453.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-42564.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -u target-url
本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates
扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试