Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-27
📊 智能筛选概况
- 发现变更: 629 个模板更新
- 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
- 智能跳过: 599 个低优先级模板
- 高风险漏洞: 27 个
- 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)
💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。
严重程度分布
- 🔴 严重: 21 个
- 🟠 高危: 6 个
- 🟡 中危: 3 个
🔍 重点漏洞分析
Elementor Pro <=4.2.1 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload via Form Handler
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-32475 - CVE:
CVE-2026-32475(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00645 (percentile 0.48284) @ 2026-08-26
描述: Elementor Pro plugin for WordPress in versions <=4.2.1 is vulnerable to unauthenticated arbitrary file upload in the Forms module File Upload field. The validation() and process_field() methods iterate over submitted file entries with different early-exit logic for UPLOAD_ERR_NO_FILE entries. When an attacker submits two file parts for the same upload field — an empty first entry (blank filename triggering UPLOAD_ERR_NO_FILE) followed by a payload — validation() returns early after the empty entry without ever type-checking the payload, while process_field() only skips (continue) the empty entry and moves the payload to wp-content/uploads/elementor/forms/. The AJAX action elementor_pro_forms_send_form requires no authentication or nonce.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-32475
参考链接:
Elementor Pro <=4.2.1 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload via Form Handler
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-32475 - CVE:
CVE-2026-32475(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00645 (percentile 0.48284) @ 2026-08-26
描述: Elementor Pro plugin for WordPress in versions <=4.2.1 is vulnerable to unauthenticated arbitrary file upload in the Forms module File Upload field. The validation() and process_field() methods iterate over submitted file entries with different early-exit logic for UPLOAD_ERR_NO_FILE entries. When an attacker submits two file parts for the same upload field — an empty first entry (blank filename triggering UPLOAD_ERR_NO_FILE) followed by a payload — validation() returns early after the empty entry without ever type-checking the payload, while process_field() only skips (continue) the empty entry and moves the payload to wp-content/uploads/elementor/forms/. The AJAX action elementor_pro_forms_send_form requires no authentication or nonce.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-32475
参考链接:
N-able N-central < 2026.3.1.10 - Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-18577 - CVE:
CVE-2026-18577(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.06153 (percentile 0.92936) @ 2026-08-26
描述: N-able N-central versions through 2026.3.1 contain an authentication bypass that lets a remote unauthenticated attacker take over an administrator account and gain full control of the N-central server. CVE-2026-18577 is a bypass of the incomplete fix for CVE-2026-18556, so the 2026.3.1 Hotfix 1 build (2026.3.1.7) does not fully remediate it. Hotfix 2 (2026.3.1.10) supersedes Hotfix 1 and is the first fully fixed 2026.3 build.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-18577
参考链接:
Starlette - Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in Input
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-48710 - CVE:
CVE-2026-48710(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01905 (percentile 0.78195) @ 2026-08-26
描述: A flaw was found in Starlette, a lightweight ASGI (Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface) framework. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted HTTP Host request header. This malformed header could cause the request.url to be incorrectly reconstructed, leading to a discrepancy with the actual requested path. Consequently, security restrictions enforced by middleware and endpoints that rely on request.url for validation could be bypassed, potentially allowing unauthorized access or actions.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-48710
参考链接:
SPIP < 4.4.22 - Unauthenticated RCE
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-77806 - CVE:
CVE-2026-77806(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01264 (percentile 0.67535) @ 2026-08-26
描述: SPIP < 4.4.21 contains a remote code execution caused by mishandling of the X-Spip-Filtre HTTP request header in analyse_resultat_skel, letting unauthenticated remote attackers execute arbitrary code.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-77806
参考链接:
N-able N-central < 2026.3.1.10 - Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-18577 - CVE:
CVE-2026-18577(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.06153 (percentile 0.92936) @ 2026-08-26
描述: N-able N-central versions through 2026.3.1 contain an authentication bypass that lets a remote unauthenticated attacker take over an administrator account and gain full control of the N-central server. CVE-2026-18577 is a bypass of the incomplete fix for CVE-2026-18556, so the 2026.3.1 Hotfix 1 build (2026.3.1.7) does not fully remediate it. Hotfix 2 (2026.3.1.10) supersedes Hotfix 1 and is the first fully fixed 2026.3 build.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-18577
参考链接:
Starlette - Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in Input
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-48710 - CVE:
CVE-2026-48710(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01905 (percentile 0.78195) @ 2026-08-26
描述: A flaw was found in Starlette, a lightweight ASGI (Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface) framework. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted HTTP Host request header. This malformed header could cause the request.url to be incorrectly reconstructed, leading to a discrepancy with the actual requested path. Consequently, security restrictions enforced by middleware and endpoints that rely on request.url for validation could be bypassed, potentially allowing unauthorized access or actions.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-48710
参考链接:
SPIP < 4.4.22 - Unauthenticated RCE
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-77806 - CVE:
CVE-2026-77806(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01264 (percentile 0.67535) @ 2026-08-26
描述: SPIP < 4.4.21 contains a remote code execution caused by mishandling of the X-Spip-Filtre HTTP request header in analyse_resultat_skel, letting unauthenticated remote attackers execute arbitrary code.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-77806
参考链接:
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-1550 - CVE:
CVE-2025-1550(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.02581 (percentile 0.84069) @ 2026-08-26
描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-25291 - CVE:
CVE-2025-25291(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.2026 (percentile 0.97277) @ 2026-08-26
描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291
参考链接:
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-32463 - CVE:
CVE-2025-32463(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.58759 (percentile 0.99035) @ 2026-08-26
描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463
参考链接:
CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-54309 - CVE:
CVE-2025-54309(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.94709 (percentile 0.9985) @ 2026-08-26
描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309
参考链接:
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6216 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6216(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.35127 (percentile 0.98319) @ 2026-08-26
描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216
参考链接:
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-20182 - CVE:
CVE-2026-20182(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.91522 (percentile 0.99804) @ 2026-08-26
描述: Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller and Manager contain an authentication bypass caused by improper peering authentication mechanism, letting unauthenticated remote attackers obtain administrative privileges, exploit requires sending crafted requests.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-20182
参考链接:
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-1550 - CVE:
CVE-2025-1550(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.02581 (percentile 0.84069) @ 2026-08-26
描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-25291 - CVE:
CVE-2025-25291(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.2026 (percentile 0.97277) @ 2026-08-26
描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291
参考链接:
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-32463 - CVE:
CVE-2025-32463(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.58759 (percentile 0.99035) @ 2026-08-26
描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463
参考链接:
CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-54309 - CVE:
CVE-2025-54309(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.94709 (percentile 0.9985) @ 2026-08-26
描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309
参考链接:
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6216 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6216(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.35127 (percentile 0.98319) @ 2026-08-26
描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216
参考链接:
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-68926 - CVE:
CVE-2025-68926(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.29593 (percentile 0.9805) @ 2026-08-26
描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926
参考链接:
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-20182 - CVE:
CVE-2026-20182(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.91522 (percentile 0.99804) @ 2026-08-26
描述: Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller and Manager contain an authentication bypass caused by improper peering authentication mechanism, letting unauthenticated remote attackers obtain administrative privileges, exploit requires sending crafted requests.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-20182
参考链接:
Zimbra Collaboration Suite < 10.1.20 - OS Command Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-73570 - CVE:
CVE-2026-73570(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01506 (percentile 0.72468) @ 2026-08-26
描述: Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) before version 10.1.20 is vulnerable to OS command injection in the SNMP notification processing due to improper input sanitization. According to the NVD, when SNMP notifications are enabled and the zimbra-snmp package is installed, an unauthenticated attacker can inject arbitrary commands using crafted SMTP requests that result in malicious log entries. The swatchdog service monitors the log, and upon matching a pattern, passes the log content to zmsnmptrapd, which unsafely uses the Perl backtick operator to execute commands. This can ultimately allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands as the zimbra user. Active exploitation of this vulnerability has been observed in the wild, as confirmed by CERT Polska and CISA.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-73570
参考链接:
Zimbra Collaboration Suite < 10.1.20 - OS Command Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-73570 - CVE:
CVE-2026-73570(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01506 (percentile 0.72468) @ 2026-08-26
描述: Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) before version 10.1.20 is vulnerable to OS command injection in the SNMP notification processing due to improper input sanitization. According to the NVD, when SNMP notifications are enabled and the zimbra-snmp package is installed, an unauthenticated attacker can inject arbitrary commands using crafted SMTP requests that result in malicious log entries. The swatchdog service monitors the log, and upon matching a pattern, passes the log content to zmsnmptrapd, which unsafely uses the Perl backtick operator to execute commands. This can ultimately allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands as the zimbra user. Active exploitation of this vulnerability has been observed in the wild, as confirmed by CERT Polska and CISA.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-73570
参考链接:
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6984 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6984(2025) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01661 (percentile 0.74903) @ 2026-08-26
描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984
参考链接:
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-10795 - CVE:
CVE-2026-10795(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88525) @ 2026-08-26
描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795
参考链接:
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6984 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6984(2025) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01661 (percentile 0.74903) @ 2026-08-26
描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984
参考链接:
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-10795 - CVE:
CVE-2026-10795(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88525) @ 2026-08-26
描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795
参考链接:
📋 完整模板列表
| 模板名称 | 严重程度 | 类别 | 影响资产 | EPSS | 风险评分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elementor Pro <=4.2.1 - Unauthenticated Ar | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0065 | 5/5 |
| Elementor Pro <=4.2.1 - Unauthenticated Ar | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0065 | 5/5 |
| N-able N-central < 2026.3.1.10 - Authentication | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0615 | 5/5 |
| Starlette - Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivale | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0191 | 5/5 |
| SPIP < 4.4.22 - Unauthenticated RCE | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0126 | 5/5 |
| N-able N-central < 2026.3.1.10 - Authentication | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0615 | 5/5 |
| Starlette - Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivale | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0191 | 5/5 |
| SPIP < 4.4.22 - Unauthenticated RCE | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0126 | 5/5 |
| Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0258 | 5/5 |
| GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 0.2026 | 5/5 |
| Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.5876 | 5/5 |
| CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.9471 | 5/5 |
| Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.3513 | 5/5 |
| Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentica | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.9152 | 5/5 |
| Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0258 | 5/5 |
| GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 0.2026 | 5/5 |
| Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.5876 | 5/5 |
| CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.9471 | 5/5 |
| Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.3513 | 5/5 |
| RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.2959 | 5/5 |
| Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentica | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.9152 | 5/5 |
| Zimbra Collaboration Suite < 10.1.20 - OS Comma | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0151 | 4.5/5 |
| Zimbra Collaboration Suite < 10.1.20 - OS Comma | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0151 | 4.5/5 |
| langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0166 | 4.5/5 |
| UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0358 | 4.5/5 |
| langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0166 | 4.5/5 |
| UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0358 | 4.5/5 |
| Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0120 | 3.5/5 |
| Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0169 | 3.5/5 |
| Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0168 | 3.5/5 |
🛡️ 安全建议
🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理
🔧 扫描建议
建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：
# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-32475.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-32475.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-18577.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-48710.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-77806.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-18577.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-48710.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-77806.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t network/cves/2026/CVE-2026-73570.yaml -t network/cves/2026/CVE-2026-73570.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -u target-url
# 扫描所有今日新增模板
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-32475.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-32475.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-18577.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-48710.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-77806.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-18577.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-48710.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-77806.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t network/cves/2026/CVE-2026-73570.yaml -t network/cves/2026/CVE-2026-73570.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -u target-url
本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates
扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试