Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-22

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描威胁情报

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-22

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 615 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 585 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 23 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 18 个
  • 🟠 高危: 5 个
  • 🟡 中危: 7 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

Everest Forms WordPress Plugin <= 3.4.3 - PHP Object Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-3296
  • CVE: CVE-2026-3296 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00878 (percentile 0.55097) @ 2026-07-21

描述: The Everest Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.3 via deserialization of untrusted input from form entry metadata. This is due to the html-admin-page-entries-view.php file calling PHP's native unserialize() on stored entry meta values without passing the allowed_classes parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a serialized PHP object payload through any public Everest Forms form field. The payload survives sanitize_text_field() sanitization (serialization control characters are not stripped) and is stored in the wp_evf_entrymeta database table. When an administrator views entries or views an individual entry, the unsafe unserialize() call processes the stored data without class restrictions.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-3296

参考链接:

SonicWall SMA1000 - Server-Side Request Forgery

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-15409
  • CVE: CVE-2026-15409 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01266 (percentile 0.66544) @ 2026-07-21

描述: SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface contains a server side request forgery caused by improper request validation, letting remote unauthenticated attackers make requests to unintended locations, exploit requires no special privileges.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-15409

参考链接:

Langflow < 1.3.0 - Remote Code Execution via validate_code() exec()

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-0770
  • CVE: CVE-2026-0770 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.10371 (percentile 0.95225) @ 2026-07-21

描述: Langflow contains a remote code execution caused by inclusion of functionality from untrusted control sphere in the exec_globals parameter at the validate endpoint, letting remote attackers execute arbitrary code as root, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-0770

参考链接:

Everest Forms WordPress Plugin <= 3.4.3 - PHP Object Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-3296
  • CVE: CVE-2026-3296 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00878 (percentile 0.55097) @ 2026-07-21

描述: The Everest Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.3 via deserialization of untrusted input from form entry metadata. This is due to the html-admin-page-entries-view.php file calling PHP's native unserialize() on stored entry meta values without passing the allowed_classes parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a serialized PHP object payload through any public Everest Forms form field. The payload survives sanitize_text_field() sanitization (serialization control characters are not stripped) and is stored in the wp_evf_entrymeta database table. When an administrator views entries or views an individual entry, the unsafe unserialize() call processes the stored data without class restrictions.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-3296

参考链接:

Page Builder CK <= 3.5.10 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-56290
  • CVE: CVE-2026-56290 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: Joomla 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02912 (percentile 0.85485) @ 2026-07-21

描述: Joomla Page Builder CK contains an unrestricted file upload vulnerability caused by lack of proper validation, letting unauthenticated attackers upload executable files and achieve remote code execution.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-56290

参考链接:

WordPress Core 6.9-7.0.1 - Pre-Auth Blind SQL Injection (Batch-Route Confusion)

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-63030
  • CVE: CVE-2026-63030 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.08946 (percentile 0.94679) @ 2026-07-21

描述: WordPress core versions 6.9.0 through 6.9.4 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.1 are vulnerable to a pre-authentication timing-based blind SQL injection via the REST API batch endpoint. A route confusion vulnerability (CVE-2026-63030) allows nested batch requests to bypass authentication checks, while a SQL injection flaw (CVE-2026-60137) in the author_exclude parameter of /wp/v2/categories allows arbitrary SQL queries via a SLEEP-based timing oracle. An unauthenticated attacker can extract the full database contents including user credentials.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-63030,CVE-2026-60137

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02803 (percentile 0.84927) @ 2026-07-21

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.19506 (percentile 0.97079) @ 2026-07-21

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32433
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32433 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.98594 (percentile 0.99919) @ 2026-07-21

描述: Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11, and OTP-25.3.2.20, a SSH server may allow an attacker to perform unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in SSH protocol message handling, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems and execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32433

参考链接:

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6216 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.3072 (percentile 0.98048) @ 2026-07-21

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.2903 (percentile 0.97956) @ 2026-07-21

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-9242
  • CVE: CVE-2025-9242 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.8637 (percentile 0.99716) @ 2026-07-21

描述: WatchGuard Fireware OS 11.10.2 to 11.12.4_Update1, 12.0 to 12.11.3, and 2025.1 contains an out-of-bounds write caused by improper handling in Mobile User VPN and Branch Office VPN with IKEv2 dynamic gateway peer, letting remote unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-9242

参考链接:

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-20182
  • CVE: CVE-2026-20182 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.88496 (percentile 0.99757) @ 2026-07-21

描述: Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller and Manager contain an authentication bypass caused by improper peering authentication mechanism, letting unauthenticated remote attackers obtain administrative privileges, exploit requires sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-20182

参考链接:

Everest Forms WordPress Plugin <= 3.4.3 - PHP Object Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-3296
  • CVE: CVE-2026-3296 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00878 (percentile 0.55097) @ 2026-07-21

描述: The Everest Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.3 via deserialization of untrusted input from form entry metadata. This is due to the html-admin-page-entries-view.php file calling PHP's native unserialize() on stored entry meta values without passing the allowed_classes parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a serialized PHP object payload through any public Everest Forms form field. The payload survives sanitize_text_field() sanitization (serialization control characters are not stripped) and is stored in the wp_evf_entrymeta database table. When an administrator views entries or views an individual entry, the unsafe unserialize() call processes the stored data without class restrictions.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-3296

参考链接:

Everest Forms WordPress Plugin <= 3.4.3 - PHP Object Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-3296
  • CVE: CVE-2026-3296 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00878 (percentile 0.55097) @ 2026-07-21

描述: The Everest Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.3 via deserialization of untrusted input from form entry metadata. This is due to the html-admin-page-entries-view.php file calling PHP's native unserialize() on stored entry meta values without passing the allowed_classes parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a serialized PHP object payload through any public Everest Forms form field. The payload survives sanitize_text_field() sanitization (serialization control characters are not stripped) and is stored in the wp_evf_entrymeta database table. When an administrator views entries or views an individual entry, the unsafe unserialize() call processes the stored data without class restrictions.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-3296

参考链接:

SonicWall SMA1000 - Server-Side Request Forgery

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-15409
  • CVE: CVE-2026-15409 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01266 (percentile 0.66544) @ 2026-07-21

描述: SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface contains a server side request forgery caused by improper request validation, letting remote unauthenticated attackers make requests to unintended locations, exploit requires no special privileges.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-15409

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02803 (percentile 0.84927) @ 2026-07-21

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.19506 (percentile 0.97079) @ 2026-07-21

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Langflow < 1.7.0 - Path Traversal

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-33497
  • CVE: CVE-2026-33497 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.08847 (percentile 0.94633) @ 2026-07-21

描述: Langflow < 1.7.1 contains a path traversal caused by insufficient filtering of folder_name and file_name parameters in download_profile_picture endpoint, letting attackers read secret_key across directories, exploit requires crafted request.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-33497

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01531 (percentile 0.71996) @ 2026-07-21

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

Langflow < 1.7.0 - Path Traversal

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-33497
  • CVE: CVE-2026-33497 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.08847 (percentile 0.94633) @ 2026-07-21

描述: Langflow < 1.7.1 contains a path traversal caused by insufficient filtering of folder_name and file_name parameters in download_profile_picture endpoint, letting attackers read secret_key across directories, exploit requires crafted request.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-33497

参考链接:

Langflow < 1.7.0 - Path Traversal

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-33497
  • CVE: CVE-2026-33497 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.08847 (percentile 0.94633) @ 2026-07-21

描述: Langflow < 1.7.1 contains a path traversal caused by insufficient filtering of folder_name and file_name parameters in download_profile_picture endpoint, letting attackers read secret_key across directories, exploit requires crafted request.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-33497

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产EPSS风险评分
Everest Forms WordPress Plugin <= 3.4.3 -🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00885/5
SonicWall SMA1000 - Server-Side Request Forgery🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.01275/5
Langflow < 1.3.0 - Remote Code Execution via va🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.10375/5
Everest Forms WordPress Plugin <= 3.4.3 -🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00885/5
Page Builder CK <= 3.5.10 - Unauthenticate🔴 criticalCVE漏洞Joomla 站点0.02915/5
WordPress Core 6.9-7.0.1 - Pre-Auth Blind SQL Inje🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.08955/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02805/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.19515/5
Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.98595/5
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.30725/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.29035/5
WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.86375/5
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentica🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.88505/5
Everest Forms WordPress Plugin <= 3.4.3 -🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00885/5
Everest Forms WordPress Plugin <= 3.4.3 -🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00885/5
SonicWall SMA1000 - Server-Side Request Forgery🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.01275/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02805/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.19515/5
Langflow < 1.7.0 - Path Traversal🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.08854.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01534.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点-4.5/5
Langflow < 1.7.0 - Path Traversal🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.08854.5/5
Langflow < 1.7.0 - Path Traversal🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.08854.5/5
YesWiki Archived Revision - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用-3.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01203.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01663.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用-3.5/5
YesWiki Archived Revision - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用-3.5/5
Mailpit < 1.28.2 - SMTP CRLF Injection🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用-3.5/5
Mailpit < 1.28.2 - SMTP CRLF Injection🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用-3.5/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-3296.yaml -t javascript/cves/2026/CVE-2026-15409.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-0770.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-3296.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-56290.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-63030.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-3296.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-3296.yaml -t javascript/cves/2026/CVE-2026-15409.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33497.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33497.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33497.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-3296.yaml -t javascript/cves/2026/CVE-2026-15409.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-0770.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-3296.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-56290.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-63030.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-3296.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-3296.yaml -t javascript/cves/2026/CVE-2026-15409.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33497.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33497.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33497.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-52773.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-52773.yaml -t network/cves/2026/CVE-2026-23829.yaml -t network/cves/2026/CVE-2026-23829.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-21
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-21

4 个共同标签

从 626 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 24 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-20

4 个共同标签

从 300 个模板更新中精选分析 7 个高价值 POC，发现 4 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-19

4 个共同标签

从 603 个模板更新中精选分析 20 个高价值 POC，发现 14 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-18

4 个共同标签

从 607 个模板更新中精选分析 25 个高价值 POC，发现 19 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-17

4 个共同标签

从 607 个模板更新中精选分析 25 个高价值 POC，发现 15 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章