Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-21
📊 智能筛选概况
- 发现变更: 626 个模板更新
- 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
- 智能跳过: 596 个低优先级模板
- 高风险漏洞: 24 个
- 主要类别: CVE漏洞(29), 其他(1)
💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。
严重程度分布
- 🔴 严重: 17 个
- 🟠 高危: 7 个
- 🟡 中危: 6 个
🔍 重点漏洞分析
Flowise < 3.1.2 - node-custom-function Unauthorized RCE
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-46442 - CVE:
CVE-2026-46442(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.0082 (percentile 0.53214) @ 2026-07-20
描述: Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to version 3.1.2, POST /api/v1/node-custom-function lacks route-level authorization, allowing any authenticated user or API key to submit arbitrary JavaScript to the Custom JS Function node. When E2B_APIKEY is not configured — the common deployment case — Flowise executes this code inside a NodeVM sandbox. This sandbox can be escaped, allowing an attacker to reach the host process object and execute system commands via child_process. The result is authenticated remote code execution on the Flowise server host. This issue has been patched in version 3.1.2.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-46442
参考链接:
YMC Filter - SQL Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-54836 - CVE:
CVE-2026-54836(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00229 (percentile 0.13827) @ 2026-07-20
描述: YMC Filter <= 3.11.5 contains an sql injection caused by improper neutralization of special elements in SQL commands, letting attackers execute arbitrary SQL queries, exploit requires crafted input.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-54836
参考链接:
WP Maps Pro (wp-google-map-gold) <= 6.1.0 - Unauthenticated Administrator Account Creation
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-8732 - CVE:
CVE-2026-8732(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.09461 (percentile 0.94891) @ 2026-07-20
描述: The WP Maps Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation via Administrator Account Creation in all versions up to, and including, 6.1.0. This is due to the wpgmp_temp_access_ajax AJAX action being registered with wp_ajax_nopriv_ and protected only by a nonce check using the fc-call-nonce nonce, which is publicly embedded into every frontend page via wp_localize_script as the nonce field of the wpgmp_local JavaScript object, rendering the check ineffective as an access control mechanism. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke the wpgmp_temp_access_support handler with check_temp=false, which unconditionally creates a new WordPress user with the hardcoded role of administrator via wp_insert_user() and returns a magic login URL that, when visited, calls wp_set_auth_cookie() to fully authenticate the attacker as the newly created administrator, resulting in complete site takeover.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-8732
参考链接:
WP Maps Pro (wp-google-map-gold) <= 6.1.0 - Unauthenticated Administrator Account Creation
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-8732 - CVE:
CVE-2026-8732(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.09461 (percentile 0.94891) @ 2026-07-20
描述: The WP Maps Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation via Administrator Account Creation in all versions up to, and including, 6.1.0. This is due to the wpgmp_temp_access_ajax AJAX action being registered with wp_ajax_nopriv_ and protected only by a nonce check using the fc-call-nonce nonce, which is publicly embedded into every frontend page via wp_localize_script as the nonce field of the wpgmp_local JavaScript object, rendering the check ineffective as an access control mechanism. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke the wpgmp_temp_access_support handler with check_temp=false, which unconditionally creates a new WordPress user with the hardcoded role of administrator via wp_insert_user() and returns a magic login URL that, when visited, calls wp_set_auth_cookie() to fully authenticate the attacker as the newly created administrator, resulting in complete site takeover.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-8732
参考链接:
Flowise < 3.1.2 - node-custom-function Unauthorized RCE
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-46442 - CVE:
CVE-2026-46442(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.0082 (percentile 0.53214) @ 2026-07-20
描述: Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to version 3.1.2, POST /api/v1/node-custom-function lacks route-level authorization, allowing any authenticated user or API key to submit arbitrary JavaScript to the Custom JS Function node. When E2B_APIKEY is not configured — the common deployment case — Flowise executes this code inside a NodeVM sandbox. This sandbox can be escaped, allowing an attacker to reach the host process object and execute system commands via child_process. The result is authenticated remote code execution on the Flowise server host. This issue has been patched in version 3.1.2.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-46442
参考链接:
Flowise < 3.1.2 - node-custom-function Unauthorized RCE
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-46442 - CVE:
CVE-2026-46442(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.0082 (percentile 0.53214) @ 2026-07-20
描述: Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to version 3.1.2, POST /api/v1/node-custom-function lacks route-level authorization, allowing any authenticated user or API key to submit arbitrary JavaScript to the Custom JS Function node. When E2B_APIKEY is not configured — the common deployment case — Flowise executes this code inside a NodeVM sandbox. This sandbox can be escaped, allowing an attacker to reach the host process object and execute system commands via child_process. The result is authenticated remote code execution on the Flowise server host. This issue has been patched in version 3.1.2.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-46442
参考链接:
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-1550 - CVE:
CVE-2025-1550(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.02803 (percentile 0.84915) @ 2026-07-20
描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-25291 - CVE:
CVE-2025-25291(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.19506 (percentile 0.97075) @ 2026-07-20
描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291
参考链接:
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-32463 - CVE:
CVE-2025-32463(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.48239 (percentile 0.98734) @ 2026-07-20
描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463
参考链接:
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6216 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6216(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.3072 (percentile 0.98046) @ 2026-07-20
描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216
参考链接:
Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalation via AF_ALG
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-31431 - CVE:
CVE-2026-31431(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.96267 (percentile 0.99872) @ 2026-07-20
描述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-31431
参考链接:
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-1550 - CVE:
CVE-2025-1550(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.02803 (percentile 0.84915) @ 2026-07-20
描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-25291 - CVE:
CVE-2025-25291(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.19506 (percentile 0.97075) @ 2026-07-20
描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291
参考链接:
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-32463 - CVE:
CVE-2025-32463(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.48239 (percentile 0.98734) @ 2026-07-20
描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463
参考链接:
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6216 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6216(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.3072 (percentile 0.98046) @ 2026-07-20
描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216
参考链接:
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-68926 - CVE:
CVE-2025-68926(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.2903 (percentile 0.97954) @ 2026-07-20
描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926
参考链接:
Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalation via AF_ALG
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-31431 - CVE:
CVE-2026-31431(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.96267 (percentile 0.99872) @ 2026-07-20
描述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-31431
参考链接:
WP Maps Pro (wp-google-map-gold) <= 6.1.0 - Unauthenticated Administrator Account Creation
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-8732 - CVE:
CVE-2026-8732(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.09461 (percentile 0.94891) @ 2026-07-20
描述: The WP Maps Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation via Administrator Account Creation in all versions up to, and including, 6.1.0. This is due to the wpgmp_temp_access_ajax AJAX action being registered with wp_ajax_nopriv_ and protected only by a nonce check using the fc-call-nonce nonce, which is publicly embedded into every frontend page via wp_localize_script as the nonce field of the wpgmp_local JavaScript object, rendering the check ineffective as an access control mechanism. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke the wpgmp_temp_access_support handler with check_temp=false, which unconditionally creates a new WordPress user with the hardcoded role of administrator via wp_insert_user() and returns a magic login URL that, when visited, calls wp_set_auth_cookie() to fully authenticate the attacker as the newly created administrator, resulting in complete site takeover.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-8732
参考链接:
Web-Check < 2.0.1 Screenshot API - OS Command Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-32778 - CVE:
CVE-2025-32778(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.19326 (percentile 0.97043) @ 2026-07-20
描述: Lissy93/web-check contains a command injection caused by unsanitized user input in the screenshot API, letting attackers execute arbitrary system commands, exploit requires sending crafted url parameters.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-32778
参考链接:
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6984 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6984(2025) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01531 (percentile 0.71977) @ 2026-07-20
描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984
参考链接:
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-10795 - CVE:
CVE-2026-10795(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88121) @ 2026-07-20
描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795
参考链接:
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6984 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6984(2025) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01531 (percentile 0.71977) @ 2026-07-20
描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984
参考链接:
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-10795 - CVE:
CVE-2026-10795(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88121) @ 2026-07-20
描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795
参考链接:
Jenkins Dashboard - Unauthenticated Access
- 漏洞ID:
unauthenticated-jenkins - CVE: -
- 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
- 影响资产: Jenkins CI/CD
- 预估影响: 数十万个
描述: Jenkins Dashboard is exposed to external users.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
📋 完整模板列表
| 模板名称 | 严重程度 | 类别 | 影响资产 | EPSS | 风险评分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flowise < 3.1.2 - node-custom-function Unauthor | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0082 | 5/5 |
| YMC Filter - SQL Injection | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0023 | 5/5 |
| WP Maps Pro (wp-google-map-gold) <= 6.1.0 | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0946 | 5/5 |
| WP Maps Pro (wp-google-map-gold) <= 6.1.0 | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0946 | 5/5 |
| Flowise < 3.1.2 - node-custom-function Unauthor | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0082 | 5/5 |
| Flowise < 3.1.2 - node-custom-function Unauthor | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0082 | 5/5 |
| Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0280 | 5/5 |
| GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 0.1951 | 5/5 |
| Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.4824 | 5/5 |
| Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.3072 | 5/5 |
| Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalatio | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.9627 | 5/5 |
| Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0280 | 5/5 |
| GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 0.1951 | 5/5 |
| Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.4824 | 5/5 |
| Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.3072 | 5/5 |
| RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.2903 | 5/5 |
| Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalatio | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.9627 | 5/5 |
| WP Maps Pro (wp-google-map-gold) <= 6.1.0 | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0946 | 5/5 |
| Web-Check < 2.0.1 Screenshot API - OS Command I | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.1933 | 5/5 |
| langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0153 | 4.5/5 |
| UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0358 | 4.5/5 |
| langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0153 | 4.5/5 |
| UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0358 | 4.5/5 |
| Jenkins Dashboard - Unauthenticated Access | 🟠 high | 其他 | Jenkins CI/CD | - | 4/5 |
| Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0120 | 3.5/5 |
| Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0166 | 3.5/5 |
| Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0165 | 3.5/5 |
| Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0120 | 3.5/5 |
| Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0166 | 3.5/5 |
| Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0165 | 3.5/5 |
🛡️ 安全建议
🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理
🔧 扫描建议
建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：
# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-46442.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-54836.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8732.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8732.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-46442.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-46442.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8732.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32778.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/jenkins/unauthenticated-jenkins.yaml -u target-url
# 扫描所有今日新增模板
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-46442.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-54836.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8732.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8732.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-46442.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-46442.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8732.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32778.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/jenkins/unauthenticated-jenkins.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -u target-url
本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates
扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试