Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-06-12

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描威胁情报

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-06-12

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 403 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 373 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 23 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 17 个
  • 🟠 高危: 6 个
  • 🟡 中危: 7 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

Hippoo Mobile App for WooCommerce <= 1.9.4 - Authentication Bypass to Admin Account Takeover

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10580
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10580 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00319 (percentile 0.55395) @ 2026-06-11

描述: Hippoo Mobile App for WooCommerce WordPress plugin <= 1.9.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by logic conflation in user permission checks, letting unauthenticated attackers take over administrator accounts via REST API password reset.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10580

参考链接:

phpMyFAQ <= 4.1.1 - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-46364
  • CVE: CVE-2026-46364 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00065 (percentile 0.2036) @ 2026-06-11

描述: phpMyFAQ before 4.1.2 contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in BuiltinCaptcha::garbageCollector() and BuiltinCaptcha::saveCaptcha() methods that interpolate unsanitized User-Agent headers into DELETE and INSERT queries. Unauthenticated attackers can exploit the public GET /api/captcha endpoint by crafting malicious User-Agent headers to perform time-based blind SQL injection, extracting sensitive data including user credentials, admin tokens, and SMTP credentials from the database.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Dgraph <= 25.3.2 - Admin Token Disclosure

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-41492
  • CVE: CVE-2026-41492 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00228 (percentile 0.45729) @ 2026-06-11

描述: Dgraph <= 25.3.2 contains an information disclosure caused by unauthenticated access to the /debug/vars endpoint , which publishes the cmdline variable including the --security token= flag, letting unauthenticated remote attackers retrieve the admin token and access admin-only endpoints, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-41492

参考链接:

Ivanti Sentry - OS Command Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10520
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10520 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.03275 (percentile 0.8746) @ 2026-06-11

描述: An OS Command Injection vulnerability in Ivanti Sentry before the R10.5.2, R10.6.2 and R10.7.1 versions allows a remote unauthenticated user to achieve root-level remote code execution

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Everest Forms Pro <= 1.9.12 - Unauthenticated RCE via Calculation Formula Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-3300
  • CVE: CVE-2026-3300 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00327 (percentile 0.5601) @ 2026-06-11

描述: The Everest Forms Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via PHP Code Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.12. This is due to the Calculation Addon's process_filter() function concatenating user-submitted form field values into a PHP code string without proper escaping before passing it to eval(). The sanitize_text_field() function applied to input does not escape single quotes or other PHP code context characters. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code on the server by submitting a crafted value in any string-type form field (text, email, URL, select, radio) when a form uses the "Complex Calculation" feature.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-3300

参考链接:

WordPress Product Slider Pro for WooCommerce < 3.5.4 - Supply Chain Backdoor RCE

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-49777
  • CVE: CVE-2026-49777 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00075 (percentile 0.22593) @ 2026-06-11

描述: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in ShapedPlugin, LLC Product Slider Pro for WooCommerce allows Malicious Software Implanted. This issue affects Product Slider Pro for WooCommerce: from n/a before 3.5.4.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-49777

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.09875 (percentile 0.93166) @ 2026-06-11

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.20843 (percentile 0.95748) @ 2026-06-11

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32433
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32433 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.62606 (percentile 0.98401) @ 2026-06-11

描述: Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11, and OTP-25.3.2.20, a SSH server may allow an attacker to perform unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in SSH protocol message handling, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems and execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32433

参考链接:

Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32463
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32463 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.57345 (percentile 0.98194) @ 2026-06-11

描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463

参考链接:

CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-54309
  • CVE: CVE-2025-54309 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.768 (percentile 0.98975) @ 2026-06-11

描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309

参考链接:

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6216 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.49839 (percentile 0.97872) @ 2026-06-11

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.0771 (percentile 0.92111) @ 2026-06-11

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

Hippoo Mobile App for WooCommerce <= 1.9.4 - Authentication Bypass to Admin Account Takeover

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10580
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10580 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00319 (percentile 0.55395) @ 2026-06-11

描述: Hippoo Mobile App for WooCommerce WordPress plugin <= 1.9.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by logic conflation in user permission checks, letting unauthenticated attackers take over administrator accounts via REST API password reset.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10580

参考链接:

phpMyFAQ <= 4.1.1 - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-46364
  • CVE: CVE-2026-46364 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00065 (percentile 0.2036) @ 2026-06-11

描述: phpMyFAQ before 4.1.2 contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in BuiltinCaptcha::garbageCollector() and BuiltinCaptcha::saveCaptcha() methods that interpolate unsanitized User-Agent headers into DELETE and INSERT queries. Unauthenticated attackers can exploit the public GET /api/captcha endpoint by crafting malicious User-Agent headers to perform time-based blind SQL injection, extracting sensitive data including user credentials, admin tokens, and SMTP credentials from the database.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

phpMyFAQ <= 4.1.1 - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-46364
  • CVE: CVE-2026-46364 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00065 (percentile 0.2036) @ 2026-06-11

描述: phpMyFAQ before 4.1.2 contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in BuiltinCaptcha::garbageCollector() and BuiltinCaptcha::saveCaptcha() methods that interpolate unsanitized User-Agent headers into DELETE and INSERT queries. Unauthenticated attackers can exploit the public GET /api/captcha endpoint by crafting malicious User-Agent headers to perform time-based blind SQL injection, extracting sensitive data including user credentials, admin tokens, and SMTP credentials from the database.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Dgraph <= 25.3.2 - Admin Token Disclosure

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-41492
  • CVE: CVE-2026-41492 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00228 (percentile 0.45729) @ 2026-06-11

描述: Dgraph <= 25.3.2 contains an information disclosure caused by unauthenticated access to the /debug/vars endpoint , which publishes the cmdline variable including the --security token= flag, letting unauthenticated remote attackers retrieve the admin token and access admin-only endpoints, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-41492

参考链接:

SiYuan <= v3.6.1 - Path Traversal

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-33476
  • CVE: CVE-2026-33476 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00352 (percentile 0.57977) @ 2026-06-11

描述: SiYuan is a personal knowledge management system. Prior to version 3.6.2, the Siyuan kernel exposes an unauthenticated file-serving endpoint under /appearance/*filepath. Due to improper path sanitization, attackers can perform directory traversal and read arbitrary files accessible to the server process. Authentication checks explicitly exclude this endpoint, allowing exploitation without valid credentials. Version 3.6.2 fixes this issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-33476

参考链接:

PraisonAI - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-44338
  • CVE: CVE-2026-44338 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00031 (percentile 0.09612) @ 2026-06-11

描述: PraisonAI 2.5.6 to < 4.6.34 contains a broken authentication caused by disabled default authentication in legacy Flask API server, letting remote attackers access /agents and trigger workflows without token, exploit requires network access to API server.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-44338

参考链接:

PraisonAI - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-44338
  • CVE: CVE-2026-44338 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00031 (percentile 0.09612) @ 2026-06-11

描述: PraisonAI 2.5.6 to < 4.6.34 contains a broken authentication caused by disabled default authentication in legacy Flask API server, letting remote attackers access /agents and trigger workflows without token, exploit requires network access to API server.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-44338

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01922 (percentile 0.83748) @ 2026-06-11

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

SiYuan <= v3.6.1 - Path Traversal

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-33476
  • CVE: CVE-2026-33476 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00352 (percentile 0.57977) @ 2026-06-11

描述: SiYuan is a personal knowledge management system. Prior to version 3.6.2, the Siyuan kernel exposes an unauthenticated file-serving endpoint under /appearance/*filepath. Due to improper path sanitization, attackers can perform directory traversal and read arbitrary files accessible to the server process. Authentication checks explicitly exclude this endpoint, allowing exploitation without valid credentials. Version 3.6.2 fixes this issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-33476

参考链接:

SiYuan <= v3.6.1 - Path Traversal

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-33476
  • CVE: CVE-2026-33476 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00352 (percentile 0.57977) @ 2026-06-11

描述: SiYuan is a personal knowledge management system. Prior to version 3.6.2, the Siyuan kernel exposes an unauthenticated file-serving endpoint under /appearance/*filepath. Due to improper path sanitization, attackers can perform directory traversal and read arbitrary files accessible to the server process. Authentication checks explicitly exclude this endpoint, allowing exploitation without valid credentials. Version 3.6.2 fixes this issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-33476

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产EPSS风险评分
Hippoo Mobile App for WooCommerce <= 1.9.4🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00325/5
phpMyFAQ <= 4.1.1 - SQL Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00065/5
Dgraph <= 25.3.2 - Admin Token Disclosure🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00235/5
Ivanti Sentry - OS Command Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.03285/5
Everest Forms Pro <= 1.9.12 - Unauthentica🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00335/5
WordPress Product Slider Pro for WooCommerce <🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00085/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.09885/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.20845/5
Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.62615/5
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.57355/5
CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.76805/5
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.49845/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.07715/5
Hippoo Mobile App for WooCommerce <= 1.9.4🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00325/5
phpMyFAQ <= 4.1.1 - SQL Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00065/5
phpMyFAQ <= 4.1.1 - SQL Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00065/5
Dgraph <= 25.3.2 - Admin Token Disclosure🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00235/5
SiYuan <= v3.6.1 - Path Traversal🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00354.5/5
PraisonAI - Authentication Bypass🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00034.5/5
PraisonAI - Authentication Bypass🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00034.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01924.5/5
SiYuan <= v3.6.1 - Path Traversal🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00354.5/5
SiYuan <= v3.6.1 - Path Traversal🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00354.5/5
Label Studio < 1.16.0 - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.20053.7/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.36863.7/5
Label Studio < 1.16.0 - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.20053.7/5
Label Studio < 1.16.0 - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.20053.7/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.03973.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.00683.5/5
PraisonAI AgentOS - Information Disclosure🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.00063.5/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10580.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-46364.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-41492.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10520.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-3300.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-49777.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10580.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-46364.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-46364.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-41492.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33476.yaml -t http/cves/2026/cve-2026-44338.yaml -t http/cves/2026/cve-2026-44338.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33476.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33476.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10580.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-46364.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-41492.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10520.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-3300.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-49777.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10580.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-46364.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-46364.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-41492.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33476.yaml -t http/cves/2026/cve-2026-44338.yaml -t http/cves/2026/cve-2026-44338.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33476.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-33476.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25296.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25296.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25296.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-40151.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-06-11
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-06-11

4 个共同标签

从 657 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 26 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-06-10

4 个共同标签

从 398 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 25 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-06-09

4 个共同标签

从 420 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 13 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-06-08

4 个共同标签

从 862 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 21 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-06-07

4 个共同标签

从 300 个模板更新中精选分析 14 个高价值 POC，发现 11 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章