Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-11-22

📊 智能筛选概况

• 发现变更: 334 个模板更新
• 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
• 智能跳过: 304 个低优先级模板
• 高风险漏洞: 19 个
• 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

• 🔴 严重: 12 个
• 🟠 高危: 7 个
• 🟡 中危: 11 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

TOTOLINK/Realtek Routers - CAPTCHA Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2019-19825
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: On certain TOTOLINK Realtek SDK based routers, the CAPTCHA text can be retrieved via a POST request to the boafrm/formLogin URI with the JSON payload {"topicurl":"setting/getSanvas"}. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass CAPTCHA verification, gaining unauthorized access to restricted functions. Once valid credentials are known or brute-forced, an attacker can fully control the device using HTTP requests and Basic Authentication. Affected router models include A3002RU through 2.0.0, A702R through 2.1.3, N301RT through 2.1.6, N302R through 3.4.0, N300RT through 3.4.0, N200RE through 4.0.0, N150RT through 3.4.0, N100RE through 3.4.0, and other Realtek SDK-derived devices.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2019-19825

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Oracle Identity Manager REST WebServices - Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-61757
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Vulnerability in the Identity Manager product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: REST WebServices). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Identity Manager. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Identity Manager.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-61757

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Jenkins CLI - Java Deserialization

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2017-1000353
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: Jenkins CI/CD
• 预估影响: 数十万个

描述: Jenkins versions 2.56 and earlier as well as 2.46.1 LTS and earlier are vulnerable to an unauthenticated remote code execution. An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability allowed attackers to transfer a serialized Java SignedObject object to the Jenkins CLI, that would be deserialized using a new ObjectInputStream, bypassing the existing blacklist-based protection mechanism. We're fixing this issue by adding SignedObject to the blacklist. We're also backporting the new HTTP CLI protocol from Jenkins 2.54 to LTS 2.46.2, and deprecating the remoting-based (i.e. Java serialization) CLI protocol, disabling it by default.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2017-1000353

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Privileged Remote Access & Remote Support - Command Injection

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-12356
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A critical vulnerability has been discovered in Privileged Remote Access (PRA) and Remote Support (RS) products which can allow an unauthenticated attacker to inject commands that are run as a site user.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-12356

参考链接:

• 参考资料

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-45409
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: GitLab 平台
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. Ruby-SAML in <= 12.2 and 1.13.0 <= 1.16.0 does not properly verify the signature of the SAML Response.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-45409

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GitHub Enterprise - SAML Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-9487
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed SAML SSO authentication to be bypassed resulting in unauthorized provisioning of users and access to the instance. Exploitation required the encrypted assertions feature to be enabled, and the attacker would require direct network access as well as a signed SAML response or metadata document. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.15 and was fixed in versions 3.11.16, 3.12.10, 3.13.5, and 3.14.2. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: GitLab 平台
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-54309
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Django - SQL injection

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2022-34265
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.14 and 4.0 before 4.0.6. The Trunc() and Extract() database functions are subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as a kind/lookup_name value. Applications that constrain the lookup name and kind choice to a known safe list are unaffected.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2022-34265

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Next.js Middleware Authorization Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A critical vulnerability in Next.js middleware allows attackers to bypass authorization checks by manipulating the x-middleware-subrequest header. This flaw affects Next.js versions prior to 14.2.25 and 15.2.3, potentially granting unauthorized access to sensitive resources.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-29927

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

TOTOLINK/Realtek Routers - Information Disclosure

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2019-19823
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A certain router administration interface using Realtek APMIB (e.g., on TOTOLINK models) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to disclose the entire router configuration, including sensitive credentials, via accessing the "config.dat" file. Affected devices include TOTOLINK A3002RU through 2.0.0, A702R through 2.1.3, N301RT through 2.1.6, N302R through 3.4.0, N300RT through 3.4.0, N200RE through 4.0.0, N150RT through 3.4.0, N100RE through 3.4.0, and other Realtek SDK-based devices.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2019-19823

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Sudo <= 1.8.27 - Security Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2019-14287
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: In Sudo before 1.8.28, an attacker with access to a Runas ALL sudoer account can bypass certain policy blacklists and session PAM modules, and can cause incorrect logging, by invoking sudo with a crafted user ID. For example, this allows bypass of !root configuration, and USER= logging, for a "sudo -u #$((0xffffffff))" command.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2019-14287

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-6246
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the __vsyslog_internal function of the glibc library. This function is called by the syslog and vsyslog functions. This issue occurs when the openlog function was not called, or called with the ident argument set to NULL, and the program name (the basename of argv[0]) is bigger than 1024 bytes, resulting in an application crash or local privilege escalation. This issue affects glibc 2.36 and newer.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-6246

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

sqlparse - Denial of Service

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-4340
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Passing a heavily nested list to sqlparse.parse() leads to a Denial of Service due to RecursionError.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-4340

参考链接:

• 参考资料

HTTP API DOM - XSS on JSONP callback

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-29882
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: SRS is a simple, high-efficiency, real-time video server. SRS's /api/v1/vhosts/vid-<id>?callback=<payload> endpoint didn't filter the callback function name which led to injecting malicious javascript payloads and executing XSS ( Cross-Site Scripting). This vulnerability is fixed in 5.0.210 and 6.0.121.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-29882

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Polyfill Supply Chain Attack Malicious Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-38526
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: pdoc provides API Documentation for Python Projects. Documentation generated with pdoc --math linked to JavaScript files from polyfill.io

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-38526

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 - Cross-Site Scripting

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2002-1131
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Virtual Keyboard plugin for SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 is prone to a cross-site scripting vulnerability because it fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2002-1131

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

📋 完整模板列表

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2019/CVE-2019-19825.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-61757.yaml -t code/cves/2017/CVE-2017-1000353.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-12356.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-45409.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t dast/cves/2022/CVE-2022-34265.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS.yaml -t http/cves/2019/CVE-2019-19823.yaml -t code/cves/2019/CVE-2019-14287.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-4340.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-38526.yaml -t http/cves/2002/CVE-2002-1131.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板
nuclei -t http/cves/2019/CVE-2019-19825.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-61757.yaml -t code/cves/2017/CVE-2017-1000353.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-12356.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-45409.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t dast/cves/2022/CVE-2022-34265.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS.yaml -t http/cves/2019/CVE-2019-19823.yaml -t code/cves/2019/CVE-2019-14287.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-4340.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-38526.yaml -t http/cves/2002/CVE-2002-1131.yaml -t http/cves/2017/CVE-2017-14725.yaml -t http/cves/2020/CVE-2020-14179.yaml -t http/cves/2020/CVE-2020-14179.yaml -t headless/cves/2018/CVE-2018-25031.yaml -t headless/cves/2022/CVE-2022-29455-headless.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/cves/2000/CVE-2000-0760.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-0519.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-2428.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试