Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-11-21

📊 智能筛选概况

• 发现变更: 336 个模板更新
• 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
• 智能跳过: 306 个低优先级模板
• 高风险漏洞: 20 个
• 主要类别: CVE漏洞(28), 其他(2)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

• 🔴 严重: 8 个
• 🟠 高危: 12 个
• 🟡 中危: 10 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

Uptime-Kuma - Local File Inclusion (LFI)

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-56331
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Uptime Kuma has an Improper URL Handling vulnerability that can be exploited through the "real-browser" feature. By providing a URL using the file:/// protocol (e.g., file:///etc/passwd), an attacker can obtain a screenshot of local sensitive files, because the user input is not validated by the server.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-56331

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GitHub Enterprise - SAML Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-9487
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed SAML SSO authentication to be bypassed resulting in unauthorized provisioning of users and access to the instance. Exploitation required the encrypted assertions feature to be enabled, and the attacker would require direct network access as well as a signed SAML response or metadata document. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.15 and was fixed in versions 3.11.16, 3.12.10, 3.13.5, and 3.14.2. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: GitLab 平台
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-9242
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: WatchGuard Fireware OS 11.10.2 to 11.12.4_Update1, 12.0 to 12.11.3, and 2025.1 contains an out-of-bounds write caused by improper handling in Mobile User VPN and Branch Office VPN with IKEv2 dynamic gateway peer, letting remote unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-9242

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Spring Framework RCE via Data Binding on JDK 9+

• 漏洞ID: spring4shell-CVE-2022-22965
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2022-22965

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Django - SQL injection

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2022-34265
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.14 and 4.0 before 4.0.6. The Trunc() and Extract() database functions are subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as a kind/lookup_name value. Applications that constrain the lookup name and kind choice to a known safe list are unaffected.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2022-34265

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

TOTOLINK/Realtek Routers - Information Disclosure

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2019-19822
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A certain router administration interface using Realtek APMIB (e.g., on TOTOLINK models) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to disclose the entire router configuration, including sensitive credentials, via accessing the "config.dat" file. Affected devices include TOTOLINK A3002RU through 2.0.0, A702R through 2.1.3, N301RT through 2.1.6, N302R through 3.4.0, N300RT through 3.4.0, N200RE through 4.0.0, N150RT through 3.4.0, N100RE through 3.4.0, and other Realtek SDK-based devices.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2019-19822

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

MPDV Mikrolab GmbH HYDRA X, MIP 2 & FEDRA 2 - Path Traversal

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-12055
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: MPDV Mikrolab GmbH HYDRA X, MIP 2, and FEDRA 2 <= Maintenance Pack 36 with Servicepack 8 (week 36/2025) contain an unauthenticated local file disclosure vulnerability caused by improper validation of the "Filename" parameter in the public $SCHEMAS$ resource, letting attackers read arbitrary Windows OS files, exploit requires local access.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-12055

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

TOTOLINK/Realtek Routers - Information Disclosure

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2019-19822
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A certain router administration interface using Realtek APMIB (e.g., on TOTOLINK models) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to disclose the entire router configuration, including sensitive credentials, via accessing the "config.dat" file. Affected devices include TOTOLINK A3002RU through 2.0.0, A702R through 2.1.3, N301RT through 2.1.6, N302R through 3.4.0, N300RT through 3.4.0, N200RE through 4.0.0, N150RT through 3.4.0, N100RE through 3.4.0, and other Realtek SDK-based devices.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2019-19822

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

TOTOLINK/Realtek Routers - Information Disclosure

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2019-19822
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A certain router administration interface using Realtek APMIB (e.g., on TOTOLINK models) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to disclose the entire router configuration, including sensitive credentials, via accessing the "config.dat" file. Affected devices include TOTOLINK A3002RU through 2.0.0, A702R through 2.1.3, N301RT through 2.1.6, N302R through 3.4.0, N300RT through 3.4.0, N200RE through 4.0.0, N150RT through 3.4.0, N100RE through 3.4.0, and other Realtek SDK-based devices.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2019-19822

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

MPDV Mikrolab GmbH HYDRA X, MIP 2 & FEDRA 2 - Path Traversal

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-12055
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: MPDV Mikrolab GmbH HYDRA X, MIP 2, and FEDRA 2 <= Maintenance Pack 36 with Servicepack 8 (week 36/2025) contain an unauthenticated local file disclosure vulnerability caused by improper validation of the "Filename" parameter in the public $SCHEMAS$ resource, letting attackers read arbitrary Windows OS files, exploit requires local access.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-12055

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

MPDV Mikrolab GmbH HYDRA X, MIP 2 & FEDRA 2 - Path Traversal

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-12055
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: MPDV Mikrolab GmbH HYDRA X, MIP 2, and FEDRA 2 <= Maintenance Pack 36 with Servicepack 8 (week 36/2025) contain an unauthenticated local file disclosure vulnerability caused by improper validation of the "Filename" parameter in the public $SCHEMAS$ resource, letting attackers read arbitrary Windows OS files, exploit requires local access.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-12055

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Sudo <= 1.8.27 - Security Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2019-14287
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: In Sudo before 1.8.28, an attacker with access to a Runas ALL sudoer account can bypass certain policy blacklists and session PAM modules, and can cause incorrect logging, by invoking sudo with a crafted user ID. For example, this allows bypass of !root configuration, and USER= logging, for a "sudo -u #$((0xffffffff))" command.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2019-14287

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GameOver(lay) - Local Privilege Escalation in Ubuntu Kernel

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-2640
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A local privilege escalation vulnerability has been discovered in the OverlayFS module of the Ubuntu kernel. This vulnerability could allow an attacker with local access to escalate their privileges, potentially gaining root-like access to the system.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-2640

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-6246
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the __vsyslog_internal function of the glibc library. This function is called by the syslog and vsyslog functions. This issue occurs when the openlog function was not called, or called with the ident argument set to NULL, and the program name (the basename of argv[0]) is bigger than 1024 bytes, resulting in an application crash or local privilege escalation. This issue affects glibc 2.36 and newer.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-6246

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

PHP - LFR to Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-2961
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: PHP Local File Read vulnerability leading to Remote Code Execution

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-2961

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

HTTP API DOM - XSS on JSONP callback

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-29882
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: SRS is a simple, high-efficiency, real-time video server. SRS's /api/v1/vhosts/vid-<id>?callback=<payload> endpoint didn't filter the callback function name which led to injecting malicious javascript payloads and executing XSS ( Cross-Site Scripting). This vulnerability is fixed in 5.0.210 and 6.0.121.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-29882

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Polyfill Supply Chain Attack Malicious Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-38526
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: pdoc provides API Documentation for Python Projects. Documentation generated with pdoc --math linked to JavaScript files from polyfill.io

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-38526

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

📋 完整模板列表

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-56331.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t dast/cves/2022/CVE-2022-22965.yaml -t dast/cves/2022/CVE-2022-34265.yaml -t http/cves/2019/CVE-2019-19822.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-12055.yaml -t http/cves/2019/CVE-2019-19822.yaml -t http/cves/2019/CVE-2019-19822.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-12055.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-12055.yaml -t code/cves/2019/CVE-2019-14287.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-2640.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t dast/cves/2024/CVE-2024-2961.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-38526.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板
nuclei -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-56331.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t dast/cves/2022/CVE-2022-22965.yaml -t dast/cves/2022/CVE-2022-34265.yaml -t http/cves/2019/CVE-2019-19822.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-12055.yaml -t http/cves/2019/CVE-2019-19822.yaml -t http/cves/2019/CVE-2019-19822.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-12055.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-12055.yaml -t code/cves/2019/CVE-2019-14287.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-2640.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t dast/cves/2024/CVE-2024-2961.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-38526.yaml -t http/cves/2018/CVE-2018-13317.yaml -t http/cves/2017/CVE-2017-17092.yaml -t http/cves/2018/CVE-2018-13317.yaml -t http/cves/2018/CVE-2018-13317.yaml -t http/cves/2017/CVE-2017-17092.yaml -t http/cves/2017/CVE-2017-17092.yaml -t headless/cves/2018/CVE-2018-25031.yaml -t headless/cves/2022/CVE-2022-29455-headless.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/wordpress/wp-security-hidden-login-exposure.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/wordpress/wp-security-hidden-login-exposure.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试