Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-10-06
📊 智能筛选概况
- 发现变更: 606 个模板更新
- 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
- 智能跳过: 576 个低优先级模板
- 高风险漏洞: 22 个
- 主要类别: CVE漏洞(28), 技术识别(2)
💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。
严重程度分布
- 🔴 严重: 12 个
- 🟠 高危: 10 个
- 🟡 中危: 6 个
- ⚪ 信息: 2 个
🔍 重点漏洞分析
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-1550 - CVE:
CVE-2025-1550(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.84981) @ 2026-10-05
描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-25291 - CVE:
CVE-2025-25291(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.20965 (percentile 0.97501) @ 2026-10-05
描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291
参考链接:
Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-32433 - CVE:
CVE-2025-32433(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.98786 (percentile 0.99926) @ 2026-10-05
描述: Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11, and OTP-25.3.2.20, a SSH server may allow an attacker to perform unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in SSH protocol message handling, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems and execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-32433
参考链接:
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6216 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6216(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.47775 (percentile 0.98819) @ 2026-10-05
描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216
参考链接:
Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-8467 - CVE:
CVE-2026-8467(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.02059 (percentile 0.80646) @ 2026-10-05
描述: Phenixdigital phoenix_storybook >=0.5.0 <1.1.0 contains a code injection caused by unsanitized attribute value interpolation in HEEx template generation, letting unauthenticated remote attackers execute arbitrary code on the server, exploit requires sending crafted WebSocket event data.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-8467
参考链接:
Next.js Middleware Authorization Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS - CVE:
CVE-2025-29927(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.99225 (percentile 0.99935) @ 2026-10-05
描述: A critical vulnerability in Next.js middleware allows attackers to bypass authorization checks by manipulating the x-middleware-subrequest header. This flaw affects Next.js versions prior to 14.2.25 and 15.2.3, potentially granting unauthorized access to sensitive resources.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-29927
参考链接:
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-1550 - CVE:
CVE-2025-1550(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.84981) @ 2026-10-05
描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-25291 - CVE:
CVE-2025-25291(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.20965 (percentile 0.97501) @ 2026-10-05
描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291
参考链接:
Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-32433 - CVE:
CVE-2025-32433(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.98786 (percentile 0.99926) @ 2026-10-05
描述: Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11, and OTP-25.3.2.20, a SSH server may allow an attacker to perform unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in SSH protocol message handling, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems and execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-32433
参考链接:
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6216 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6216(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.47775 (percentile 0.98819) @ 2026-10-05
描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216
参考链接:
Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-8467 - CVE:
CVE-2026-8467(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.02059 (percentile 0.80646) @ 2026-10-05
描述: Phenixdigital phoenix_storybook >=0.5.0 <1.1.0 contains a code injection caused by unsanitized attribute value interpolation in HEEx template generation, letting unauthenticated remote attackers execute arbitrary code on the server, exploit requires sending crafted WebSocket event data.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-8467
参考链接:
Next.js Middleware Authorization Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS - CVE:
CVE-2025-29927(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.99225 (percentile 0.99935) @ 2026-10-05
描述: A critical vulnerability in Next.js middleware allows attackers to bypass authorization checks by manipulating the x-middleware-subrequest header. This flaw affects Next.js versions prior to 14.2.25 and 15.2.3, potentially granting unauthorized access to sensitive resources.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-29927
参考链接:
WPForms Pro <= 1.10.1.1 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-10818 - CVE:
CVE-2026-10818(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00712 (percentile 0.51992) @ 2026-10-05
描述: WPForms Pro for WordPress up to and including 1.10.1.1 allows unauthenticated arbitrary file upload. The wpforms_upload_chunk_init, wpforms_upload_chunk and wpforms_file_chunks_uploaded AJAX actions are registered for unauthenticated visitors without a nonce check, and raw chunk bytes are written under wp-content/uploads/wpforms/tmp/ before file extension and MIME type validation happens, so a rejected upload never removes the already written file. An unauthenticated attacker can plant arbitrary files and, depending on server configuration, achieve remote code execution.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-10818
参考链接:
Bifrost < 1.6.3 - Unauthenticated Remote Plugin URL Fetch
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-86242 - CVE:
CVE-2026-86242(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01064 (percentile 0.63465) @ 2026-10-05
描述: When dashboard authentication is disabled, Bifrost accepts an enabled custom plugin with an HTTP URL as its path. The gateway fetches the URL before attempting to load it. This template confirms the unauthenticated server-side request with an out-of-band callback; it does not assert code execution on statically linked builds.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-86242
参考链接:
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6984 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6984(2025) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01647 (percentile 0.75655) @ 2026-10-05
描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984
参考链接:
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-10795 - CVE:
CVE-2026-10795(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.03635 (percentile 0.89206) @ 2026-10-05
描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795
参考链接:
Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalation via AF_ALG
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-31431 - CVE:
CVE-2026-31431(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.03437 (percentile 0.88591) @ 2026-10-05
描述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-31431
参考链接:
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6984 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6984(2025) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01647 (percentile 0.75655) @ 2026-10-05
描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984
参考链接:
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-10795 - CVE:
CVE-2026-10795(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.03635 (percentile 0.89206) @ 2026-10-05
描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795
参考链接:
Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalation via AF_ALG
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-31431 - CVE:
CVE-2026-31431(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.03437 (percentile 0.88591) @ 2026-10-05
描述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-31431
参考链接:
WPForms Pro <= 1.10.1.1 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-10818 - CVE:
CVE-2026-10818(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00712 (percentile 0.51992) @ 2026-10-05
描述: WPForms Pro for WordPress up to and including 1.10.1.1 allows unauthenticated arbitrary file upload. The wpforms_upload_chunk_init, wpforms_upload_chunk and wpforms_file_chunks_uploaded AJAX actions are registered for unauthenticated visitors without a nonce check, and raw chunk bytes are written under wp-content/uploads/wpforms/tmp/ before file extension and MIME type validation happens, so a rejected upload never removes the already written file. An unauthenticated attacker can plant arbitrary files and, depending on server configuration, achieve remote code execution.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-10818
参考链接:
Bifrost < 1.6.3 - Unauthenticated Remote Plugin URL Fetch
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-86242 - CVE:
CVE-2026-86242(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01064 (percentile 0.63465) @ 2026-10-05
描述: When dashboard authentication is disabled, Bifrost accepts an enabled custom plugin with an HTTP URL as its path. The gateway fetches the URL before attempting to load it. This template confirms the unauthenticated server-side request with an out-of-band callback; it does not assert code execution on statically linked builds.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-86242
参考链接:
📋 完整模板列表
| 模板名称 | 严重程度 | 类别 | 影响资产 | EPSS | 风险评分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0263 | 5/5 |
| GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 0.2097 | 5/5 |
| Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.9879 | 5/5 |
| Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.4778 | 5/5 |
| Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0206 | 5/5 |
| Next.js Middleware Authorization Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.9922 | 5/5 |
| Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0263 | 5/5 |
| GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 0.2097 | 5/5 |
| Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.9879 | 5/5 |
| Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.4778 | 5/5 |
| Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0206 | 5/5 |
| Next.js Middleware Authorization Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.9922 | 5/5 |
| WPForms Pro <= 1.10.1.1 - Unauthenticated | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0071 | 4.5/5 |
| Bifrost < 1.6.3 - Unauthenticated Remote Plugin | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0106 | 4.5/5 |
| langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0165 | 4.5/5 |
| UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0364 | 4.5/5 |
| Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalatio | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0344 | 4.5/5 |
| langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0165 | 4.5/5 |
| UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0364 | 4.5/5 |
| Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalatio | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0344 | 4.5/5 |
| WPForms Pro <= 1.10.1.1 - Unauthenticated | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0071 | 4.5/5 |
| Bifrost < 1.6.3 - Unauthenticated Remote Plugin | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0106 | 4.5/5 |
| Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0121 | 3.5/5 |
| Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0172 | 3.5/5 |
| Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0170 | 3.5/5 |
| Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0121 | 3.5/5 |
| Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0172 | 3.5/5 |
| Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0170 | 3.5/5 |
| Paperclip - Detect | ⚪ info | 技术识别 | 通用 | - | 1/5 |
| Paperclip - Detect | ⚪ info | 技术识别 | 通用 | - | 1/5 |
🛡️ 安全建议
🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理
🔧 扫描建议
建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：
# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10818.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-86242.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10818.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-86242.yaml -u target-url
# 扫描所有今日新增模板
nuclei -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10818.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-86242.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10818.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-86242.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/technologies/paperclip-detect.yaml -t http/technologies/paperclip-detect.yaml -u target-url
本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates
扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试