Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-29
📊 智能筛选概况
- 发现变更: 1211 个模板更新
- 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
- 智能跳过: 1181 个低优先级模板
- 高风险漏洞: 24 个
- 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)
💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。
严重程度分布
- 🔴 严重: 15 个
- 🟠 高危: 9 个
- 🟡 中危: 6 个
🔍 重点漏洞分析
GitLab MCP Server < 2.1.27 - Unauthenticated SSE Transport Access
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-61560 - CVE:
CVE-2026-61560(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.00809 (percentile 0.55177) @ 2026-09-27
描述: The @zereight/mcp-gitlab GitLab MCP server exposes its SSE transport endpoints without any authentication when SSE mode is enabled. An unauthenticated attacker with network access can establish an MCP session and invoke every registered tool, including upload_markdown, which reads arbitrary files from the server filesystem via an unsanitized file_path parameter.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-61560
参考链接:
GitLab MCP Server < 2.1.27 - Unauthenticated SSE Transport Access
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-61560 - CVE:
CVE-2026-61560(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.00809 (percentile 0.55177) @ 2026-09-27
描述: The @zereight/mcp-gitlab GitLab MCP server exposes its SSE transport endpoints without any authentication when SSE mode is enabled. An unauthenticated attacker with network access can establish an MCP session and invoke every registered tool, including upload_markdown, which reads arbitrary files from the server filesystem via an unsanitized file_path parameter.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-61560
参考链接:
GitLab MCP Server < 2.1.27 - Unauthenticated SSE Transport Access
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-61560 - CVE:
CVE-2026-61560(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.00809 (percentile 0.55177) @ 2026-09-27
描述: The @zereight/mcp-gitlab GitLab MCP server exposes its SSE transport endpoints without any authentication when SSE mode is enabled. An unauthenticated attacker with network access can establish an MCP session and invoke every registered tool, including upload_markdown, which reads arbitrary files from the server filesystem via an unsanitized file_path parameter.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-61560
参考链接:
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-1550 - CVE:
CVE-2025-1550(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-25291 - CVE:
CVE-2025-25291(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291
参考链接:
Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-8467 - CVE:
CVE-2026-8467(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Phenixdigital phoenix_storybook >=0.5.0 <1.1.0 contains a code injection caused by unsanitized attribute value interpolation in HEEx template generation, letting unauthenticated remote attackers execute arbitrary code on the server, exploit requires sending crafted WebSocket event data.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-8467
参考链接:
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-1550 - CVE:
CVE-2025-1550(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-25291 - CVE:
CVE-2025-25291(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291
参考链接:
Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-32433 - CVE:
CVE-2025-32433(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11, and OTP-25.3.2.20, a SSH server may allow an attacker to perform unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in SSH protocol message handling, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems and execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-32433
参考链接:
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-32463 - CVE:
CVE-2025-32463(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463
参考链接:
CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-54309 - CVE:
CVE-2025-54309(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309
参考链接:
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6216 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6216(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216
参考链接:
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-68926 - CVE:
CVE-2025-68926(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926
参考链接:
WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-9242 - CVE:
CVE-2025-9242(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: WatchGuard Fireware OS 11.10.2 to 11.12.4_Update1, 12.0 to 12.11.3, and 2025.1 contains an out-of-bounds write caused by improper handling in Mobile User VPN and Branch Office VPN with IKEv2 dynamic gateway peer, letting remote unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-9242
参考链接:
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-20182 - CVE:
CVE-2026-20182(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller and Manager contain an authentication bypass caused by improper peering authentication mechanism, letting unauthenticated remote attackers obtain administrative privileges, exploit requires sending crafted requests.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-20182
参考链接:
Dolibarr < 24.0.0 - Authorization Bypass via hashp Parameter
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-89013 - CVE:
CVE-2026-89013(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Dolibarr ERP/CRM versions 23.0.4 through 24.0.0 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in document.php and viewimage.php. The public share-link feature forces NOLOGIN when hashp is present, but the value 'shared' skips token resolution while the override still fires for any non-empty hashp value. This bypass allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files from all Dolibarr managed directories including logs, SQL database backups, invoices, contracts, user vcards, and custom module sources.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-89013
参考链接:
Dolibarr < 24.0.0 - Authorization Bypass via hashp Parameter
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-89013 - CVE:
CVE-2026-89013(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Dolibarr ERP/CRM versions 23.0.4 through 24.0.0 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in document.php and viewimage.php. The public share-link feature forces NOLOGIN when hashp is present, but the value 'shared' skips token resolution while the override still fires for any non-empty hashp value. This bypass allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files from all Dolibarr managed directories including logs, SQL database backups, invoices, contracts, user vcards, and custom module sources.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-89013
参考链接:
Dolibarr < 24.0.0 - Authorization Bypass via hashp Parameter
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-89013 - CVE:
CVE-2026-89013(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Dolibarr ERP/CRM versions 23.0.4 through 24.0.0 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in document.php and viewimage.php. The public share-link feature forces NOLOGIN when hashp is present, but the value 'shared' skips token resolution while the override still fires for any non-empty hashp value. This bypass allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files from all Dolibarr managed directories including logs, SQL database backups, invoices, contracts, user vcards, and custom module sources.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-89013
参考链接:
Dolibarr < 24.0.0 - Authorization Bypass via hashp Parameter
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-89013 - CVE:
CVE-2026-89013(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Dolibarr ERP/CRM versions 23.0.4 through 24.0.0 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in document.php and viewimage.php. The public share-link feature forces NOLOGIN when hashp is present, but the value 'shared' skips token resolution while the override still fires for any non-empty hashp value. This bypass allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files from all Dolibarr managed directories including logs, SQL database backups, invoices, contracts, user vcards, and custom module sources.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-89013
参考链接:
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6984 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6984(2025) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984
参考链接:
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-10795 - CVE:
CVE-2026-10795(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795
参考链接:
Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalation via AF_ALG
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-31431 - CVE:
CVE-2026-31431(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-31431
参考链接:
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6984 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6984(2025) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984
参考链接:
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-10795 - CVE:
CVE-2026-10795(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795
参考链接:
📋 完整模板列表
| 模板名称 | 严重程度 | 类别 | 影响资产 | EPSS | 风险评分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitLab MCP Server < 2.1.27 - Unauthenticated SS | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 0.0081 | 5/5 |
| GitLab MCP Server < 2.1.27 - Unauthenticated SS | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 0.0081 | 5/5 |
| GitLab MCP Server < 2.1.27 - Unauthenticated SS | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 0.0081 | 5/5 |
| Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 5/5 |
| GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | - | 5/5 |
| Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 5/5 |
| Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 5/5 |
| GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | - | 5/5 |
| Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 5/5 |
| Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 5/5 |
| CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 5/5 |
| Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 5/5 |
| RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 5/5 |
| WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 5/5 |
| Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentica | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 5/5 |
| Dolibarr < 24.0.0 - Authorization Bypass via ha | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 4.5/5 |
| Dolibarr < 24.0.0 - Authorization Bypass via ha | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 4.5/5 |
| Dolibarr < 24.0.0 - Authorization Bypass via ha | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 4.5/5 |
| Dolibarr < 24.0.0 - Authorization Bypass via ha | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 4.5/5 |
| langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 4.5/5 |
| UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | - | 4.5/5 |
| Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalatio | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 4.5/5 |
| langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 4.5/5 |
| UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | - | 4.5/5 |
| Signal K Server <= 2.18.0 - Information Di | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 3.5/5 |
| Signal K Server <= 2.18.0 - Information Di | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 3.5/5 |
| Signal K Server <= 2.18.0 - Information Di | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 3.5/5 |
| Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 3.5/5 |
| Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 3.5/5 |
| Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | - | 3.5/5 |
🛡️ 安全建议
🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理
🔧 扫描建议
建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：
# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-61560.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-61560.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-61560.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-89013.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-89013.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-89013.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-89013.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -u target-url
# 扫描所有今日新增模板
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-61560.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-61560.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-61560.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-89013.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-89013.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-89013.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-89013.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68273.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68273.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68273.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -u target-url
本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates
扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试