Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-25

📊 智能筛选概况

• 发现变更: 919 个模板更新
• 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
• 智能跳过: 889 个低优先级模板
• 高风险漏洞: 27 个
• 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

• 🔴 严重: 19 个
• 🟠 高危: 8 个
• 🟡 中危: 3 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

Ray < 2.52.0 - Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-62593
• CVE: CVE-2025-62593 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.2729 (percentile 0.97989) @ 2026-09-24

描述: Ray versions prior to 2.52.0 allow unauthenticated remote code execution via the job submission API at /api/jobs/. A weak User-Agent heuristic (rejecting Mozilla-prefixed headers) can be bypassed by non-browser clients, enabling arbitrary command execution when the dashboard is network-reachable.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-62593

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Ray < 2.52.0 - Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-62593
• CVE: CVE-2025-62593 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.2729 (percentile 0.97989) @ 2026-09-24

描述: Ray versions prior to 2.52.0 allow unauthenticated remote code execution via the job submission API at /api/jobs/. A weak User-Agent heuristic (rejecting Mozilla-prefixed headers) can be bypassed by non-browser clients, enabling arbitrary command execution when the dashboard is network-reachable.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-62593

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Adobe Commerce/Magento - Customer Session Identity Switch

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-71362
• CVE: CVE-2026-71362 (2026)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.02335 (percentile 0.82839) @ 2026-09-24

描述: Adobe Commerce contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability caused by improper access control, letting attackers escalate privileges to access sensitive resources, exploit requires no user interaction.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-71362

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Ray < 2.52.0 - Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-62593
• CVE: CVE-2025-62593 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.2729 (percentile 0.97989) @ 2026-09-24

描述: Ray versions prior to 2.52.0 allow unauthenticated remote code execution via the job submission API at /api/jobs/. A weak User-Agent heuristic (rejecting Mozilla-prefixed headers) can be bypassed by non-browser clients, enabling arbitrary command execution when the dashboard is network-reachable.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-62593

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Adobe Commerce/Magento - Customer Session Identity Switch

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-71362
• CVE: CVE-2026-71362 (2026)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.02335 (percentile 0.82839) @ 2026-09-24

描述: Adobe Commerce contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability caused by improper access control, letting attackers escalate privileges to access sensitive resources, exploit requires no user interaction.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-71362

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
• CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.84844) @ 2026-09-24

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
• CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: GitLab 平台
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.20586 (percentile 0.97432) @ 2026-09-24

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32463
• CVE: CVE-2025-32463 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.61039 (percentile 0.99127) @ 2026-09-24

描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-54309
• CVE: CVE-2025-54309 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.94905 (percentile 0.99858) @ 2026-09-24

描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
• CVE: CVE-2025-6216 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.47775 (percentile 0.98808) @ 2026-09-24

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
• CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.31138 (percentile 0.9821) @ 2026-09-24

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-9242
• CVE: CVE-2025-9242 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.913 (percentile 0.99808) @ 2026-09-24

描述: WatchGuard Fireware OS 11.10.2 to 11.12.4_Update1, 12.0 to 12.11.3, and 2025.1 contains an out-of-bounds write caused by improper handling in Mobile User VPN and Branch Office VPN with IKEv2 dynamic gateway peer, letting remote unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-9242

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-20182
• CVE: CVE-2026-20182 (2026)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.91522 (percentile 0.99811) @ 2026-09-24

描述: Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller and Manager contain an authentication bypass caused by improper peering authentication mechanism, letting unauthenticated remote attackers obtain administrative privileges, exploit requires sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-20182

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GNU Inetutils telnetd - Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-24061
• CVE: CVE-2026-24061 (2026)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.98984 (percentile 0.99929) @ 2026-09-24

描述: GNU Inetutils telnetd through 2.7 contains an authentication bypass caused by setting the USER environment variable to &quot;-f root&quot;, letting remote attackers bypass authentication, exploit requires remote access to telnetd service.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-24061

参考链接:

• 参考资料

Phoenix Storybook - Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-8467
• CVE: CVE-2026-8467 (2026)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.02059 (percentile 0.80472) @ 2026-09-24

描述: Phenixdigital phoenix_storybook >=0.5.0 <1.1.0 contains a code injection caused by unsanitized attribute value interpolation in HEEx template generation, letting unauthenticated remote attackers execute arbitrary code on the server, exploit requires sending crafted WebSocket event data.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-8467

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
• CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.02626 (percentile 0.84844) @ 2026-09-24

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
• CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: GitLab 平台
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.20586 (percentile 0.97432) @ 2026-09-24

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32463
• CVE: CVE-2025-32463 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.61039 (percentile 0.99127) @ 2026-09-24

描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-54309
• CVE: CVE-2025-54309 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.94905 (percentile 0.99858) @ 2026-09-24

描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Asgaros Forum < 3.2.0 - SQL Injection

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-11452
• CVE: CVE-2025-11452 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: WordPress 站点
• 预估影响: 数千万个
• EPSS: 0.00384 (percentile 0.29595) @ 2026-09-24

描述: Asgaros Forum for WordPress versions prior to 3.2.0 is vulnerable to unauthenticated SQL injection through the asgarosforum_unread_exclude cookie. The cookie is JSON-decoded and its object keys are imploded into a NOT IN() clause without sanitisation. The vulnerable query only runs while rendering the forum page, so the payload must be sent there rather than to the site root.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-11452

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

NeuVector - Information Disclosure

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-25703
• CVE: CVE-2026-25703 (2026)
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.00392 (percentile 0.30589) @ 2026-09-24

描述: NeuVector through 5.4.9 contains an information disclosure vulnerability caused by missing authentication and cached sensitive data in the manager /network/graph API, letting remote attackers access sensitive information, exploit requires no special privileges.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-25703

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

9router <=0.5.4 - Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-56681
• CVE: CVE-2026-56681 (2026)
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.00475 (percentile 0.38369) @ 2026-09-24

描述: 9Router prior to 0.5.6 contains an authentication bypass caused by trusting client-supplied X-9r-Real-Ip header in src/dashboardGuard.js, letting remote unauthenticated attackers access local API routes and consume resources, exploit requires bypassing API-key validation via header manipulation.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-56681

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Blue Angel Software Suite (5V Technologies) - OS Command Injection

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-34033
• CVE: CVE-2025-34033 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.03873 (percentile 0.89803) @ 2026-09-24

描述: Blue Angel 5V Technologies Blue Angel Software Suite through 20230920, as used in Analog Telephone Adapter (ATA) and Voice over IP (VoIP) devices, allows remote authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root via shell metacharacters in the ping_addr parameter to webctrl.cgi?action=pingtest_update.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-34033

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Blue Angel Software Suite (5V Technologies) - OS Command Injection

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-34033
• CVE: CVE-2025-34033 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.03873 (percentile 0.89803) @ 2026-09-24

描述: Blue Angel 5V Technologies Blue Angel Software Suite through 20230920, as used in Analog Telephone Adapter (ATA) and Voice over IP (VoIP) devices, allows remote authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root via shell metacharacters in the ping_addr parameter to webctrl.cgi?action=pingtest_update.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-34033

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
• CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.01647 (percentile 0.75428) @ 2026-09-24

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
• CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: WordPress 站点
• 预估影响: 数千万个
• EPSS: 0.03635 (percentile 0.89098) @ 2026-09-24

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalation via AF_ALG

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-31431
• CVE: CVE-2026-31431 (2026)
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.03437 (percentile 0.8849) @ 2026-09-24

描述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-31431

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

📋 完整模板列表

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-62593.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-62593.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-71362.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-62593.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-71362.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-24061.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-11452.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-25703.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-56681.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-34033.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-34033.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-62593.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-62593.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-71362.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-62593.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-71362.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-24061.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-8467.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-11452.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-25703.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-56681.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-34033.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-34033.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试