Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-02

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描威胁情报

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-02

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 614 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 584 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 24 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 17 个
  • 🟠 高危: 7 个
  • 🟡 中危: 6 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

Sangoma Switchvox < 8.4.0.2 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-9586
  • CVE: CVE-2026-9586 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00434 (percentile 0.36259) @ 2026-09-01

描述: Sangoma Switchvox before version 8.4.0.2 contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the /pa endpoint (PhoneAppsHandler.pm). The PhoneIP field extracted from an XML POST body is concatenated directly into an unparameterized PostgreSQL query that runs as a database superuser. An attacker can break out of the single-quoted SQL string context and leverage PostgreSQL COPY TO PROGRAM to execute arbitrary operating system commands without authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-9586

参考链接:

JFrog Artifactory Access Blank Join Key Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-82329
  • CVE: CVE-2026-82329 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00377 (percentile 0.30675) @ 2026-09-01

描述: JFrog Artifactory contains an authentication weakness that, under default configuration, may allow an unauthenticated attacker with network access to obtain administrative privileges.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-82329

参考链接:

Sangoma Switchvox < 8.4.0.2 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-9586
  • CVE: CVE-2026-9586 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00434 (percentile 0.36259) @ 2026-09-01

描述: Sangoma Switchvox before version 8.4.0.2 contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the /pa endpoint (PhoneAppsHandler.pm). The PhoneIP field extracted from an XML POST body is concatenated directly into an unparameterized PostgreSQL query that runs as a database superuser. An attacker can break out of the single-quoted SQL string context and leverage PostgreSQL COPY TO PROGRAM to execute arbitrary operating system commands without authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-9586

参考链接:

mJobTime <= 15.7.2 - Unauthenticated Blind SQL Injection to RCE

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-51683
  • CVE: CVE-2025-51683 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00439 (percentile 0.36678) @ 2026-09-01

描述: mJobtime v15.7.2 contains a sql injection caused by crafted POST request to /Default.aspx/update_profile_Server, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary SQL statements remotely, exploit requires no special privileges.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-51683

参考链接:

Tutor LMS < 4.0.6 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary PHP Function Invocation

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-19092
  • CVE: CVE-2026-19092 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00352 (percentile 0.27998) @ 2026-09-01

描述: Tutor LMS WordPress plugin < 4.0.6 contains a template injection caused by insufficient prevention of request data overwriting internal variables during template rendering, letting unauthenticated attackers invoke arbitrary zero-argument PHP functions and receive their output.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-19092

参考链接:

mJobTime <= 15.7.2 - Unauthenticated Blind SQL Injection to RCE

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-51683
  • CVE: CVE-2025-51683 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00439 (percentile 0.36678) @ 2026-09-01

描述: mJobtime v15.7.2 contains a sql injection caused by crafted POST request to /Default.aspx/update_profile_Server, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary SQL statements remotely, exploit requires no special privileges.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-51683

参考链接:

JFrog Artifactory Access Blank Join Key Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-82329
  • CVE: CVE-2026-82329 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00377 (percentile 0.30675) @ 2026-09-01

描述: JFrog Artifactory contains an authentication weakness that, under default configuration, may allow an unauthenticated attacker with network access to obtain administrative privileges.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-82329

参考链接:

Sangoma Switchvox < 8.4.0.2 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-9586
  • CVE: CVE-2026-9586 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00434 (percentile 0.36259) @ 2026-09-01

描述: Sangoma Switchvox before version 8.4.0.2 contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the /pa endpoint (PhoneAppsHandler.pm). The PhoneIP field extracted from an XML POST body is concatenated directly into an unparameterized PostgreSQL query that runs as a database superuser. An attacker can break out of the single-quoted SQL string context and leverage PostgreSQL COPY TO PROGRAM to execute arbitrary operating system commands without authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-9586

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02581 (percentile 0.84132) @ 2026-09-01

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.2026 (percentile 0.97287) @ 2026-09-01

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.31362 (percentile 0.9815) @ 2026-09-01

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-9242
  • CVE: CVE-2025-9242 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.913 (percentile 0.99802) @ 2026-09-01

描述: WatchGuard Fireware OS 11.10.2 to 11.12.4_Update1, 12.0 to 12.11.3, and 2025.1 contains an out-of-bounds write caused by improper handling in Mobile User VPN and Branch Office VPN with IKEv2 dynamic gateway peer, letting remote unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-9242

参考链接:

Sangoma Switchvox < 8.4.0.2 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-9586
  • CVE: CVE-2026-9586 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00434 (percentile 0.36259) @ 2026-09-01

描述: Sangoma Switchvox before version 8.4.0.2 contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the /pa endpoint (PhoneAppsHandler.pm). The PhoneIP field extracted from an XML POST body is concatenated directly into an unparameterized PostgreSQL query that runs as a database superuser. An attacker can break out of the single-quoted SQL string context and leverage PostgreSQL COPY TO PROGRAM to execute arbitrary operating system commands without authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-9586

参考链接:

JFrog Artifactory Access Blank Join Key Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-82329
  • CVE: CVE-2026-82329 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00377 (percentile 0.30675) @ 2026-09-01

描述: JFrog Artifactory contains an authentication weakness that, under default configuration, may allow an unauthenticated attacker with network access to obtain administrative privileges.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-82329

参考链接:

mJobTime <= 15.7.2 - Unauthenticated Blind SQL Injection to RCE

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-51683
  • CVE: CVE-2025-51683 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00439 (percentile 0.36678) @ 2026-09-01

描述: mJobtime v15.7.2 contains a sql injection caused by crafted POST request to /Default.aspx/update_profile_Server, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary SQL statements remotely, exploit requires no special privileges.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-51683

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02581 (percentile 0.84132) @ 2026-09-01

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.2026 (percentile 0.97287) @ 2026-09-01

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

GeoNetwork - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-57582
  • CVE: CVE-2026-57582 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: GeoNetwork versions 4.4.5 through 4.4.11 are vulnerable to reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) in the public unauthenticated catalog search functionality. The uiconfig query parameter of the catalog.search endpoint is reflected into a JavaScript context without sufficient sanitization, allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution in a victim's browser.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-57582

参考链接:

GeoNetwork - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-57582
  • CVE: CVE-2026-57582 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: GeoNetwork versions 4.4.5 through 4.4.11 are vulnerable to reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) in the public unauthenticated catalog search functionality. The uiconfig query parameter of the catalog.search endpoint is reflected into a JavaScript context without sufficient sanitization, allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution in a victim's browser.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-57582

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01661 (percentile 0.75009) @ 2026-09-01

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88575) @ 2026-09-01

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

GeoNetwork - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-57582
  • CVE: CVE-2026-57582 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: GeoNetwork versions 4.4.5 through 4.4.11 are vulnerable to reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) in the public unauthenticated catalog search functionality. The uiconfig query parameter of the catalog.search endpoint is reflected into a JavaScript context without sufficient sanitization, allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution in a victim's browser.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-57582

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01661 (percentile 0.75009) @ 2026-09-01

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88575) @ 2026-09-01

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产EPSS风险评分
Sangoma Switchvox < 8.4.0.2 - Unauthenticated S🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00435/5
JFrog Artifactory Access Blank Join Key Authentica🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00385/5
Sangoma Switchvox < 8.4.0.2 - Unauthenticated S🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00435/5
mJobTime <= 15.7.2 - Unauthenticated Blind🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00445/5
Tutor LMS < 4.0.6 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary P🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00355/5
mJobTime <= 15.7.2 - Unauthenticated Blind🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00445/5
JFrog Artifactory Access Blank Join Key Authentica🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00385/5
Sangoma Switchvox < 8.4.0.2 - Unauthenticated S🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00435/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02585/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.20265/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.31365/5
WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.91305/5
Sangoma Switchvox < 8.4.0.2 - Unauthenticated S🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00435/5
JFrog Artifactory Access Blank Join Key Authentica🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00385/5
mJobTime <= 15.7.2 - Unauthenticated Blind🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00445/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02585/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.20265/5
GeoNetwork - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting🟠 highCVE漏洞通用-4.5/5
GeoNetwork - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting🟠 highCVE漏洞通用-4.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01664.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.03584.5/5
GeoNetwork - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting🟠 highCVE漏洞通用-4.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01664.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.03584.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01203.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01723.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01683.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01203.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01723.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01683.5/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-9586.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-82329.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-9586.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-51683.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-19092.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-51683.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-82329.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-9586.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-9586.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-82329.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-51683.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-57582.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-57582.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-57582.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-9586.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-82329.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-9586.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-51683.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-19092.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-51683.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-82329.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-9586.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-9586.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-82329.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-51683.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-57582.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-57582.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-57582.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-01
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-09-01

4 个共同标签

从 302 个模板更新中精选分析 9 个高价值 POC，发现 4 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-31

4 个共同标签

从 908 个模板更新中精选分析 28 个高价值 POC，发现 23 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-30

4 个共同标签

从 914 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 24 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-29

4 个共同标签

从 300 个模板更新中精选分析 15 个高价值 POC，发现 12 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-28

4 个共同标签

从 303 个模板更新中精选分析 9 个高价值 POC，发现 6 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章