Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-10
📊 智能筛选概况
- 发现变更: 608 个模板更新
- 精选分析: 23 个高价值 POC
- 智能跳过: 585 个低优先级模板
- 高风险漏洞: 14 个
- 主要类别: CVE漏洞(20), 其他(3)
💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板,跳过低价值的技术识别类模板,确保高效利用 API 资源。
严重程度分布
- 🔴 严重: 8 个
- 🟠 高危: 6 个
- 🟡 中危: 6 个
- ⚪ 信息: 3 个
🔍 重点漏洞分析
JetBrains TeamCity < 2026.1.3, 2025.11.7 - Remote Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-63077 - CVE:
CVE-2026-63077(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.0101 (percentile 0.59837) @ 2026-08-09
描述: JetBrains TeamCity < 2026.1.3, 2025.11.7 contains a remote code execution caused by unauthenticated access via the agent polling protocol, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code remotely, exploit requires no authentication.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-63077
参考链接:
CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-54309 - CVE:
CVE-2025-54309(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.94362 (percentile 0.99843) @ 2026-08-09
描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309
参考链接:
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-1550 - CVE:
CVE-2025-1550(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.02581 (percentile 0.83741) @ 2026-08-09
描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-25291 - CVE:
CVE-2025-25291(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.2026 (percentile 0.97221) @ 2026-08-09
描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291
参考链接:
Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-32433 - CVE:
CVE-2025-32433(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.98594 (percentile 0.99918) @ 2026-08-09
描述: Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11, and OTP-25.3.2.20, a SSH server may allow an attacker to perform unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in SSH protocol message handling, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems and execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-32433
参考链接:
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-32463 - CVE:
CVE-2025-32463(2025) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.56337 (percentile 0.98959) @ 2026-08-09
描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463
参考链接:
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-20182 - CVE:
CVE-2026-20182(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.90272 (percentile 0.99786) @ 2026-08-09
描述: Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller and Manager contain an authentication bypass caused by improper peering authentication mechanism, letting unauthenticated remote attackers obtain administrative privileges, exploit requires sending crafted requests.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-20182
参考链接:
WordPress Super Forms <= 6.3.313 - Arbitrary File Upload
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-14894 - CVE:
CVE-2026-14894(2026) - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.02803 (percentile 0.85125) @ 2026-08-09
描述: Super Forms – Drag & Drop Form Builder WordPress plugin \u003C= 6.3.313 contains an arbitrary file upload vulnerability caused by missing file type validation and lack of capability checks in submit_form nopriv AJAX handler, letting unauthenticated attackers upload executable files and achieve remote code execution, exploit requires no authentication due to nonce bypass.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-14894
参考链接:
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6984 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6984(2025) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01661 (percentile 0.74423) @ 2026-08-09
描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984
参考链接:
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6984 - CVE:
CVE-2025-6984(2025) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01661 (percentile 0.74423) @ 2026-08-09
描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984
参考链接:
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-10795 - CVE:
CVE-2026-10795(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88284) @ 2026-08-09
描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795
参考链接:
Flowise - Path Traversal
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-71324 - CVE:
CVE-2025-71324(2025) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.01379 (percentile 0.69501) @ 2026-08-09
描述: Flowise < 3.0.6 contains a path traversal vulnerability caused by improper validation of the chatId parameter in /api/v1/get-upload-file and /api/v1/openai-assistants-file/download endpoints, letting unauthenticated attackers read arbitrary files including sensitive database files.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-71324
参考链接:
MLflow < 3.10.0 - Authentication Bypass on FastAPI Routes
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-2652 - CVE:
CVE-2026-2652(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
- EPSS: 0.18861 (percentile 0.97013) @ 2026-08-09
描述: A vulnerability in mlflow/mlflow versions 3.9.0 and earlier allows unauthenticated access to certain FastAPI routes when the server is started with authentication enabled (--app-name basic-auth) and served via uvicorn (ASGI). The FastAPI permission middleware only enforces authentication on /gateway/ routes, leaving other routes such as the Job API (/ajax-api/3.0/jobs/*) and the OpenTelemetry trace ingestion API (/v1/traces) unprotected. This allows unauthenticated remote attackers to submit jobs, read job results, cancel running jobs, and inject arbitrary trace data into experiments. The issue arises from an architectural mismatch between Flask and FastAPI authentication mechanisms, where the _find_fastapi_validator() function fails to handle non-/gateway/ paths, resulting in a complete authentication bypass. This vulnerability is fixed in version 3.10.0.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-2652
参考链接:
FormCraft3 <= 3.9.15 - Server-Side Request Forgery
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2026-65442 - CVE:
CVE-2026-65442(2026) - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
- EPSS: 0.00341 (percentile 0.26794) @ 2026-08-09
描述: Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in FormCraft <= 3.9.15 versions.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2026-65442
参考链接:
📋 完整模板列表
| 模板名称 | 严重程度 | 类别 | 影响资产 | EPSS | 风险评分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JetBrains TeamCity < 2026.1.3, 2025.11.7 - Remo | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0101 | 5/5 |
| CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.9436 | 5/5 |
| Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0258 | 5/5 |
| GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 0.2026 | 5/5 |
| Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.9859 | 5/5 |
| Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.5634 | 5/5 |
| Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentica | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.9027 | 5/5 |
| WordPress Super Forms <= 6.3.313 - Arbitra | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0280 | 5/5 |
| langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0166 | 4.5/5 |
| langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0166 | 4.5/5 |
| UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0358 | 4.5/5 |
| Flowise - Path Traversal | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0138 | 4.5/5 |
| MLflow < 3.10.0 - Authentication Bypass on Fast | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.1886 | 4.5/5 |
| FormCraft3 <= 3.9.15 - Server-Side Request | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 0.0034 | 4.5/5 |
| Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0120 | 3.5/5 |
| Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0169 | 3.5/5 |
| Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0165 | 3.5/5 |
| Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0120 | 3.5/5 |
| Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0169 | 3.5/5 |
| Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 0.0165 | 3.5/5 |
| Ed1s0nZ CyberStrikeAI - Panel | ⚪ info | 其他 | 管理面板 | - | 1/5 |
| Ed1s0nZ CyberStrikeAI - Panel | ⚪ info | 其他 | 管理面板 | - | 1/5 |
| Ed1s0nZ CyberStrikeAI - Panel | ⚪ info | 其他 | 管理面板 | - | 1/5 |
🛡️ 安全建议
🚨 发现高风险漏洞,建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞,及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞,优先处理
🔧 扫描建议
建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描:
# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-63077.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-14894.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-71324.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-2652.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-65442.yaml -u target-url
# 扫描所有今日新增模板
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-63077.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-14894.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-71324.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-2652.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-65442.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/exposed-panels/cyberstrikeai-panel.yaml -t http/exposed-panels/cyberstrikeai-panel.yaml -t http/exposed-panels/cyberstrikeai-panel.yaml -u target-url
本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成,数据来源:ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates
扫描建议仅供参考,请在授权环境下进行安全测试