Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-08

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描威胁情报

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-08

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 905 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 875 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 24 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 17 个
  • 🟠 高危: 7 个
  • 🟡 中危: 6 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02581 (percentile 0.83736) @ 2026-08-07

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.19506 (percentile 0.97111) @ 2026-08-07

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32433
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32433 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.98594 (percentile 0.99919) @ 2026-08-07

描述: Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11, and OTP-25.3.2.20, a SSH server may allow an attacker to perform unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in SSH protocol message handling, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems and execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32433

参考链接:

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6216 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.34535 (percentile 0.98262) @ 2026-08-07

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.2903 (percentile 0.97978) @ 2026-08-07

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02581 (percentile 0.83736) @ 2026-08-07

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.19506 (percentile 0.97111) @ 2026-08-07

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32433
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32433 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.98594 (percentile 0.99919) @ 2026-08-07

描述: Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11, and OTP-25.3.2.20, a SSH server may allow an attacker to perform unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in SSH protocol message handling, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems and execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32433

参考链接:

Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32463
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32463 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.54935 (percentile 0.98929) @ 2026-08-07

描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463

参考链接:

Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalation via AF_ALG

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-31431
  • CVE: CVE-2026-31431 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.99907 (percentile 0.99967) @ 2026-08-07

描述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: algif_aead - Revert to operating out-of-place This mostly reverts commit 72548b093ee3 except for the copying of the associated data. There is no benefit in operating in-place in algif_aead since the source and destination come from different mappings. Get rid of all the complexity added for in-place operation and just copy the AD directly.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-31431

参考链接:

Next.js Middleware Authorization Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS
  • CVE: CVE-2025-29927 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.99301 (percentile 0.99935) @ 2026-08-07

描述: A critical vulnerability in Next.js middleware allows attackers to bypass authorization checks by manipulating the x-middleware-subrequest header. This flaw affects Next.js versions prior to 14.2.25 and 15.2.3, potentially granting unauthorized access to sensitive resources.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-29927

参考链接:

React Native Community CLI - Unauthenticated OS Command Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-11953
  • CVE: CVE-2025-11953 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.61921 (percentile 0.99095) @ 2026-08-07

描述: The Metro development server started by the React Native Community CLI binds to external network interfaces by default and exposes an unauthenticated /open-url endpoint. Affected versions pass the attacker supplied url value straight to the open() helper without validating the scheme, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to launch arbitrary executables on the developer machine. On Windows the request is dispatched through cmd, which permits arbitrary shell commands with fully controlled arguments. The fix was released as a backport across several release lines, so the version number alone does not indicate whether an instance is affected, and this template probes the endpoint behaviour instead.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-11953

参考链接:

Joomla iCagenda < 3.9.10 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload RCE

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-48939
  • CVE: CVE-2026-48939 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: Joomla 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.82501 (percentile 0.99634) @ 2026-08-07

描述: iCagenda extension for Joomla contains an unrestricted file upload vulnerability in the file attachment feature, letting attackers upload and execute arbitrary PHP code, exploit requires no special privileges.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-48939

参考链接:

Kestra <= 1.3.20 - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-53576
  • CVE: CVE-2026-53576 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02186 (percentile 0.80683) @ 2026-08-07

描述: Kestra <= 1.3.20 contains an authentication bypass caused by misclassification of /configs endpoint in REST API filter, letting unauthenticated attackers create and execute root-level tasks, exploit requires unauthenticated access to /configs endpoint.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-53576

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02581 (percentile 0.83736) @ 2026-08-07

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.19506 (percentile 0.97111) @ 2026-08-07

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32433
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32433 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.98594 (percentile 0.99919) @ 2026-08-07

描述: Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11, and OTP-25.3.2.20, a SSH server may allow an attacker to perform unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in SSH protocol message handling, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems and execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32433

参考链接:

Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32463
  • CVE: CVE-2025-32463 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.54935 (percentile 0.98929) @ 2026-08-07

描述: Sudo before 1.9.17p1 allows local users to obtain root access by using /etc/nsswitch.conf from a user-controlled directory with the --chroot (-R) option.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32463

参考链接:

WordPress Core < 7.0.3 - Preauth Reflected XSS (XSS2Shell)

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-64638
  • CVE: CVE-2026-64638 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个

描述: Pre-authentication reflected XSS in WordPress wp-login.php (CVE-2026-64638). The flaw exploits a parser differential between PHP strip_tags() and WordPress KSES. Tags with whitespace after < (e.g. "< area") survive strip_tags() but are normalized to valid HTML by KSES, leading to attacker-controlled DOM elements that trigger automatic JavaScript execution via user-profile.js. No user interaction required. Affects all WordPress versions < 7.0.3.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-64638

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01661 (percentile 0.7442) @ 2026-08-07

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88279) @ 2026-08-07

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

WordPress Core < 7.0.3 - Preauth Reflected XSS (XSS2Shell)

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-64638
  • CVE: CVE-2026-64638 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个

描述: Pre-authentication reflected XSS in WordPress wp-login.php (CVE-2026-64638). The flaw exploits a parser differential between PHP strip_tags() and WordPress KSES. Tags with whitespace after < (e.g. "< area") survive strip_tags() but are normalized to valid HTML by KSES, leading to attacker-controlled DOM elements that trigger automatic JavaScript execution via user-profile.js. No user interaction required. Affects all WordPress versions < 7.0.3.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-64638

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01661 (percentile 0.7442) @ 2026-08-07

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88279) @ 2026-08-07

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产EPSS风险评分
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02585/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.19515/5
Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.98595/5
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.34535/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.29035/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02585/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.19515/5
Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.98595/5
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.54945/5
Copy Fail - Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalatio🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.99915/5
Next.js Middleware Authorization Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.99305/5
React Native Community CLI - Unauthenticated OS Co🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.61925/5
Joomla iCagenda < 3.9.10 - Unauthenticated Arbi🔴 criticalCVE漏洞Joomla 站点0.82505/5
Kestra <= 1.3.20 - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02195/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02585/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.19515/5
Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.98595/5
Sudo - Local Privilege Escalation via chroot🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.54945/5
WordPress Core < 7.0.3 - Preauth Reflected XSS🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点-4.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01664.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.03584.5/5
WordPress Core < 7.0.3 - Preauth Reflected XSS🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点-4.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01664.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.03584.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01203.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01693.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01653.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01203.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01693.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01653.5/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-11953.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-48939.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-53576.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-64638.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-64638.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-31431.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-11953.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-48939.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-53576.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32463.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-64638.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-64638.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-07
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-07

4 个共同标签

从 611 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 23 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-06

4 个共同标签

从 306 个模板更新中精选分析 14 个高价值 POC，发现 11 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-05

4 个共同标签

从 611 个模板更新中精选分析 25 个高价值 POC，发现 17 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-04

4 个共同标签

从 363 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 12 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-03

4 个共同标签

从 608 个模板更新中精选分析 25 个高价值 POC，发现 18 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章