Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-03

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描威胁情报

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-03

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 608 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 25 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 583 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 18 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(24), 其他(1)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 13 个
  • 🟠 高危: 5 个
  • 🟡 中危: 6 个
  • ⚪ 信息: 1 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

Gitea <= 1.27.0 - Pre-Auth Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-60004
  • CVE: CVE-2026-60004 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Gitea versions 1.17 through 1.27.0 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the diffpatch endpoint caused by an add/add collision that writes an executable Git hook into the bare repository's GIT_DIR. An attacker with write access can execute arbitrary commands as the Gitea service account, exploit requires only open registration for unauthenticated access.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-60004

参考链接:

Gitea <= 1.27.0 - Pre-Auth Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-60004
  • CVE: CVE-2026-60004 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Gitea versions 1.17 through 1.27.0 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the diffpatch endpoint caused by an add/add collision that writes an executable Git hook into the bare repository's GIT_DIR. An attacker with write access can execute arbitrary commands as the Gitea service account, exploit requires only open registration for unauthenticated access.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-60004

参考链接:

WordPress Age Gate <= 3.5.3 - Unauthenticated Local File Inclusion

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-2505
  • CVE: CVE-2025-2505 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.01229 (percentile 0.65918) @ 2026-08-02

描述: The Age Gate plugin for WordPress up to version 3.5.3 contains a local PHP file inclusion caused by the 'lang' parameter, letting unauthenticated attackers include and execute arbitrary PHP files, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-2505

参考链接:

WordPress Age Gate <= 3.5.3 - Unauthenticated Local File Inclusion

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-2505
  • CVE: CVE-2025-2505 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.01229 (percentile 0.65918) @ 2026-08-02

描述: The Age Gate plugin for WordPress up to version 3.5.3 contains a local PHP file inclusion caused by the 'lang' parameter, letting unauthenticated attackers include and execute arbitrary PHP files, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-2505

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02803 (percentile 0.85062) @ 2026-08-02

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-54309
  • CVE: CVE-2025-54309 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.92034 (percentile 0.9981) @ 2026-08-02

描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309

参考链接:

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6216 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.34535 (percentile 0.98257) @ 2026-08-02

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-20182
  • CVE: CVE-2026-20182 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.90272 (percentile 0.99787) @ 2026-08-02

描述: Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller and Manager contain an authentication bypass caused by improper peering authentication mechanism, letting unauthenticated remote attackers obtain administrative privileges, exploit requires sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-20182

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02803 (percentile 0.85062) @ 2026-08-02

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.19506 (percentile 0.97099) @ 2026-08-02

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-54309
  • CVE: CVE-2025-54309 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.92034 (percentile 0.9981) @ 2026-08-02

描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309

参考链接:

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-20182
  • CVE: CVE-2026-20182 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.90272 (percentile 0.99787) @ 2026-08-02

描述: Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller and Manager contain an authentication bypass caused by improper peering authentication mechanism, letting unauthenticated remote attackers obtain administrative privileges, exploit requires sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-20182

参考链接:

Gitea <= 1.27.0 - Pre-Auth Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-60004
  • CVE: CVE-2026-60004 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Gitea versions 1.17 through 1.27.0 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the diffpatch endpoint caused by an add/add collision that writes an executable Git hook into the bare repository's GIT_DIR. An attacker with write access can execute arbitrary commands as the Gitea service account, exploit requires only open registration for unauthenticated access.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-60004

参考链接:

LiteLLM 1.18.10 - Command Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-30623
  • CVE: CVE-2026-30623 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01672 (percentile 0.74513) @ 2026-08-02

描述: LiteLLM 1.18.10 contains a remote code execution caused by lack of validation of arbitrary command and args in MCP server creation, letting attackers execute OS commands remotely, exploit requires crafted JSON configuration.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-30623

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01531 (percentile 0.72252) @ 2026-08-02

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88233) @ 2026-08-02

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01531 (percentile 0.72252) @ 2026-08-02

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88233) @ 2026-08-02

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产EPSS风险评分
Gitea <= 1.27.0 - Pre-Auth Remote Code Exe🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用-5/5
Gitea <= 1.27.0 - Pre-Auth Remote Code Exe🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用-5/5
WordPress Age Gate <= 3.5.3 - Unauthentica🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.01235/5
WordPress Age Gate <= 3.5.3 - Unauthentica🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.01235/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02805/5
CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.92035/5
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.34535/5
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentica🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.90275/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02805/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.19515/5
CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.92035/5
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller - vHub Authentica🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.90275/5
Gitea <= 1.27.0 - Pre-Auth Remote Code Exe🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用-5/5
LiteLLM 1.18.10 - Command Injection🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01674.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01534.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.03584.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01534.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.03584.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01203.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01663.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01653.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01203.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01663.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01653.5/5
HTaccess config file⚪ info其他通用-1/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-60004.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-60004.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-2505.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-2505.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-60004.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-30623.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-60004.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-60004.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-2505.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-2505.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-20182.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-60004.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-30623.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/miscellaneous/htaccess-config.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-02
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-02

4 个共同标签

从 614 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 12 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-08-01

4 个共同标签

从 608 个模板更新中精选分析 25 个高价值 POC，发现 19 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-31

4 个共同标签

从 611 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 24 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-30

4 个共同标签

从 312 个模板更新中精选分析 22 个高价值 POC，发现 17 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-29

4 个共同标签

从 616 个模板更新中精选分析 29 个高价值 POC，发现 16 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章