Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-24

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描威胁情报

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-24

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 403 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 373 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 24 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(22), 其他(8)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 14 个
  • 🟠 高危: 10 个
  • 🟡 中危: 4 个
  • 🔵 低危: 1 个
  • ⚪ 信息: 1 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

Arelle < 2.39.10 - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-42796
  • CVE: CVE-2026-42796 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00732 (percentile 0.50513) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Arelle before 2.39.10 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the webserver's /rest/configure endpoint. The plugins query parameter is forwarded to the plugin manager without authentication, allowing an attacker to supply a URL to a remote Python file that Arelle downloads and executes within its process.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-42796

参考链接:

Directus - Unauthenticated File Modification

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-55746
  • CVE: CVE-2025-55746 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00469 (percentile 0.37923) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Directus versions from 10.8.0 before 11.9.3 allow unauthenticated attackers to modify the contents of an existing file when a valid file UUID is known. The PATCH /files/{id} endpoint processes multipart file uploads without proper authentication, allowing file content replacement despite returning a 403 status code. This template requires a known, controlled Directus file UUID provided via the file_id variable.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-55746

参考链接:

Dockwatch <= 0.6.567 - OS Command Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-58455
  • CVE: CVE-2026-58455 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.0119 (percentile 0.64681) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Dockwatch through 0.6.567 contains an unauthenticated command injection caused by missing exit() after authentication redirect in loader.php and unsanitized input in ajax/compose.php, letting remote attackers execute arbitrary shell commands, exploit requires seeding a session flag via incomplete auth check.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-58455

参考链接:

Windmill < 1.603.3 - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-23696
  • CVE: CVE-2026-23696 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.05064 (percentile 0.91431) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Windmill versions 1.276.0 through 1.603.2 contain an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the folder owner management endpoint. The addowner API endpoint passes user-supplied input directly into a SQL query without sanitization, enabling JSONB path injection. An authenticated user with operator-level access can extract sensitive data including JWT secrets, password hashes, API tokens, and database credentials, leading to full privilege escalation and remote code execution.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-23696

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02803 (percentile 0.84993) @ 2026-07-23

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.19506 (percentile 0.97092) @ 2026-07-23

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6216 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.3072 (percentile 0.98057) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

Arelle < 2.39.10 - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-42796
  • CVE: CVE-2026-42796 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00732 (percentile 0.50513) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Arelle before 2.39.10 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the webserver's /rest/configure endpoint. The plugins query parameter is forwarded to the plugin manager without authentication, allowing an attacker to supply a URL to a remote Python file that Arelle downloads and executes within its process.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-42796

参考链接:

Directus - Unauthenticated File Modification

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-55746
  • CVE: CVE-2025-55746 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00469 (percentile 0.37923) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Directus versions from 10.8.0 before 11.9.3 allow unauthenticated attackers to modify the contents of an existing file when a valid file UUID is known. The PATCH /files/{id} endpoint processes multipart file uploads without proper authentication, allowing file content replacement despite returning a 403 status code. This template requires a known, controlled Directus file UUID provided via the file_id variable.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-55746

参考链接:

Dockwatch <= 0.6.567 - OS Command Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-58455
  • CVE: CVE-2026-58455 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.0119 (percentile 0.64681) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Dockwatch through 0.6.567 contains an unauthenticated command injection caused by missing exit() after authentication redirect in loader.php and unsanitized input in ajax/compose.php, letting remote attackers execute arbitrary shell commands, exploit requires seeding a session flag via incomplete auth check.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-58455

参考链接:

Directus - Unauthenticated File Modification

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-55746
  • CVE: CVE-2025-55746 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00469 (percentile 0.37923) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Directus versions from 10.8.0 before 11.9.3 allow unauthenticated attackers to modify the contents of an existing file when a valid file UUID is known. The PATCH /files/{id} endpoint processes multipart file uploads without proper authentication, allowing file content replacement despite returning a 403 status code. This template requires a known, controlled Directus file UUID provided via the file_id variable.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-55746

参考链接:

Directus - Unauthenticated File Modification

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-55746
  • CVE: CVE-2025-55746 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00469 (percentile 0.37923) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Directus versions from 10.8.0 before 11.9.3 allow unauthenticated attackers to modify the contents of an existing file when a valid file UUID is known. The PATCH /files/{id} endpoint processes multipart file uploads without proper authentication, allowing file content replacement despite returning a 403 status code. This template requires a known, controlled Directus file UUID provided via the file_id variable.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-55746

参考链接:

Windmill < 1.603.3 - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-23696
  • CVE: CVE-2026-23696 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.05064 (percentile 0.91431) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Windmill versions 1.276.0 through 1.603.2 contain an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the folder owner management endpoint. The addowner API endpoint passes user-supplied input directly into a SQL query without sanitization, enabling JSONB path injection. An authenticated user with operator-level access can extract sensitive data including JWT secrets, password hashes, API tokens, and database credentials, leading to full privilege escalation and remote code execution.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-23696

参考链接:

Windmill < 1.603.3 - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-23696
  • CVE: CVE-2026-23696 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.05064 (percentile 0.91431) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Windmill versions 1.276.0 through 1.603.2 contain an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the folder owner management endpoint. The addowner API endpoint passes user-supplied input directly into a SQL query without sanitization, enabling JSONB path injection. An authenticated user with operator-level access can extract sensitive data including JWT secrets, password hashes, API tokens, and database credentials, leading to full privilege escalation and remote code execution.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-23696

参考链接:

Windmill < 1.603.3 - Operator Authorization Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-22683
  • CVE: CVE-2026-22683 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00678 (percentile 0.48499) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Windmill versions 1.276.0 through 1.603.2 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the folder management API endpoints. The endpoints for creating, deleting, and managing folder ownership do not enforce role-based access control for operator-level users. In Windmill, operators are restricted users intended to only execute existing scripts, but due to missing server-side authorization checks, operators can create folders, manage folder permissions, and access owner management endpoints. This bypass serves as the prerequisite for exploiting CVE-2026-23696 (SQL injection via folder addowner) enabling full privilege escalation from operator to super admin with remote code execution.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-22683

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01531 (percentile 0.72116) @ 2026-07-23

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.88182) @ 2026-07-23

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

Windmill < 1.603.3 - Operator Authorization Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-22683
  • CVE: CVE-2026-22683 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00678 (percentile 0.48499) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Windmill versions 1.276.0 through 1.603.2 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the folder management API endpoints. The endpoints for creating, deleting, and managing folder ownership do not enforce role-based access control for operator-level users. In Windmill, operators are restricted users intended to only execute existing scripts, but due to missing server-side authorization checks, operators can create folders, manage folder permissions, and access owner management endpoints. This bypass serves as the prerequisite for exploiting CVE-2026-23696 (SQL injection via folder addowner) enabling full privilege escalation from operator to super admin with remote code execution.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-22683

参考链接:

Windmill < 1.603.3 - Operator Authorization Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-22683
  • CVE: CVE-2026-22683 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.00678 (percentile 0.48499) @ 2026-07-23

描述: Windmill versions 1.276.0 through 1.603.2 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the folder management API endpoints. The endpoints for creating, deleting, and managing folder ownership do not enforce role-based access control for operator-level users. In Windmill, operators are restricted users intended to only execute existing scripts, but due to missing server-side authorization checks, operators can create folders, manage folder permissions, and access owner management endpoints. This bypass serves as the prerequisite for exploiting CVE-2026-23696 (SQL injection via folder addowner) enabling full privilege escalation from operator to super admin with remote code execution.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-22683

参考链接:

Ruby Kernel#open/URI.open RCE

  • 漏洞ID: cmdi-ruby-open-rce
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Ruby's Kernel#open and URI.open enables not only file access but also process invocation by prefixing a pipe symbol (e.g., open(“| ls”)). So, it may lead to Remote Code Execution by using variable input to the argument of Kernel#open and URI.open.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Blind OS Command Injection

  • 漏洞ID: cmdi-blind-oast-polyglot
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Potential blind OS command injection vulnerabilities, where the application constructs OS commands using unsanitized user input. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary command execution on the system.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Python Code Injection

  • 漏洞ID: python-code-injection
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: 暂无描述

攻击向量: 网络扫描

XInclude Injection - Detection

  • 漏洞ID: xinclude-injection
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: XInclude is a part of the XML specification that allows an XML document to be built from sub-documents. You can place an XInclude attack within any data value in an XML document, so the attack can be performed in situations where you only control a single item of data that is placed into a server-side XML document.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

LFI Detection - Keyed

  • 漏洞ID: lfi-keyed
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: 暂无描述

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产EPSS风险评分
Arelle < 2.39.10 - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00735/5
Directus - Unauthenticated File Modification🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00475/5
Dockwatch <= 0.6.567 - OS Command Injectio🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.01195/5
Windmill < 1.603.3 - SQL Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.05065/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02805/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.19515/5
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.30725/5
Arelle < 2.39.10 - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00735/5
Directus - Unauthenticated File Modification🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00475/5
Dockwatch <= 0.6.567 - OS Command Injectio🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.01195/5
Directus - Unauthenticated File Modification🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00475/5
Directus - Unauthenticated File Modification🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.00475/5
Windmill < 1.603.3 - SQL Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.05065/5
Windmill < 1.603.3 - SQL Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.05065/5
Windmill < 1.603.3 - Operator Authorization Byp🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00684.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01534.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.03584.5/5
Windmill < 1.603.3 - Operator Authorization Byp🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00684.5/5
Windmill < 1.603.3 - Operator Authorization Byp🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.00684.5/5
Ruby Kernel#open/URI.open RCE🟠 high其他通用-4.5/5
Blind OS Command Injection🟠 high其他通用-4/5
Python Code Injection🟠 high其他通用-4/5
XInclude Injection - Detection🟠 high其他通用-4/5
LFI Detection - Keyed🟠 high其他通用-4/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01203.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01663.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01653.5/5
CSV Injection Detection🟡 medium其他通用-3/5
CRLF Injection🔵 low其他通用-2/5
Parameter based cookie injection⚪ info其他通用-1/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-42796.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-55746.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-58455.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-23696.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-42796.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-55746.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-58455.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-55746.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-55746.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-23696.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-23696.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-22683.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-22683.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-22683.yaml -t dast/vulnerabilities/cmdi/ruby-open-rce.yaml -t dast/vulnerabilities/cmdi/blind-oast-polyglots.yaml -t dast/vulnerabilities/cmdi/python-code-injection.yaml -t dast/vulnerabilities/injection/xinclude-injection.yaml -t dast/vulnerabilities/lfi/lfi-keyed.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-42796.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-55746.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-58455.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-23696.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-42796.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-55746.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-58455.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-55746.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-55746.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-23696.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-23696.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-22683.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-22683.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-22683.yaml -t dast/vulnerabilities/cmdi/ruby-open-rce.yaml -t dast/vulnerabilities/cmdi/blind-oast-polyglots.yaml -t dast/vulnerabilities/cmdi/python-code-injection.yaml -t dast/vulnerabilities/injection/xinclude-injection.yaml -t dast/vulnerabilities/lfi/lfi-keyed.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t dast/vulnerabilities/injection/csv-injection.yaml -t dast/vulnerabilities/crlf/crlf-injection.yaml -t dast/vulnerabilities/crlf/cookie-injection.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-23
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-23

4 个共同标签

从 613 个模板更新中精选分析 28 个高价值 POC，发现 20 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-22

4 个共同标签

从 615 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 23 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-21

4 个共同标签

从 626 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 24 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-20

4 个共同标签

从 300 个模板更新中精选分析 7 个高价值 POC，发现 4 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-19

4 个共同标签

从 603 个模板更新中精选分析 20 个高价值 POC，发现 14 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章