Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-01

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描威胁情报

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-07-01

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 970 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 940 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 12 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(19), 配置错误(2), 子域接管(2), 其他(3), 技术识别(4)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 8 个
  • 🟠 高危: 4 个
  • 🟡 中危: 11 个
  • ⚪ 信息: 7 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02803 (percentile 0.84701) @ 2026-06-30

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

LiteLLM - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-42208
  • CVE: CVE-2026-42208 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.84518 (percentile 0.9967) @ 2026-06-30

描述: LiteLLM 1.81.16 to < 1.83.7 contains a SQL injection caused by improper handling of caller-supplied key in database query during proxy API key checks, letting unauthenticated attackers read and modify database data, exploit requires crafted Authorization header.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-42208

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02803 (percentile 0.84701) @ 2026-06-30

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

LiteLLM - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-42208
  • CVE: CVE-2026-42208 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.84518 (percentile 0.9967) @ 2026-06-30

描述: LiteLLM 1.81.16 to < 1.83.7 contains a SQL injection caused by improper handling of caller-supplied key in database query during proxy API key checks, letting unauthenticated attackers read and modify database data, exploit requires crafted Authorization header.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-42208

参考链接:

LiteLLM - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-42208
  • CVE: CVE-2026-42208 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.84518 (percentile 0.9967) @ 2026-06-30

描述: LiteLLM 1.81.16 to < 1.83.7 contains a SQL injection caused by improper handling of caller-supplied key in database query during proxy API key checks, letting unauthenticated attackers read and modify database data, exploit requires crafted Authorization header.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-42208

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.02803 (percentile 0.84701) @ 2026-06-30

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Spring Boot Actuator - Heap Dump Detection

  • 漏洞ID: springboot-heapdump
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A Spring Boot Actuator heap dump was detected. A heap dump is a snapshot of JVM memory, which could expose environment variables and HTTP requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Spring Boot Actuator - Heap Dump Detection

  • 漏洞ID: springboot-heapdump
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A Spring Boot Actuator heap dump was detected. A heap dump is a snapshot of JVM memory, which could expose environment variables and HTTP requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01531 (percentile 0.71606) @ 2026-06-30

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.87948) @ 2026-06-30

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6984
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6984 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.01531 (percentile 0.71606) @ 2026-06-30

描述: langchain-ai/langchain 0.3.63 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection caused by insecure XML parsing in EverNoteLoader using etree.iterparse(), letting attackers disclose sensitive information, exploit requires crafted malicious XML payload.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6984

参考链接:

UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-10795
  • CVE: CVE-2026-10795 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.03578 (percentile 0.87948) @ 2026-06-30

描述: UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin for WordPress <= 1.26.4 contains an authentication bypass caused by insufficient validation in UpdraftPlus_Remote_Communications_V2::wp_loaded, letting unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary RPC commands as admin, exploit requires no authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-10795

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产EPSS风险评分
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02805/5
LiteLLM - SQL Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.84525/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02805/5
LiteLLM - SQL Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.84525/5
LiteLLM - SQL Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.84525/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.02805/5
Spring Boot Actuator - Heap Dump Detection🔴 critical配置错误通用-5/5
Spring Boot Actuator - Heap Dump Detection🔴 critical配置错误通用-5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01534.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.03584.5/5
langchain-ai langchain - XML External Entity Injec🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.01534.5/5
UpdraftPlus WP Backup & Migration Plugin - Authent🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.03584.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01163.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01643.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01653.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01163.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01643.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01653.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01163.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01643.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.01653.5/5
GoDaddy Parked Domain - Subdomain Takeover🟡 medium子域接管通用-3/5
GoDaddy Parked Domain - Subdomain Takeover🟡 medium子域接管通用-3/5
Public DNS Resolving to Private IP Addresses⚪ info其他通用-1/5
ASP.NET Framework Exceptions⚪ info其他通用-1/5
Node.js Framework Exceptions⚪ info其他通用-1/5
Wix Detection⚪ info技术识别通用-1/5
BigCommerce Detection⚪ info技术识别通用-1/5
Bitrix Detection⚪ info技术识别通用-1/5
Blogger Detection⚪ info技术识别通用-1/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-42208.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-42208.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-42208.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t http/misconfiguration/springboot/springboot-heapdump.yaml -t http/misconfiguration/springboot/springboot-heapdump.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-42208.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-42208.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-42208.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t http/misconfiguration/springboot/springboot-heapdump.yaml -t http/misconfiguration/springboot/springboot-heapdump.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6984.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-10795.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/takeovers/godaddy-parked-domain.yaml -t http/takeovers/godaddy-parked-domain.yaml -t dns/dns-internal-ip-disclosure.yaml -t file/logs/aspnet-framework-exceptions.yaml -t file/logs/nodejs-framework-exceptions.yaml -t http/technologies/Wix-detect.yaml -t http/technologies/bigcommerce-detect.yaml -t http/technologies/bitrix-detect.yaml -t http/technologies/blogger-detect.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-06-30
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-06-30

4 个共同标签

从 630 个模板更新中精选分析 29 个高价值 POC，发现 9 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-06-29

4 个共同标签

从 671 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 15 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-06-28

4 个共同标签

从 301 个模板更新中精选分析 11 个高价值 POC，发现 8 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-06-27

4 个共同标签

从 622 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 14 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-06-26

4 个共同标签

从 648 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 22 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章