Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-03-13

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描威胁情报

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-03-13

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 431 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 401 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 20 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(16), 其他(8), 技术识别(6)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 8 个
  • 🟠 高危: 12 个
  • 🟡 中危: 2 个
  • ⚪ 信息: 8 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

WordPress User Registration & Membership <= 5.1.2 - Unauthenticated Privilege Escalation

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-1492
  • CVE: CVE-2026-1492 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00097 (percentile 0.26744) @ 2026-03-12

描述: User Registration & Membership WordPress plugin <= 5.1.2 contains an improper privilege management vulnerability caused by accepting user-supplied roles without server-side allowlist enforcement, letting unauthenticated attackers create administrator accounts

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-1492

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.04785 (percentile 0.89314) @ 2026-03-12

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Ivanti Connect Secure - Stack-based Buffer Overflow

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-22457
  • CVE: CVE-2025-22457 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.53659 (percentile 0.9795) @ 2026-03-12

描述: Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.6, Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.4, and Ivanti ZTA Gateways before version 22.8R2.2 contain a stack-based buffer overflow caused by improper input handling, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code without authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-22457

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.13848 (percentile 0.94176) @ 2026-03-12

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
  • CVE: CVE-2025-6216 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.25424 (percentile 0.96123) @ 2026-03-12

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.07497 (percentile 0.91661) @ 2026-03-12

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

GNU Inetutils telnetd - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-24061
  • CVE: CVE-2026-24061 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.75268 (percentile 0.98859) @ 2026-03-12

描述: GNU Inetutils telnetd through 2.7 contains an authentication bypass caused by setting the USER environment variable to &quot;-f root&quot;, letting remote attackers bypass authentication, exploit requires remote access to telnetd service.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-24061

参考链接:

WordPress User Registration & Membership <= 5.1.2 - Unauthenticated Privilege Escalation

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-1492
  • CVE: CVE-2026-1492 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00097 (percentile 0.26744) @ 2026-03-12

描述: User Registration & Membership WordPress plugin <= 5.1.2 contains an improper privilege management vulnerability caused by accepting user-supplied roles without server-side allowlist enforcement, letting unauthenticated attackers create administrator accounts

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-1492

参考链接:

MongoDB Server - Information Disclosure (MongoBleed)

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-14847
  • CVE: CVE-2025-14847 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.71202 (percentile 0.98689) @ 2026-03-12

描述: MongoDB Server contained a flaw in the zlib decompression logic where mismatched length fields in compressed protocol headers allowed a read of uninitialized heap memory by an unauthenticated client.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-14847

参考链接:

MongoDB Server - Information Disclosure (MongoBleed)

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-14847
  • CVE: CVE-2025-14847 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.71202 (percentile 0.98689) @ 2026-03-12

描述: MongoDB Server contained a flaw in the zlib decompression logic where mismatched length fields in compressed protocol headers allowed a read of uninitialized heap memory by an unauthenticated client.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-14847

参考链接:

MongoDB Server - Information Disclosure (MongoBleed)

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-14847
  • CVE: CVE-2025-14847 (2025)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个
  • EPSS: 0.71202 (percentile 0.98689) @ 2026-03-12

描述: MongoDB Server contained a flaw in the zlib decompression logic where mismatched length fields in compressed protocol headers allowed a read of uninitialized heap memory by an unauthenticated client.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-14847

参考链接:

Ally – Web Accessibility & Usability <= 4.0.3 - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-2413
  • CVE: CVE-2026-2413 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00076 (percentile 0.22627) @ 2026-03-12

描述: The Ally – Web Accessibility & Usability plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the URL path in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.3. This is due to insufficient escaping on the user-supplied URL parameter in the get_global_remediations() method, where it is directly concatenated into an SQL JOIN clause without proper sanitization for SQL context. While esc_url_raw() is applied for URL safety, it does not prevent SQL metacharacters (single quotes, parentheses) from being injected. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database via time-based blind SQL injection techniques. The Remediation module must be active, which requires the plugin to be connected to an Elementor account.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-2413

参考链接:

Ally – Web Accessibility & Usability <= 4.0.3 - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-2413
  • CVE: CVE-2026-2413 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00076 (percentile 0.22627) @ 2026-03-12

描述: The Ally – Web Accessibility & Usability plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the URL path in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.3. This is due to insufficient escaping on the user-supplied URL parameter in the get_global_remediations() method, where it is directly concatenated into an SQL JOIN clause without proper sanitization for SQL context. While esc_url_raw() is applied for URL safety, it does not prevent SQL metacharacters (single quotes, parentheses) from being injected. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database via time-based blind SQL injection techniques. The Remediation module must be active, which requires the plugin to be connected to an Elementor account.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-2413

参考链接:

Ally – Web Accessibility & Usability <= 4.0.3 - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-2413
  • CVE: CVE-2026-2413 (2026)
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个
  • EPSS: 0.00076 (percentile 0.22627) @ 2026-03-12

描述: The Ally – Web Accessibility & Usability plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the URL path in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.3. This is due to insufficient escaping on the user-supplied URL parameter in the get_global_remediations() method, where it is directly concatenated into an SQL JOIN clause without proper sanitization for SQL context. While esc_url_raw() is applied for URL safety, it does not prevent SQL metacharacters (single quotes, parentheses) from being injected. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database via time-based blind SQL injection techniques. The Remediation module must be active, which requires the plugin to be connected to an Elementor account.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-2413

参考链接:

UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read

  • 漏洞ID: yonyou-nc-lfi
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: UFIDA NC is vulnerable to an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the nc.uap.lfw.file.action.DocServlet component. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw to read sensitive files on the server by sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read

  • 漏洞ID: yonyou-nc-lfi
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: UFIDA NC is vulnerable to an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the nc.uap.lfw.file.action.DocServlet component. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw to read sensitive files on the server by sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read

  • 漏洞ID: yonyou-nc-lfi
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: UFIDA NC is vulnerable to an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the nc.uap.lfw.file.action.DocServlet component. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw to read sensitive files on the server by sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read

  • 漏洞ID: yonyou-nc-lfi
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: UFIDA NC is vulnerable to an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the nc.uap.lfw.file.action.DocServlet component. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw to read sensitive files on the server by sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read

  • 漏洞ID: yonyou-nc-lfi
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: UFIDA NC is vulnerable to an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the nc.uap.lfw.file.action.DocServlet component. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw to read sensitive files on the server by sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read

  • 漏洞ID: yonyou-nc-lfi
  • CVE: -
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: UFIDA NC is vulnerable to an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the nc.uap.lfw.file.action.DocServlet component. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw to read sensitive files on the server by sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产EPSS风险评分
WordPress User Registration & Membership <&#x3D🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00105/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.04785/5
Ivanti Connect Secure - Stack-based Buffer Overflo🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.53665/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台0.13855/5
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.25425/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.07505/5
GNU Inetutils telnetd - Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用0.75275/5
WordPress User Registration & Membership <&#x3D🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00105/5
MongoDB Server - Information Disclosure (MongoBlee🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.71205/5
MongoDB Server - Information Disclosure (MongoBlee🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.71205/5
MongoDB Server - Information Disclosure (MongoBlee🟠 highCVE漏洞通用0.71205/5
Ally – Web Accessibility & Usability <= 4.🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00084.5/5
Ally – Web Accessibility & Usability <= 4.🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00084.5/5
Ally – Web Accessibility & Usability <= 4.🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点0.00084.5/5
UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read🟠 high其他通用-4/5
UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read🟠 high其他通用-4/5
UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read🟠 high其他通用-4/5
UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read🟠 high其他通用-4/5
UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read🟠 high其他通用-4/5
UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read🟠 high其他通用-4/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.02413.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用0.00513.5/5
YPAREO Panel - Detect⚪ info其他管理面板-1/5
YPAREO Panel - Detect⚪ info其他管理面板-1/5
Wix Detection⚪ info技术识别通用-1/5
BigCommerce Detection⚪ info技术识别通用-1/5
Bitrix Detection⚪ info技术识别通用-1/5
Blogger Detection⚪ info技术识别通用-1/5
Concrete5 Detection⚪ info技术识别通用-1/5
Django Detection⚪ info技术识别通用-1/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-1492.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22457.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-24061.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-1492.yaml -t javascript/cves/2025/CVE-2025-14847.yaml -t javascript/cves/2025/CVE-2025-14847.yaml -t javascript/cves/2025/CVE-2025-14847.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-2413.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-2413.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-2413.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-1492.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22457.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2026/CVE-2026-24061.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-1492.yaml -t javascript/cves/2025/CVE-2025-14847.yaml -t javascript/cves/2025/CVE-2025-14847.yaml -t javascript/cves/2025/CVE-2025-14847.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-2413.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-2413.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-2413.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/exposed-panels/ypareo-panel.yaml -t http/exposed-panels/ypareo-panel.yaml -t http/technologies/Wix-detect.yaml -t http/technologies/bigcommerce-detect.yaml -t http/technologies/bitrix-detect.yaml -t http/technologies/blogger-detect.yaml -t http/technologies/concrete5-detect.yaml -t http/technologies/django-detect.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-03-12
下一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-03-14
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-03-14

4 个共同标签

从 969 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 22 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-03-12

4 个共同标签

从 731 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 26 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-03-11

4 个共同标签

从 926 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 26 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-03-10

4 个共同标签

从 649 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 16 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-03-09

4 个共同标签

从 623 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 11 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章