Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-02-04

📊 智能筛选概况

• 发现变更: 340 个模板更新
• 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
• 智能跳过: 310 个低优先级模板
• 高风险漏洞: 21 个
• 主要类别: CVE漏洞(14), 其他(13), 信息泄露(2), 技术识别(1)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

• 🔴 严重: 10 个
• 🟠 高危: 11 个
• 🟡 中危: 2 个
• 🔵 低危: 3 个
• ⚪ 信息: 4 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
• CVE: CVE-2025-1550 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.04785 (percentile 0.89258) @ 2026-02-03

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Ivanti Connect Secure - Stack-based Buffer Overflow

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-22457
• CVE: CVE-2025-22457 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.55523 (percentile 0.98021) @ 2026-02-03

描述: Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.6, Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.4, and Ivanti ZTA Gateways before version 22.8R2.2 contain a stack-based buffer overflow caused by improper input handling, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code without authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-22457

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
• CVE: CVE-2025-25291 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: GitLab 平台
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.13848 (percentile 0.94154) @ 2026-02-03

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32433
• CVE: CVE-2025-32433 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.47695 (percentile 0.97635) @ 2026-02-03

描述: Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11, and OTP-25.3.2.20, a SSH server may allow an attacker to perform unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in SSH protocol message handling, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems and execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32433

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-54309
• CVE: CVE-2025-54309 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.72177 (percentile 0.98721) @ 2026-02-03

描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
• CVE: CVE-2025-6216 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.31434 (percentile 0.96677) @ 2026-02-03

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
• CVE: CVE-2025-68926 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.07206 (percentile 0.9143) @ 2026-02-03

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-9242
• CVE: CVE-2025-9242 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.60074 (percentile 0.98226) @ 2026-02-03

描述: WatchGuard Fireware OS 11.10.2 to 11.12.4_Update1, 12.0 to 12.11.3, and 2025.1 contains an out-of-bounds write caused by improper handling in Mobile User VPN and Branch Office VPN with IKEv2 dynamic gateway peer, letting remote unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-9242

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Eclipse Theia IDE - LFI to RCE

• 漏洞ID: theia-lfi-to-rce
• CVE: -
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Detected Eclipse Theia IDE was exposed without authentication, allowing unauthenticated attackers to access the web-based IDE with terminal capabilities, file system access, and arbitrary command execution.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料

Eclipse Theia IDE - LFI to RCE

• 漏洞ID: theia-lfi-to-rce
• CVE: -
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Detected Eclipse Theia IDE was exposed without authentication, allowing unauthenticated attackers to access the web-based IDE with terminal capabilities, file system access, and arbitrary command execution.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料

OpenCode < 1.0.216 - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-22812
• CVE: CVE-2026-22812 (2026)
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.00021 (percentile 0.04653) @ 2026-02-03

描述: OpenCode versions prior to 1.0.216 contain an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability. The application exposes session and shell execution endpoints without proper authentication, allowing remote attackers to create sessions and execute arbitrary shell commands on the underlying server.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-22812

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

OpenCode < 1.0.216 - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2026-22812
• CVE: CVE-2026-22812 (2026)
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个
• EPSS: 0.00021 (percentile 0.04653) @ 2026-02-03

描述: OpenCode versions prior to 1.0.216 contain an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability. The application exposes session and shell execution endpoints without proper authentication, allowing remote attackers to create sessions and execute arbitrary shell commands on the underlying server.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2026-22812

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

WordPress WPvivid Backup & Migration Plugin <= 0.9.116 - Authenticated Arbitrary File Upload

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-5961
• CVE: CVE-2025-5961 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: WordPress 站点
• 预估影响: 数千万个
• EPSS: 0.02035 (percentile 0.83494) @ 2026-02-03

描述: The Migration, Backup, Staging – WPvivid Backup & Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the 'wpvivid_upload_import_files' function in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.116.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-5961

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

WordPress WPvivid Backup & Migration Plugin <= 0.9.116 - Authenticated Arbitrary File Upload

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-5961
• CVE: CVE-2025-5961 (2025)
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: WordPress 站点
• 预估影响: 数千万个
• EPSS: 0.02035 (percentile 0.83494) @ 2026-02-03

描述: The Migration, Backup, Staging – WPvivid Backup & Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the 'wpvivid_upload_import_files' function in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.116.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-5961

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read

• 漏洞ID: yonyou-nc-lfi
• CVE: -
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: UFIDA NC is vulnerable to an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the nc.uap.lfw.file.action.DocServlet component. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw to read sensitive files on the server by sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料

UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read

• 漏洞ID: yonyou-nc-lfi
• CVE: -
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: UFIDA NC is vulnerable to an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the nc.uap.lfw.file.action.DocServlet component. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw to read sensitive files on the server by sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料

UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read

• 漏洞ID: yonyou-nc-lfi
• CVE: -
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: UFIDA NC is vulnerable to an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the nc.uap.lfw.file.action.DocServlet component. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw to read sensitive files on the server by sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料

UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read

• 漏洞ID: yonyou-nc-lfi
• CVE: -
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: UFIDA NC is vulnerable to an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the nc.uap.lfw.file.action.DocServlet component. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw to read sensitive files on the server by sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料

UFIDA NC - Arbitrary File Read

• 漏洞ID: yonyou-nc-lfi
• CVE: -
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: UFIDA NC is vulnerable to an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the nc.uap.lfw.file.action.DocServlet component. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw to read sensitive files on the server by sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料

ClusterRoles with Risky nodes/proxy GET Permission

• 漏洞ID: k8s-clusterrole-nodes-proxy-rce
• CVE: -
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
• 影响资产: Kubernetes 集群
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Detects Kubernetes ClusterRoles that grant GET permission on nodes/proxy resource. Due to an authorization inconsistency in Kubelet, the nodes/proxy GET permission allows execution of commands in any container via WebSocket connections to the Kubelet API. The Kubelet authorizes based on the initial HTTP GET method of WebSocket handshake rather than the actual operation (exec/run/attach) which should require CREATE permission.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料

RustDesk Web Client - Default login

• 漏洞ID: rustdesk-webclient-default-login
• CVE: -
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Detected RustDesk Web Client Admin Console was using default credentials.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

📋 完整模板列表

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22457.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/other/theia-lfi-to-rce.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/other/theia-lfi-to-rce.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-22812.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-22812.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-5961.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-5961.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t cloud/kubernetes/rbac/k8s-clusterrole-nodes-proxy-rce.yaml -t http/default-logins/rustdesk-webclient-default-login.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22457.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/other/theia-lfi-to-rce.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/other/theia-lfi-to-rce.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-22812.yaml -t http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-22812.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-5961.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-5961.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t http/vulnerabilities/yonyou/yonyou-nc-lfi.yaml -t cloud/kubernetes/rbac/k8s-clusterrole-nodes-proxy-rce.yaml -t http/default-logins/rustdesk-webclient-default-login.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/exposures/logs/wp-wps-hide-login-log.yaml -t http/exposures/logs/wp-wps-hide-login-log.yaml -t network/detection/unauth-java-message-broker-detect.yaml -t http/technologies/semantic-ui-detect.yaml -t dns/acme-challenge-detect.yaml -t file/logs/aspnet-framework-exceptions.yaml -t file/logs/nodejs-framework-exceptions.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试