Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-08

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描威胁情报

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-08

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 933 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 903 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 17 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 7 个
  • 🟠 高危: 9 个
  • 🟡 中危: 14 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

InvoiceShelf <= 1.3.0 - PHP Deserialization

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-55556
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: InvoiceShelf version 1.3.0 and below contains an unauthenticated PHP deserialization vulnerability that can lead to remote code execution. An attacker with knowledge of the APP_KEY can achieve remote command execution on the server through Laravel's cookie deserialization. While the vulnerability is severe, it is partially mitigated in default installations as the APP_KEY is regenerated during setup.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-55556

参考链接:

GitHub Enterprise - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-9487
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed SAML SSO authentication to be bypassed resulting in unauthorized provisioning of users and access to the instance. Exploitation required the encrypted assertions feature to be enabled, and the attacker would require direct network access as well as a signed SAML response or metadata document. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.15 and was fixed in versions 3.11.16, 3.12.10, 3.13.5, and 3.14.2. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32433
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11, and OTP-25.3.2.20, a SSH server may allow an attacker to perform unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in SSH protocol message handling, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems and execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32433

参考链接:

CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-54309
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309

参考链接:

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authentication Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-68926
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: RustFS before 1.0.0-alpha.77 used a hardcoded gRPC authentication token "rustfs rpc" that could not be changed without recompiling and this allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to gain full administrative access to the gRPC API.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-68926

参考链接:

Django QuerySet.order_by - SQL Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2021-35042
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 contain a SQL injection caused by untrusted input in QuerySet.order_by. Attackers can execute arbitrary SQL commands if they control order_by input parameters.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2021-35042

参考链接:

Apache OFBiz - XML External Entity Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2011-3600
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: Apache 服务器
  • 预估影响: 数百万台

描述: The /webtools/control/xmlrpc endpoint in OFBiz XML-RPC event handler is exposed to External Entity Injection by passing DOCTYPE declarations with executable payloads that discloses the contents of files in the filesystem. In addition, it can also be used to probe for open network ports, and figure out from returned error messages whether a file exists or not. This affects OFBiz 16.11.01 to 16.11.04.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2011-3600

参考链接:

Looney Tunables Linux - Local Privilege Escalation

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-4911
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A buffer overflow was discovered in the GNU C Library's dynamic loader ld.so while processing the GLIBC_TUNABLES environment variable. This issue could allow a local attacker to use maliciously crafted GLIBC_TUNABLES environment variables when launching binaries with SUID permission to execute code with elevated privileges.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-4911

参考链接:

glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-6246
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the __vsyslog_internal function of the glibc library. This function is called by the syslog and vsyslog functions. This issue occurs when the openlog function was not called, or called with the ident argument set to NULL, and the program name (the basename of argv[0]) is bigger than 1024 bytes, resulting in an application crash or local privilege escalation. This issue affects glibc 2.36 and newer.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-6246

参考链接:

HTTP API DOM - XSS on JSONP callback

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-29882
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: SRS is a simple, high-efficiency, real-time video server. SRS's /api/v1/vhosts/vid-&lt;id&gt;?callback&#x3D;&lt;payload&gt; endpoint didn't filter the callback function name which led to injecting malicious javascript payloads and executing XSS ( Cross-Site Scripting). This vulnerability is fixed in 5.0.210 and 6.0.121.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-29882

参考链接:

SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 - Cross-Site Scripting

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2002-1131
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Virtual Keyboard plugin for SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 is prone to a cross-site scripting vulnerability because it fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2002-1131

参考链接:

Squirrelmail <=1.4.6 - Local File Inclusion

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2006-2842
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: SquirrelMail 1.4.6 and earlier versions are susceptible to a PHP local file inclusion vulnerability in functions/plugin.php if register_globals is enabled and magic_quotes_gpc is disabled. This allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the plugins array parameter.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2006-2842

参考链接:

WordPress Sniplets 1.1.2 - Local File Inclusion

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2008-1059
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个

描述: PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in modules/syntax_highlight.php in the Sniplets 1.1.2 and 1.2.2 plugin for WordPress allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the libpath parameter.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2008-1059

参考链接:

WPS Hide Login <= 1.5.2.2 - Login Page Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2019-15823
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个

描述: WPS-Hide-Login plugin before 1.5.3 for WordPress contains an action=confirmaction protection bypass, letting attackers bypass security checks, exploit requires sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

WPS Hide Login <= 1.5.2.2 - Login Page Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2019-15823
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个

描述: WPS-Hide-Login plugin before 1.5.3 for WordPress contains an action=confirmaction protection bypass, letting attackers bypass security checks, exploit requires sending crafted requests.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Apache Tomcat 4.x-7.x - Cross-Site Scripting

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2007-2449
  • 严重程度: 🟡 MEDIUM
  • 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
  • 影响资产: Apache 服务器
  • 预估影响: 数百万台

描述: Apache Tomcat 4.x through 7.x contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability which an attacker can use to execute arbitrary script in the browser of an unsuspecting user in the context of the affected site.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产风险评分
InvoiceShelf <= 1.3.0 - PHP Deserializatio🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
GitHub Enterprise - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
RustFS < 1.0.0-alpha.77 - Hardcoded gRPC Authen🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Django QuerySet.order_by - SQL Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Apache OFBiz - XML External Entity Injection🟠 highCVE漏洞Apache 服务器4.5/5
Looney Tunables Linux - Local Privilege Escalation🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
HTTP API DOM - XSS on JSONP callback🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 - Cross-Site Scripting🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
Squirrelmail <=1.4.6 - Local File Inclusio🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
WordPress Sniplets 1.1.2 - Local File Inclusion🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点4.5/5
WPS Hide Login <= 1.5.2.2 - Login Page By🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点4/5
WPS Hide Login <= 1.5.2.2 - Login Page By🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点4/5
Apache Tomcat 4.x-7.x - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞Apache 服务器4/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Microsoft FrontPage Extensions - Information Discl🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
SquirrelMail 1.4.x - Folder Name Cross-Site Script🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Open Bulletin Board (OpenBB) v1.0.6 - Open Redirec🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
SquirrelMail Address Add 1.4.2 - Cross-Site Script🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
SAP Web Application Server 6.x/7.0 - Open Redirect🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Cofax <=2.0RC3 - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Cherokee HTTPD <=0.5 - Cross-Site Scriptin🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Joomla! RSfiles <=1.0.2 - Local File Inclu🟡 mediumCVE漏洞Joomla 站点3.5/5
OpenSymphony XWork/Apache Struts2 - Remote Code Ex🟡 mediumCVE漏洞Apache 服务器3.5/5
phpPgAdmin <=4.1.1 - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
WordPress Sniplets <=1.2.2 - Cross-Site Sc🟡 mediumCVE漏洞WordPress 站点3.5/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-55556.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t dast/cves/2021/CVE-2021-35042.yaml -t http/cves/2011/CVE-2011-3600.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-4911.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t http/cves/2002/CVE-2002-1131.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-2842.yaml -t http/cves/2008/CVE-2008-1059.yaml -t http/cves/2019/CVE-2019-15823.yaml -t http/cves/2019/CVE-2019-15823.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-2449.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-55556.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-68926.yaml -t dast/cves/2021/CVE-2021-35042.yaml -t http/cves/2011/CVE-2011-3600.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-4911.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t http/cves/2002/CVE-2002-1131.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-2842.yaml -t http/cves/2008/CVE-2008-1059.yaml -t http/cves/2019/CVE-2019-15823.yaml -t http/cves/2019/CVE-2019-15823.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-2449.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/cves/2000/CVE-2000-0114.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-0519.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-1965.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3128.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3634.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-4385.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-1681.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-4504.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-4556.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-5728.yaml -t http/cves/2008/CVE-2008-1061.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-07
下一篇文章
用 Nuclei 和 GitHub Actions，给博客搞了个全自动漏洞情报站
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-15

4 个共同标签

从 344 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 18 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-14

4 个共同标签

从 339 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 14 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-13

4 个共同标签

从 344 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 16 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-12

4 个共同标签

从 340 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 19 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-11

4 个共同标签

从 628 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 20 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章