Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-04
📊 智能筛选概况
- 发现变更: 619 个模板更新
- 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
- 智能跳过: 589 个低优先级模板
- 高风险漏洞: 16 个
- 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)
💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板,跳过低价值的技术识别类模板,确保高效利用 API 资源。
严重程度分布
- 🔴 严重: 7 个
- 🟠 高危: 8 个
- 🟡 中危: 15 个
🔍 重点漏洞分析
Langflow AI <= 1.6.9 - CORS Misconfiguration
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-34291 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Langflow AI versions 1.6.9 and earlier are vulnerable to a CORS misconfiguration that allows any origin to make credentialed requests. Combined with SameSite=None cookies, this enables cross-origin token theft and subsequent remote code execution via the /api/v1/validate/code endpoint.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-34291
参考链接:
GitHub Enterprise - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2024-9487 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed SAML SSO authentication to be bypassed resulting in unauthorized provisioning of users and access to the instance. Exploitation required the encrypted assertions feature to be enabled, and the attacker would require direct network access as well as a signed SAML response or metadata document. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.15 and was fixed in versions 3.11.16, 3.12.10, 3.13.5, and 3.14.2. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-1550 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-25291 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291
参考链接:
CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-54309 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309
参考链接:
Cisco IOS HTTP Configuration - Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2001-0537 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: HTTP server for Cisco IOS 11.3 to 12.2 allows attackers to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary commands, when local authorization is being used, by specifying a high access level in the URL.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2001-0537
参考链接:
Horde Groupware Unauthenticated Admin Access
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2005-3344 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Horde Groupware contains an administrative account with a blank password, which allows remote attackers to gain access.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2005-3344
参考链接:
WCFM Membership <= 2.10.0 - Broken Access Control
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2022-4940 - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: WordPress 站点
- 预估影响: 数千万个
描述: The WCFM Membership plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification and access of data in versions up to, and including, 2.10.0 due to missing capability checks true the AJAX actions: wcfm-memberships, wcfm-memberships-manage, and wcfm-memberships-settings.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2022-4940
参考链接:
Sudo <= 1.8.27 - Security Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2019-14287 - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: In Sudo before 1.8.28, an attacker with access to a Runas ALL sudoer account can bypass certain policy blacklists and session PAM modules, and can cause incorrect logging, by invoking sudo with a crafted user ID. For example, this allows bypass of !root configuration, and USER= logging, for a "sudo -u #$((0xffffffff))" command.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2019-14287
参考链接:
Apache Tomcat WebSocket Frame Payload Length Validation Denial of Service
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2020-13935 - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56, and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104 contain a vulnerability in the WebSocket module where the payload length of WebSocket frames is not correctly validated. This can lead to an infinite loop when processing frames with invalid payload lengths. Attackers can exploit this flaw by sending multiple malicious requests, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) on the affected Tomcat instance.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2020-13935
参考链接:
Looney Tunables Linux - Local Privilege Escalation
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2023-4911 - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: A buffer overflow was discovered in the GNU C Library's dynamic loader ld.so while processing the GLIBC_TUNABLES environment variable. This issue could allow a local attacker to use maliciously crafted GLIBC_TUNABLES environment variables when launching binaries with SUID permission to execute code with elevated privileges.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2023-4911
参考链接:
glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2023-6246 - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the __vsyslog_internal function of the glibc library. This function is called by the syslog and vsyslog functions. This issue occurs when the openlog function was not called, or called with the ident argument set to NULL, and the program name (the basename of argv[0]) is bigger than 1024 bytes, resulting in an application crash or local privilege escalation. This issue affects glibc 2.36 and newer.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2023-6246
参考链接:
sqlparse - Denial of Service
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2024-4340 - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Passing a heavily nested list to sqlparse.parse() leads to a Denial of Service due to RecursionError.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2024-4340
参考链接:
PHP - LFR to Remote Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2024-2961 - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: PHP Local File Read vulnerability leading to Remote Code Execution
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2024-2961
参考链接:
Polyfill Supply Chain Attack Malicious Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2024-38526 - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: pdoc provides API Documentation for Python Projects. Documentation generated with pdoc --math linked to JavaScript files from polyfill.io
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2024-38526
参考链接:
Apache Tomcat 4.x-7.x - Cross-Site Scripting
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2007-2449 - 严重程度: 🟡 MEDIUM
- 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
- 影响资产: Apache 服务器
- 预估影响: 数百万台
描述: Apache Tomcat 4.x through 7.x contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability which an attacker can use to execute arbitrary script in the browser of an unsuspecting user in the context of the affected site.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
📋 完整模板列表
| 模板名称 | 严重程度 | 类别 | 影响资产 | 风险评分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Langflow AI <= 1.6.9 - CORS Misconfigurati | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 5/5 |
| GitHub Enterprise - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 5/5 |
| Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 5/5 |
| GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 5/5 |
| CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 5/5 |
| Cisco IOS HTTP Configuration - Authentication Bypa | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 5/5 |
| Horde Groupware Unauthenticated Admin Access | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 5/5 |
| WCFM Membership <= 2.10.0 - Broken Access | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 4.5/5 |
| Sudo <= 1.8.27 - Security Bypass | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 4.5/5 |
| Apache Tomcat WebSocket Frame Payload Length Valid | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 4.5/5 |
| Looney Tunables Linux - Local Privilege Escalation | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 4.5/5 |
| glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 4.5/5 |
| sqlparse - Denial of Service | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 4.5/5 |
| PHP - LFR to Remote Code Execution | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 4.5/5 |
| Polyfill Supply Chain Attack Malicious Code Execut | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 4.5/5 |
| Apache Tomcat 4.x-7.x - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | Apache 服务器 | 4/5 |
| Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Microsoft FrontPage Extensions - Information Discl | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| SquirrelMail 1.4.x - Folder Name Cross-Site Script | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Open Bulletin Board (OpenBB) v1.0.6 - Open Redirec | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Lotus Domino R5 and R6 WebMail - Information Discl | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| SquirrelMail Address Add 1.4.2 - Cross-Site Script | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| SAP Web Application Server 6.x/7.0 - Open Redirect | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Cofax <=2.0RC3 - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Cherokee HTTPD <=0.5 - Cross-Site Scriptin | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Jira Rainbow.Zen - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Joomla! RSfiles <=1.0.2 - Local File Inclu | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | Joomla 站点 | 3.5/5 |
| OpenSymphony XWork/Apache Struts2 - Remote Code Ex | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | Apache 服务器 | 3.5/5 |
| phpPgAdmin <=4.1.1 - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
🛡️ 安全建议
🚨 发现高风险漏洞,建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞,及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞,优先处理
🔧 扫描建议
建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描:
# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-34291.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t http/cves/2001/CVE-2001-0537.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3344.yaml -t http/cves/2022/CVE-2022-4940.yaml -t code/cves/2019/CVE-2019-14287.yaml -t code/cves/2020/CVE-2020-13935.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-4911.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-4340.yaml -t dast/cves/2024/CVE-2024-2961.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-38526.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-2449.yaml -u target-url
# 扫描所有今日新增模板
nuclei -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-34291.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t http/cves/2001/CVE-2001-0537.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3344.yaml -t http/cves/2022/CVE-2022-4940.yaml -t code/cves/2019/CVE-2019-14287.yaml -t code/cves/2020/CVE-2020-13935.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-4911.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-4340.yaml -t dast/cves/2024/CVE-2024-2961.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-38526.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-2449.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/cves/2000/CVE-2000-0114.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-0519.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-1965.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-2428.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3128.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3634.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-4385.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-1681.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-0885.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-4504.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-4556.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-5728.yaml -u target-url
本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成,数据来源:ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates
扫描建议仅供参考,请在授权环境下进行安全测试