Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-12-30

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-12-30

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 340 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 310 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 17 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板,跳过低价值的技术识别类模板,确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 9 个
  • 🟠 高危: 8 个
  • 🟡 中危: 13 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-45409
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. Ruby-SAML in <= 12.2 and 1.13.0 <= 1.16.0 does not properly verify the signature of the SAML Response.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-45409

参考链接:


FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-47575
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A missing authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests to the fgfmd daemon. This vulnerability affects FortiManager versions 7.6.0, 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, 7.0.0 through 7.0.12, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, 6.2.0 through 6.2.12, and all versions of 6.0.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-47575

参考链接:


InvoiceShelf <= 1.3.0 - PHP Deserialization

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-55556
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: InvoiceShelf version 1.3.0 and below contains an unauthenticated PHP deserialization vulnerability that can lead to remote code execution. An attacker with knowledge of the APP_KEY can achieve remote command execution on the server through Laravel's cookie deserialization. While the vulnerability is severe, it is partially mitigated in default installations as the APP_KEY is regenerated during setup.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-55556

参考链接:


Uptime-Kuma - Local File Inclusion (LFI)

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-56331
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Uptime Kuma has an Improper URL Handling vulnerability that can be exploited through the "real-browser" feature. By providing a URL using the file:/// protocol (e.g., file:///etc/passwd), an attacker can obtain a screenshot of local sensitive files, because the user input is not validated by the server.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-56331

参考链接:


GitHub Enterprise - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-9487
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed SAML SSO authentication to be bypassed resulting in unauthorized provisioning of users and access to the instance. Exploitation required the encrypted assertions feature to be enabled, and the attacker would require direct network access as well as a signed SAML response or metadata document. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.15 and was fixed in versions 3.11.16, 3.12.10, 3.13.5, and 3.14.2. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:


Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:


Ivanti Connect Secure - Stack-based Buffer Overflow

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-22457
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.6, Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.4, and Ivanti ZTA Gateways before version 22.8R2.2 contain a stack-based buffer overflow caused by improper input handling, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code without authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-22457

参考链接:


Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32433
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11, and OTP-25.3.2.20, a SSH server may allow an attacker to perform unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in SSH protocol message handling, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems and execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32433

参考链接:


Horde Groupware Unauthenticated Admin Access

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2005-3344
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Horde Groupware contains an administrative account with a blank password, which allows remote attackers to gain access.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2005-3344

参考链接:


Social Auto Poster <= 5.3.14 - Stored Cross-Site Scripting

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-6753
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个

描述: Social Auto Poster plugin for WordPress versions up to 5.3.14 contains a stored cross-site scripting caused by insufficient sanitization and escaping of 'mapTypes' parameter in the 'wpw_auto_poster_map_wordpress_post_type' AJAX function, letting unauthenticated attackers inject and execute arbitrary scripts when users access affected pages.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-6753

参考链接:


Sudo <= 1.8.27 - Security Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2019-14287
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: In Sudo before 1.8.28, an attacker with access to a Runas ALL sudoer account can bypass certain policy blacklists and session PAM modules, and can cause incorrect logging, by invoking sudo with a crafted user ID. For example, this allows bypass of !root configuration, and USER= logging, for a "sudo -u #$((0xffffffff))" command.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2019-14287

参考链接:


glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-6246
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the __vsyslog_internal function of the glibc library. This function is called by the syslog and vsyslog functions. This issue occurs when the openlog function was not called, or called with the ident argument set to NULL, and the program name (the basename of argv[0]) is bigger than 1024 bytes, resulting in an application crash or local privilege escalation. This issue affects glibc 2.36 and newer.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-6246

参考链接:


HTTP API DOM - XSS on JSONP callback

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-29882
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: SRS is a simple, high-efficiency, real-time video server. SRS's /api/v1/vhosts/vid-&lt;id&gt;?callback&#x3D;&lt;payload&gt; endpoint didn't filter the callback function name which led to injecting malicious javascript payloads and executing XSS ( Cross-Site Scripting). This vulnerability is fixed in 5.0.210 and 6.0.121.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-29882

参考链接:


Polyfill Supply Chain Attack Malicious Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-38526
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: pdoc provides API Documentation for Python Projects. Documentation generated with pdoc --math linked to JavaScript files from polyfill.io

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-38526

参考链接:


SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 - Cross-Site Scripting

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2002-1131
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Virtual Keyboard plugin for SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 is prone to a cross-site scripting vulnerability because it fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2002-1131

参考链接:


Squirrelmail <=1.4.6 - Local File Inclusion

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2006-2842
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: SquirrelMail 1.4.6 and earlier versions are susceptible to a PHP local file inclusion vulnerability in functions/plugin.php if register_globals is enabled and magic_quotes_gpc is disabled. This allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the plugins array parameter.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2006-2842

参考链接:


MongoDB Server - Information Disclosure (MongoBleed)

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-14847
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Mismatched length fields in Zlib compressed protocol headers may allow a read of uninitialized heap memory by an unauthenticated client. This issue affects all MongoDB Server v7.0 prior to 7.0.28 versions, MongoDB Server v8.0 versions prior to 8.0.17, MongoDB Server v8.2 versions prior to 8.2.3, MongoDB Server v6.0 versions prior to 6.0.27, MongoDB Server v5.0 versions prior to 5.0.32, MongoDB Server v4.4 versions prior to 4.4.30, MongoDB Server v4.2 versions greater than or equal to 4.2.0, MongoDB Server v4.0 versions greater than or equal to 4.0.0, and MongoDB Server v3.6 versions greater than or equal to 3.6.0.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:


📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产风险评分
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台5/5
FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
InvoiceShelf <= 1.3.0 - PHP Deserializatio🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Uptime-Kuma - Local File Inclusion (LFI)🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
GitHub Enterprise - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Ivanti Connect Secure - Stack-based Buffer Overflo🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Horde Groupware Unauthenticated Admin Access🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Social Auto Poster <= 5.3.14 - Stored Cros🟠 highCVE漏洞WordPress 站点4.5/5
Sudo <= 1.8.27 - Security Bypass🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
HTTP API DOM - XSS on JSONP callback🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
Polyfill Supply Chain Attack Malicious Code Execut🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 - Cross-Site Scripting🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
Squirrelmail <=1.4.6 - Local File Inclusio🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
MongoDB Server - Information Disclosure (MongoBlee🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Microsoft FrontPage Extensions - Information Discl🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
SquirrelMail 1.4.x - Folder Name Cross-Site Script🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Open Bulletin Board (OpenBB) v1.0.6 - Open Redirec🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Lotus Domino R5 and R6 WebMail - Information Discl🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
SquirrelMail Address Add 1.4.2 - Cross-Site Script🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
SAP Web Application Server 6.x/7.0 - Open Redirect🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Cofax <=2.0RC3 - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Cherokee HTTPD <=0.5 - Cross-Site Scriptin🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Jira Rainbow.Zen - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Joomla! RSfiles <=1.0.2 - Local File Inclu🟡 mediumCVE漏洞Joomla 站点3.5/5
OpenSymphony XWork/Apache Struts2 - Remote Code Ex🟡 mediumCVE漏洞Apache 服务器3.5/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞,建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞,及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞,优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描:

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-45409.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-47575.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-55556.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-56331.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22457.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3344.yaml -t http/cves/2024/CVE-2024-6753.yaml -t code/cves/2019/CVE-2019-14287.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-38526.yaml -t http/cves/2002/CVE-2002-1131.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-2842.yaml -t javascript/cves/2025/CVE-2025-14847.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板  
nuclei -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-45409.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-47575.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-55556.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-56331.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22457.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3344.yaml -t http/cves/2024/CVE-2024-6753.yaml -t code/cves/2019/CVE-2019-14287.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-38526.yaml -t http/cves/2002/CVE-2002-1131.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-2842.yaml -t javascript/cves/2025/CVE-2025-14847.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/cves/2000/CVE-2000-0114.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-0519.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-1965.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-2428.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3128.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3634.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-4385.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-1681.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-0885.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-4504.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-4556.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成,数据来源:ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考,请在授权环境下进行安全测试

文章目录