Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-12-07

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-12-07

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 632 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 602 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 11 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 8 个
  • 🟠 高危: 3 个
  • 🟡 中危: 19 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

ZZZCMS ZZZPHP 1.6.3 – Remote PHP Code Execution (RCE)

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2019-10647
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: ZZZCMS zzzphp v1.6.3 contains a remote code execution caused by lack of restrictions in inc/zzz_file.php, letting attackers execute arbitrary PHP code via a crafted URL in the plugins/ueditor/php/controller.php?action=catchimage source[] parameter, exploit requires attacker to send malicious URL and server to serve PHP code as plain text.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2019-10647

参考链接:

FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-47575
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A missing authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests to the fgfmd daemon. This vulnerability affects FortiManager versions 7.6.0, 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, 7.0.0 through 7.0.12, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, 6.2.0 through 6.2.12, and all versions of 6.0.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-47575

参考链接:

Uptime-Kuma - Local File Inclusion (LFI)

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-56331
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Uptime Kuma has an Improper URL Handling vulnerability that can be exploited through the "real-browser" feature. By providing a URL using the file:/// protocol (e.g., file:///etc/passwd), an attacker can obtain a screenshot of local sensitive files, because the user input is not validated by the server.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-56331

参考链接:

GitHub Enterprise - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-9487
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed SAML SSO authentication to be bypassed resulting in unauthorized provisioning of users and access to the instance. Exploitation required the encrypted assertions feature to be enabled, and the attacker would require direct network access as well as a signed SAML response or metadata document. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.15 and was fixed in versions 3.11.16, 3.12.10, 3.13.5, and 3.14.2. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Apache Log4j2 - Remote Code Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2021-45046-DAST
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Apache Log4j2 Thread Context Lookup Pattern is vulnerable to remote code execution in certain non-default configurations.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2021-45046

参考链接:

Horde Groupware Unauthenticated Admin Access

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2005-3344
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Horde Groupware contains an administrative account with a blank password, which allows remote attackers to gain access.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2005-3344

参考链接:

HTTP API DOM - XSS on JSONP callback

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-29882
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: SRS is a simple, high-efficiency, real-time video server. SRS's /api/v1/vhosts/vid-<id>?callback=<payload> endpoint didn't filter the callback function name which led to injecting malicious javascript payloads and executing XSS ( Cross-Site Scripting). This vulnerability is fixed in 5.0.210 and 6.0.121.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-29882

参考链接:

SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 - Cross-Site Scripting

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2002-1131
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Virtual Keyboard plugin for SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 is prone to a cross-site scripting vulnerability because it fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2002-1131

参考链接:

Squirrelmail <=1.4.6 - Local File Inclusion

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2006-2842
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: SquirrelMail 1.4.6 and earlier versions are susceptible to a PHP local file inclusion vulnerability in functions/plugin.php if register_globals is enabled and magic_quotes_gpc is disabled. This allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the plugins array parameter.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2006-2842

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产风险评分
ZZZCMS ZZZPHP 1.6.3 – Remote PHP Code Execution (R🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Uptime-Kuma - Local File Inclusion (LFI)🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
GitHub Enterprise - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台5/5
Apache Log4j2 - Remote Code Injection🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Horde Groupware Unauthenticated Admin Access🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
HTTP API DOM - XSS on JSONP callback🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 - Cross-Site Scripting🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
Squirrelmail <=1.4.6 - Local File Inclusio🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Microsoft FrontPage Extensions - Information Discl🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
SquirrelMail 1.4.x - Folder Name Cross-Site Script🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Open Bulletin Board (OpenBB) v1.0.6 - Open Redirec🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Lotus Domino R5 and R6 WebMail - Information Discl🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Jira Rainbow.Zen - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Joomla! RSfiles <=1.0.2 - Local File Inclu🟡 mediumCVE漏洞Joomla 站点3.5/5
OpenSymphony XWork/Apache Struts2 - Remote Code Ex🟡 mediumCVE漏洞Apache 服务器3.5/5
phpPgAdmin <=4.1.1 - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
WordPress Sniplets <=1.2.2 - Cross-Site Sc🟡 mediumCVE漏洞WordPress 站点3.5/5
CMSimple 3.1 - Local File Inclusion🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Joomla! <=2.0.0 RC2 - Local File Inclusion🟡 mediumCVE漏洞Joomla 站点3.5/5
phpPgAdmin <=4.2.1 - Local File Inclusion🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Joomla! ionFiles 4.4.2 - Local File Inclusion🟡 mediumCVE漏洞Joomla 站点3.5/5
Parallels H-Sphere 3.0.0 P9/3.1 P1 - Cross-Site Sc🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
nweb2fax <=0.2.7 - Local File Inclusion🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
UC Gateway Investment SiteEngine v5.0 - Open Redir🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Autonomy Ultraseek - Open Redirect🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2018/CVE-2019-10647.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-47575.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-56331.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t dast/cves/2021/CVE-2021-45046.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3344.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t http/cves/2002/CVE-2002-1131.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-2842.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板
nuclei -t http/cves/2018/CVE-2019-10647.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-47575.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-56331.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t dast/cves/2021/CVE-2021-45046.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3344.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t http/cves/2002/CVE-2002-1131.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-2842.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/cves/2000/CVE-2000-0114.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-0519.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-1965.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-2428.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-0885.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-4504.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-4556.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-5728.yaml -t http/cves/2008/CVE-2008-1061.yaml -t http/cves/2008/CVE-2008-2650.yaml -t http/cves/2008/CVE-2008-4764.yaml -t http/cves/2008/CVE-2008-5587.yaml -t http/cves/2008/CVE-2008-6080.yaml -t http/cves/2008/CVE-2008-6465.yaml -t http/cves/2008/CVE-2008-6668.yaml -t http/cves/2008/CVE-2008-7269.yaml -t http/cves/2009/CVE-2009-0347.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-12-06
下一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-12-08
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-15

3 个共同标签

从 344 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 18 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-14

3 个共同标签

从 339 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 14 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-13

3 个共同标签

从 344 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 16 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-12

3 个共同标签

从 340 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 19 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-11

3 个共同标签

从 628 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 20 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章