Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-12-01
📊 智能筛选概况
- 发现变更: 605 个模板更新
- 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
- 智能跳过: 575 个低优先级模板
- 高风险漏洞: 15 个
- 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)
💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板,跳过低价值的技术识别类模板,确保高效利用 API 资源。
严重程度分布
- 🔴 严重: 10 个
- 🟠 高危: 5 个
- 🟡 中危: 15 个
🔍 重点漏洞分析
Synology BeeStation BST150-4T - Unauthenticated Command Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2024-10443 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('Command Injection') vulnerability in Task Manager component in Synology BeePhotos before 1.0.2-10026 and 1.1.0-10053 and Synology Photos before 1.6.2-0720 and 1.7.0-0795 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2024-10443
参考链接:
Privileged Remote Access & Remote Support - Command Injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2024-12356 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: A critical vulnerability has been discovered in Privileged Remote Access (PRA) and Remote Support (RS) products which can allow an unauthenticated attacker to inject commands that are run as a site user.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2024-12356
参考链接:
Zabbix Server - Time-Based Blind SQL injection
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2024-22120 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: The Zabbix server can execute commands for configured scripts. After executing a command, an audit entry is added to the "Audit Log". Due to the "clientip" field not being sanitized, it is possible to inject SQL into "clientip" and exploit a time-based blind SQL injection vulnerability.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2024-22120
参考链接:
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2024-45409 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. Ruby-SAML in <= 12.2 and 1.13.0 <= 1.16.0 does not properly verify the signature of the SAML Response.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2024-45409
参考链接:
FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2024-47575 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: A missing authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests to the fgfmd daemon. This vulnerability affects FortiManager versions 7.6.0, 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, 7.0.0 through 7.0.12, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, 6.2.0 through 6.2.12, and all versions of 6.0.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2024-47575
参考链接:
Uptime-Kuma - Local File Inclusion (LFI)
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2024-56331 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Uptime Kuma has an Improper URL Handling vulnerability that can be exploited through the "real-browser" feature. By providing a URL using the file:/// protocol (e.g., file:///etc/passwd), an attacker can obtain a screenshot of local sensitive files, because the user input is not validated by the server.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2024-56331
参考链接:
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-1550 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading
攻击向量: 网络扫描
参考链接:
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-25291 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: GitLab 平台
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291
参考链接:
Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-32433 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11, and OTP-25.3.2.20, a SSH server may allow an attacker to perform unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in SSH protocol message handling, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems and execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-32433
参考链接:
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2025-6216 - 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216
参考链接:
Looney Tunables Linux - Local Privilege Escalation
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2023-4911 - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: A buffer overflow was discovered in the GNU C Library's dynamic loader ld.so while processing the GLIBC_TUNABLES environment variable. This issue could allow a local attacker to use maliciously crafted GLIBC_TUNABLES environment variables when launching binaries with SUID permission to execute code with elevated privileges.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2023-4911
参考链接:
glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2023-6246 - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the __vsyslog_internal function of the glibc library. This function is called by the syslog and vsyslog functions. This issue occurs when the openlog function was not called, or called with the ident argument set to NULL, and the program name (the basename of argv[0]) is bigger than 1024 bytes, resulting in an application crash or local privilege escalation. This issue affects glibc 2.36 and newer.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2023-6246
参考链接:
PHP imap - Remote Command Execution
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2018-19518 - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: University of Washington IMAP Toolkit 2007f on UNIX, as used in imap_open() in PHP and other products, launches an rsh command (by means of the imap_rimap function in c-client/imap4r1.c and the tcp_aopen function in osdep/unix/tcp_unix.c) without preventing argument injection, which might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands if the IMAP server name is untrusted input (e.g., entered by a user of a web application) and if rsh has been replaced by a program with different argument semantics. For example, if rsh is a link to ssh (as seen on Debian and Ubuntu systems), then the attack can use an IMAP server name containing a "-oProxyCommand" argument.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2018-19518
参考链接:
SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 - Cross-Site Scripting
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2002-1131 - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: The Virtual Keyboard plugin for SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 is prone to a cross-site scripting vulnerability because it fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2002-1131
参考链接:
Squirrelmail <=1.4.6 - Local File Inclusion
- 漏洞ID:
CVE-2006-2842 - 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
- 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
- 影响资产: 未知
- 预估影响: 数千个
描述: SquirrelMail 1.4.6 and earlier versions are susceptible to a PHP local file inclusion vulnerability in functions/plugin.php if register_globals is enabled and magic_quotes_gpc is disabled. This allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the plugins array parameter.
攻击向量: 网络扫描
CVE编号: CVE-2006-2842
参考链接:
📋 完整模板列表
| 模板名称 | 严重程度 | 类别 | 影响资产 | 风险评分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synology BeeStation BST150-4T - Unauthenticated Co | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 5/5 |
| Privileged Remote Access & Remote Support - Comman | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 5/5 |
| Zabbix Server - Time-Based Blind SQL injection | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 5/5 |
| GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 5/5 |
| FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 5/5 |
| Uptime-Kuma - Local File Inclusion (LFI) | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 5/5 |
| Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 5/5 |
| GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | GitLab 平台 | 5/5 |
| Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 5/5 |
| Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa | 🔴 critical | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 5/5 |
| Looney Tunables Linux - Local Privilege Escalation | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 4.5/5 |
| glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 4.5/5 |
| PHP imap - Remote Command Execution | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 4.5/5 |
| SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 4.5/5 |
| Squirrelmail <=1.4.6 - Local File Inclusio | 🟠 high | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 4.5/5 |
| PHP Login System 2.0.1 - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| WordPress Elementor Website Builder <= 3.5 | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | WordPress 站点 | 3.5/5 |
| Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Jakarta Tomcat 3.1 and 3.0 - Information Disclosur | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| SquirrelMail 1.4.x - Folder Name Cross-Site Script | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Open Bulletin Board (OpenBB) v1.0.6 - Open Redirec | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| SquirrelMail Address Add 1.4.2 - Cross-Site Script | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| SAP Web Application Server 6.x/7.0 - Open Redirect | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Cofax <=2.0RC3 - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Cherokee HTTPD <=0.5 - Cross-Site Scriptin | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Jira Rainbow.Zen - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
| Joomla! RSfiles <=1.0.2 - Local File Inclu | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | Joomla 站点 | 3.5/5 |
| OpenSymphony XWork/Apache Struts2 - Remote Code Ex | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | Apache 服务器 | 3.5/5 |
| phpPgAdmin <=4.1.1 - Cross-Site Scripting | 🟡 medium | CVE漏洞 | 通用 | 3.5/5 |
🛡️ 安全建议
🚨 发现高风险漏洞,建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞,及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞,优先处理
🔧 扫描建议
建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描:
# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-10443.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-12356.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-22120.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-45409.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-47575.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-56331.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-4911.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t dast/cves/2018/CVE-2018-19518.yaml -t http/cves/2002/CVE-2002-1131.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-2842.yaml -u target-url
# 扫描所有今日新增模板
nuclei -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-10443.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-12356.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-22120.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-45409.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-47575.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-56331.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-4911.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t dast/cves/2018/CVE-2018-19518.yaml -t http/cves/2002/CVE-2002-1131.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-2842.yaml -t http/cves/2023/CVE-2023-38875.yaml -t headless/cves/2022/CVE-2022-29455-headless.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t http/cves/2000/CVE-2000-0760.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-0519.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-1965.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3128.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3634.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-4385.yaml -t http/cves/2006/CVE-2006-1681.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-0885.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-4504.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-4556.yaml -t http/cves/2007/CVE-2007-5728.yaml -u target-url
本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成,数据来源:ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates
扫描建议仅供参考,请在授权环境下进行安全测试