Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-11-18

📊 智能筛选概况

• 发现变更: 614 个模板更新
• 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
• 智能跳过: 584 个低优先级模板
• 高风险漏洞: 21 个
• 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

• 🔴 严重: 13 个
• 🟠 高危: 8 个
• 🟡 中危: 9 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

Synology BeeStation BST150-4T - Unauthenticated Command Injection

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-10443
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('Command Injection') vulnerability in Task Manager component in Synology BeePhotos before 1.0.2-10026 and 1.1.0-10053 and Synology Photos before 1.6.2-0720 and 1.7.0-0795 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-10443

参考链接:

• 参考资料

FortiManager Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-47575
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A missing authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests to the fgfmd daemon. This vulnerability affects FortiManager versions 7.6.0, 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, 7.0.0 through 7.0.12, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, 6.2.0 through 6.2.12, and all versions of 6.0.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-47575

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

InvoiceShelf <= 1.3.0 - PHP Deserialization

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-55556
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: InvoiceShelf version 1.3.0 and below contains an unauthenticated PHP deserialization vulnerability that can lead to remote code execution. An attacker with knowledge of the APP_KEY can achieve remote command execution on the server through Laravel's cookie deserialization. While the vulnerability is severe, it is partially mitigated in default installations as the APP_KEY is regenerated during setup.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-55556

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Uptime-Kuma - Local File Inclusion (LFI)

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-56331
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Uptime Kuma has an Improper URL Handling vulnerability that can be exploited through the "real-browser" feature. By providing a URL using the file:/// protocol (e.g., file:///etc/passwd), an attacker can obtain a screenshot of local sensitive files, because the user input is not validated by the server.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-56331

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GitHub Enterprise - SAML Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-9487
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed SAML SSO authentication to be bypassed resulting in unauthorized provisioning of users and access to the instance. Exploitation required the encrypted assertions feature to be enabled, and the attacker would require direct network access as well as a signed SAML response or metadata document. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.15 and was fixed in versions 3.11.16, 3.12.10, 3.13.5, and 3.14.2. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: GitLab 平台
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-54309
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-9242
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: WatchGuard Fireware OS 11.10.2 to 11.12.4_Update1, 12.0 to 12.11.3, and 2025.1 contains an out-of-bounds write caused by improper handling in Mobile User VPN and Branch Office VPN with IKEv2 dynamic gateway peer, letting remote unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-9242

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Apache Log4j2 - Remote Code Injection

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2021-45046-DAST
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Apache Log4j2 Thread Context Lookup Pattern is vulnerable to remote code execution in certain non-default configurations.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2021-45046

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Spring Framework RCE via Data Binding on JDK 9+

• 漏洞ID: spring4shell-CVE-2022-22965
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2022-22965

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Next.js Middleware Authorization Bypass

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS
• 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A critical vulnerability in Next.js middleware allows attackers to bypass authorization checks by manipulating the x-middleware-subrequest header. This flaw affects Next.js versions prior to 14.2.25 and 15.2.3, potentially granting unauthorized access to sensitive resources.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-29927

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

GameOver(lay) - Local Privilege Escalation in Ubuntu Kernel

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-2640
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A local privilege escalation vulnerability has been discovered in the OverlayFS module of the Ubuntu kernel. This vulnerability could allow an attacker with local access to escalate their privileges, potentially gaining root-like access to the system.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-2640

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-6246
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the __vsyslog_internal function of the glibc library. This function is called by the syslog and vsyslog functions. This issue occurs when the openlog function was not called, or called with the ident argument set to NULL, and the program name (the basename of argv[0]) is bigger than 1024 bytes, resulting in an application crash or local privilege escalation. This issue affects glibc 2.36 and newer.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-6246

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

sqlparse - Denial of Service

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-4340
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Passing a heavily nested list to sqlparse.parse() leads to a Denial of Service due to RecursionError.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-4340

参考链接:

• 参考资料

PHP - LFR to Remote Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-2961
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: PHP Local File Read vulnerability leading to Remote Code Execution

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-2961

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

HTTP API DOM - XSS on JSONP callback

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-29882
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: SRS is a simple, high-efficiency, real-time video server. SRS's /api/v1/vhosts/vid-<id>?callback=<payload> endpoint didn't filter the callback function name which led to injecting malicious javascript payloads and executing XSS ( Cross-Site Scripting). This vulnerability is fixed in 5.0.210 and 6.0.121.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-29882

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料

Polyfill Supply Chain Attack Malicious Code Execution

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-38526
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: pdoc provides API Documentation for Python Projects. Documentation generated with pdoc --math linked to JavaScript files from polyfill.io

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-38526

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 - Cross-Site Scripting

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2002-1131
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Virtual Keyboard plugin for SquirrelMail 1.2.6/1.2.7 is prone to a cross-site scripting vulnerability because it fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2002-1131

参考链接:

• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料
• 参考资料

OpenSSL Heartbleed Vulnerability

• 漏洞ID: CVE-2014-0160
• 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
• 风险等级: 高风险 (4/5)
• 影响资产: 未知
• 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Heartbleed bug allows anyone on the Internet to read the memory of the systems protected by the vulnerable versions of the OpenSSL software. This compromises the secret keys used to identify the service providers and to encrypt the traffic, the names and passwords of the users, and the actual content. This allows attackers to eavesdrop on communications, steal data directly from the services and users, and impersonate services and users.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

• 参考资料

📋 完整模板列表

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-10443.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-47575.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-55556.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-56331.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t dast/cves/2021/CVE-2021-45046.yaml -t dast/cves/2022/CVE-2022-22965.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-2640.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-4340.yaml -t dast/cves/2024/CVE-2024-2961.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-38526.yaml -t http/cves/2002/CVE-2002-1131.yaml -t code/cves/2014/CVE-2014-0160.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板
nuclei -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-10443.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-47575.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-55556.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-56331.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t dast/cves/2021/CVE-2021-45046.yaml -t dast/cves/2022/CVE-2022-22965.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-29927-HEADLESS.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-2640.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-4340.yaml -t dast/cves/2024/CVE-2024-2961.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-38526.yaml -t http/cves/2002/CVE-2002-1131.yaml -t code/cves/2014/CVE-2014-0160.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/cves/2000/CVE-2000-0114.yaml -t http/cves/2000/CVE-2000-0760.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-0519.yaml -t http/cves/2004/CVE-2004-1965.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-2428.yaml -t http/cves/2005/CVE-2005-3128.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试