Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-11-14

NucleiPOC分析漏洞扫描

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-11-14

📊 智能筛选概况

  • 发现变更: 603 个模板更新
  • 精选分析: 30 个高价值 POC
  • 智能跳过: 573 个低优先级模板
  • 高风险漏洞: 23 个
  • 主要类别: CVE漏洞(30)

💡 智能筛选说明: 系统自动优先分析 CVE 漏洞、高危漏洞和新增模板，跳过低价值的技术识别类模板，确保高效利用 API 资源。

严重程度分布

  • 🔴 严重: 17 个
  • 🟠 高危: 6 个
  • 🟡 中危: 7 个

🔍 重点漏洞分析

WordPress Automatic Plugin - Unauthenticated Options Change

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2021-4374
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个

描述: WordPress Automatic Plugin (versions 3.53.2 and below) contains a critical vulnerability that allows unauthenticated users to change arbitrary WordPress options through the process_form.php script. The vulnerable script uses update_option() on all POST parameters without authentication or capability checks, allowing attackers to create administrator accounts or modify critical settings. The vulnerability can be exploited even if the plugin is deactivated as it's a standalone script.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2021-4374

参考链接:

WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-9242
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: WatchGuard Fireware OS 11.10.2 to 11.12.4_Update1, 12.0 to 12.11.3, and 2025.1 contains an out-of-bounds write caused by improper handling in Mobile User VPN and Branch Office VPN with IKEv2 dynamic gateway peer, letting remote unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-9242

参考链接:

Triofox - Improper Access Control

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-12480
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Gladinet Triofox solution before 12.91.1126.65588 and CentreStack before 12.10.595.65696 allow unauthenticated access to the /management/admindatabase.aspx endpoint, exposing sensitive database management functionality to anyone with network access. An unauthenticated attacker can remotely access, view, and potentially interact with the database management interface, risking data disclosure or system compromise.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-12480

参考链接:

Abandoned Cart Lite for WooCommerce - Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-2986
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: WordPress 站点
  • 预估影响: 数千万个

描述: The Abandoned Cart Lite for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authentication bypass in versions up to, and including, 5.14.2. This is due to insufficient encryption on the user being supplied during the abandoned cart link decode through the plugin. This allows unauthenticated attackers to log in as users who have abandoned the cart, who are typically customers. Further security hardening was introduced in version 5.15.1 that ensures sites are no longer vulnerable through historical check-out links, and additional hardening was introduced in version 5.15.2 that ensured null key values wouldn't permit the authentication bypass.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-2986

参考链接:

Synology BeeStation BST150-4T - Unauthenticated Command Injection

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-10443
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('Command Injection') vulnerability in Task Manager component in Synology BeePhotos before 1.0.2-10026 and 1.1.0-10053 and Synology Photos before 1.6.2-0720 and 1.7.0-0795 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-10443

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-45409
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. Ruby-SAML in <= 12.2 and 1.13.0 <= 1.16.0 does not properly verify the signature of the SAML Response.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-45409

参考链接:

InvoiceShelf <= 1.3.0 - PHP Deserialization

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-55556
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: InvoiceShelf version 1.3.0 and below contains an unauthenticated PHP deserialization vulnerability that can lead to remote code execution. An attacker with knowledge of the APP_KEY can achieve remote command execution on the server through Laravel's cookie deserialization. While the vulnerability is severe, it is partially mitigated in default installations as the APP_KEY is regenerated during setup.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-55556

参考链接:

Uptime-Kuma - Local File Inclusion (LFI)

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-56331
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Uptime Kuma has an Improper URL Handling vulnerability that can be exploited through the "real-browser" feature. By providing a URL using the file:/// protocol (e.g., file:///etc/passwd), an attacker can obtain a screenshot of local sensitive files, because the user input is not validated by the server.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-56331

参考链接:

GitHub Enterprise - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-9487
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed SAML SSO authentication to be bypassed resulting in unauthorized provisioning of users and access to the instance. Exploitation required the encrypted assertions feature to be enabled, and the attacker would require direct network access as well as a signed SAML response or metadata document. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.15 and was fixed in versions 3.11.16, 3.12.10, 3.13.5, and 3.14.2. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-1550
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading

攻击向量: 网络扫描

参考链接:

Ivanti Connect Secure - Stack-based Buffer Overflow

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-22457
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.6, Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.4, and Ivanti ZTA Gateways before version 22.8R2.2 contain a stack-based buffer overflow caused by improper input handling, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code without authentication.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-22457

参考链接:

GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-25291
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: GitLab 平台
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-25291

参考链接:

Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-32433
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.3, OTP-26.2.5.11, and OTP-25.3.2.20, a SSH server may allow an attacker to perform unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE). By exploiting a flaw in SSH protocol message handling, a malicious actor could gain unauthorized access to affected systems and execute arbitrary commands without valid credentials.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-32433

参考链接:

CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-54309
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.5 and 11 before 11.3.4_23, when the DMZ proxy feature is not used, mishandles AS2 validation and consequently allows remote attackers to obtain admin access via HTTPS, as exploited in the wild in July 2025.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-54309

参考链接:

Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Password Reset Token

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-6216
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Allegra calculateTokenExpDate Password Recovery Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Allegra. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the password recovery mechanism. The issue results from reliance upon a predictable value when generating a password reset token. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the application.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-6216

参考链接:

WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2025-9242
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: WatchGuard Fireware OS 11.10.2 to 11.12.4_Update1, 12.0 to 12.11.3, and 2025.1 contains an out-of-bounds write caused by improper handling in Mobile User VPN and Branch Office VPN with IKEv2 dynamic gateway peer, letting remote unauthenticated attackers execute arbitrary code.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2025-9242

参考链接:

Text4Shell - Remote Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2022-42889
  • 严重程度: 🔴 CRITICAL
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Apache Commons Text performs variable interpolation, allowing properties to be dynamically evaluated and expanded. The standard format for interpolation is "${prefix:name}", where "prefix" is used to locate an instance of org.apache.commons.text.lookup.StringLookup that performs the interpolation. Starting with version 1.5 and continuing through 1.9, the set of default Lookup instances included interpolators that could result in arbitrary code execution or contact with remote servers. These lookups are: - "script" - execute expressions using the JVM script execution engine (javax.script) - "dns" - resolve dns records - "url" - load values from urls, including from remote servers Applications using the interpolation defaults in the affected versions may be vulnerable to remote code execution or unintentional contact with remote servers if untrusted configuration values are used. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Commons Text 1.10.0, which disables the problematic interpolators by default.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2022-42889

参考链接:

Sudo <= 1.8.27 - Security Bypass

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2019-14287
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: In Sudo before 1.8.28, an attacker with access to a Runas ALL sudoer account can bypass certain policy blacklists and session PAM modules, and can cause incorrect logging, by invoking sudo with a crafted user ID. For example, this allows bypass of !root configuration, and USER= logging, for a "sudo -u #$((0xffffffff))" command.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2019-14287

参考链接:

Sudo Baron Samedit - Local Privilege Escalation

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2021-3156
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Sudo before 1.9.5p2 contains an off-by-one error that can result in a heap-based buffer overflow, which allows privilege escalation to root via "sudoedit -s" and a command-line argument that ends with a single backslash character.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2021-3156

参考链接:

glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2023-6246
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the __vsyslog_internal function of the glibc library. This function is called by the syslog and vsyslog functions. This issue occurs when the openlog function was not called, or called with the ident argument set to NULL, and the program name (the basename of argv[0]) is bigger than 1024 bytes, resulting in an application crash or local privilege escalation. This issue affects glibc 2.36 and newer.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2023-6246

参考链接:

sqlparse - Denial of Service

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-4340
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: Passing a heavily nested list to sqlparse.parse() leads to a Denial of Service due to RecursionError.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-4340

参考链接:

HTTP API DOM - XSS on JSONP callback

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-29882
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: SRS is a simple, high-efficiency, real-time video server. SRS's /api/v1/vhosts/vid-&lt;id&gt;?callback&#x3D;&lt;payload&gt; endpoint didn't filter the callback function name which led to injecting malicious javascript payloads and executing XSS ( Cross-Site Scripting). This vulnerability is fixed in 5.0.210 and 6.0.121.

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-29882

参考链接:

Polyfill Supply Chain Attack Malicious Code Execution

  • 漏洞ID: CVE-2024-38526
  • 严重程度: 🟠 HIGH
  • 风险等级: 极高风险 (4.5/5)
  • 影响资产: 未知
  • 预估影响: 数千个

描述: pdoc provides API Documentation for Python Projects. Documentation generated with pdoc --math linked to JavaScript files from polyfill.io

攻击向量: 网络扫描

CVE编号: CVE-2024-38526

参考链接:

📋 完整模板列表

模板名称严重程度类别影响资产风险评分
WordPress Automatic Plugin - Unauthenticated Optio🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点5/5
WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Triofox - Improper Access Control🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Abandoned Cart Lite for WooCommerce - Authenticati🔴 criticalCVE漏洞WordPress 站点5/5
Synology BeeStation BST150-4T - Unauthenticated Co🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台5/5
InvoiceShelf <= 1.3.0 - PHP Deserializatio🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Uptime-Kuma - Local File Inclusion (LFI)🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
GitHub Enterprise - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Keras Model.load_model - Arbitrary Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Ivanti Connect Secure - Stack-based Buffer Overflo🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
GitLab - SAML Authentication Bypass🔴 criticalCVE漏洞GitLab 平台5/5
Erlang/OTP SSH - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass Race Condition🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Allegra - Authentication Bypass via Predictable Pa🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
WatchGuard IKEv2 Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Text4Shell - Remote Code Execution🔴 criticalCVE漏洞通用5/5
Sudo <= 1.8.27 - Security Bypass🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
Sudo Baron Samedit - Local Privilege Escalation🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
glibc's syslog - Local Privilege Escalation🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
sqlparse - Denial of Service🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
HTTP API DOM - XSS on JSONP callback🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
Polyfill Supply Chain Attack Malicious Code Execut🟠 highCVE漏洞通用4.5/5
Swagger UI < 3.38.0 - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
WordPress Elementor Website Builder <= 3.5🟡 mediumCVE漏洞WordPress 站点3.5/5
Essential Addons for Elementor < 6.0.15 - Cross🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Backdrop CMS - Cross-Site Scripting🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Swagger UI >=3.14.1 < 3.38.0 - DOM Base🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Microsoft FrontPage Extensions - Information Discl🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5
Jakarta Tomcat 3.1 and 3.0 - Information Disclosur🟡 mediumCVE漏洞通用3.5/5

🛡️ 安全建议

🚨 发现高风险漏洞，建议立即扫描相关资产 🔍 关注新发布的 CVE 漏洞，及时更新补丁 ⚡ 检测到远程代码执行漏洞，优先处理

🔧 扫描建议

建议使用以下 Nuclei 命令进行扫描：

# 扫描高危漏洞
nuclei -t http/cves/2021/CVE-2021-4374.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-12480.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-2986.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-10443.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-45409.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-55556.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-56331.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22457.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t dast/cves/2022/CVE-2022-42889.yaml -t code/cves/2019/CVE-2019-14287.yaml -t code/cves/2021/CVE-2021-3156.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-4340.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-38526.yaml -u target-url

# 扫描所有今日新增模板
nuclei -t http/cves/2021/CVE-2021-4374.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t http/cves/2025/CVE-2025-12480.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-2986.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-10443.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-45409.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-55556.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-56331.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-9487.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-1550.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-22457.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25291.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-32433.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-54309.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-6216.yaml -t code/cves/2025/CVE-2025-9242.yaml -t dast/cves/2022/CVE-2022-42889.yaml -t code/cves/2019/CVE-2019-14287.yaml -t code/cves/2021/CVE-2021-3156.yaml -t code/cves/2023/CVE-2023-6246.yaml -t code/cves/2024/CVE-2024-4340.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-29882.yaml -t headless/cves/2024/CVE-2024-38526.yaml -t headless/cves/2018/CVE-2018-25031.yaml -t headless/cves/2022/CVE-2022-29455-headless.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-24752.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-25062.yaml -t headless/cves/2025/CVE-2025-8191.yaml -t http/cves/2000/CVE-2000-0114.yaml -t http/cves/2000/CVE-2000-0760.yaml -u target-url

本报告基于 Nuclei 模板库自动生成，数据来源：ProjectDiscovery/nuclei-templates

扫描建议仅供参考，请在授权环境下进行安全测试

在 Twitter 上讨论•在 GitHub 上查看
上一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-11-13
下一篇文章
Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2025-11-15
返回博客列表

文章目录

相关文章

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-15

3 个共同标签

从 344 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 18 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-14

3 个共同标签

从 339 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 14 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-13

3 个共同标签

从 344 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 16 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-12

3 个共同标签

从 340 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 19 个高风险漏洞

Nuclei POC 精选分析 - 2026-01-11

3 个共同标签

从 628 个模板更新中精选分析 30 个高价值 POC，发现 20 个高风险漏洞

查看更多文章